Literature DB >> 29977106

Competing influences of anthropogenic warming, ENSO, and plant physiology on future terrestrial aridity.

Céline Bonfils1, Gemma Anderson1, Benjamin D Santer1, Thomas J Phillips1, Karl E Taylor1, Matthias Cuntz2, Mark D Zelinka1, Kate Marvel3, Benjamin I Cook3, Ivana Cvijanovic1, Paul J Durack1.   

Abstract

The 2011-2016 Californian drought illustrates that drought-prone areas do not always experience relief once a favorable phase of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) returns. In the 21st century, such an expectation is unrealistic in regions where global warming induces an increase in terrestrial aridity larger than the aridity changes driven by ENSO variability. This premise is also flawed in areas where precipitation supply cannot offset the global warming-induced increased evaporative demand. Here, atmosphere-only experiments are analyzed to identify land regions in which aridity is currently sensitive to ENSO, and where projected future changes in mean aridity exceed the range caused by ENSO variability. Insights into the drivers of these aridity changes are obtained in simulations with incremental addition of three different factors to current climate: ocean warming, vegetation response to elevated CO2 levels, and intensified CO2 radiative forcing. The effect of ocean warming overwhelms the range of ENSO-driven temperature variability worldwide, increasing potential evapotranspiration (PET) in most ENSO-sensitive regions. Additionally, ~39% of the regions currently sensitive to ENSO receive less precipitation in the future, independent of the ENSO phase. Aridity increases consequently in 67-72% of the ENSO-sensitive area. When both radiative and physiological effects are considered, the area affected by aridity rises to 75-79% when using PET-derived measures of aridity, but declines to 41% when total soil moisture aridity indicator is employed. This reduction mainly occurs because plant stomatal resistance increases under enhanced CO2 concentrations, which results in improved plant water use efficiency, and hence reduced evapotranspiration and soil desiccation. Imposing CO2-invariant stomatal resistance may overestimate future drying in PET-derived indices.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29977106      PMCID: PMC6027755          DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0005.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clim        ISSN: 0894-8755            Impact factor:   5.148


  14 in total

Review 1.  Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle.

Authors:  Myles R Allen; William J Ingram
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply.

Authors:  Martin Jung; Markus Reichstein; Philippe Ciais; Sonia I Seneviratne; Justin Sheffield; Michael L Goulden; Gordon Bonan; Alessandro Cescatti; Jiquan Chen; Richard de Jeu; A Johannes Dolman; Werner Eugster; Dieter Gerten; Damiano Gianelle; Nadine Gobron; Jens Heinke; John Kimball; Beverly E Law; Leonardo Montagnani; Qiaozhen Mu; Brigitte Mueller; Keith Oleson; Dario Papale; Andrew D Richardson; Olivier Roupsard; Steve Running; Enrico Tomelleri; Nicolas Viovy; Ulrich Weber; Christopher Williams; Eric Wood; Sönke Zaehle; Ke Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Climate science: The Sun and the rain.

Authors:  Steven Sherwood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Robust twenty-first-century projections of El Niño and related precipitation variability.

Authors:  Scott Power; François Delage; Christine Chung; Greg Kociuba; Kevin Keay
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Identifying external influences on global precipitation.

Authors:  Kate Marvel; Céline Bonfils
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California.

Authors:  Noah S Diffenbaugh; Daniel L Swain; Danielle Touma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Little change in global drought over the past 60 years.

Authors:  Justin Sheffield; Eric F Wood; Michael L Roderick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Progressive forest canopy water loss during the 2012-2015 California drought.

Authors:  Gregory P Asner; Philip G Brodrick; Christopher B Anderson; Nicholas Vaughn; David E Knapp; Roberta E Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Vegetation Greening and Climate Change Promote Multidecadal Rises of Global Land Evapotranspiration.

Authors:  Ke Zhang; John S Kimball; Ramakrishna R Nemani; Steven W Running; Yang Hong; Jonathan J Gourley; Zhongbo Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Unprecedented 21st century drought risk in the American Southwest and Central Plains.

Authors:  Benjamin I Cook; Toby R Ault; Jason E Smerdon
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.