| Literature DB >> 26514110 |
Ke Zhang1,2,3, John S Kimball4, Ramakrishna R Nemani5, Steven W Running4, Yang Hong2,6, Jonathan J Gourley7, Zhongbo Yu3.
Abstract
Recent studies showed that anomalous dry conditions and limited moisture supply roughly between 1998 and 2008, especially in the Southern Hemisphere, led to reduced vegetation productivity and ceased growth in land evapotranspiration (ET). However, natural variability of Earth's climate system can degrade capabilities for identifying climate trends. Here we produced a long-term (1982-2013) remote sensing based land ET record and investigated multidecadal changes in global ET and underlying causes. The ET record shows a significant upward global trend of 0.88 mm yr(-2) (P < 0.001) over the 32-year period, mainly driven by vegetation greening (0.018% per year; P < 0.001) and rising atmosphere moisture demand (0.75 mm yr(-2); P = 0.016). Our results indicate that reduced ET growth between 1998 and 2008 was an episodic phenomenon, with subsequent recovery of the ET growth rate after 2008. Terrestrial precipitation also shows a positive trend of 0.66 mm yr(-2) (P = 0.08) over the same period consistent with expected water cycle intensification, but this trend is lower than coincident increases in evaporative demand and ET, implying a possibility of cumulative water supply constraint to ET. Continuation of these trends will likely exacerbate regional drought-induced disturbances, especially during regional dry climate phases associated with strong El Niño events.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26514110 PMCID: PMC4626800 DOI: 10.1038/srep15956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Annual anomalies of remote sensing based global land ET estimates from 1982 to 2013 for the global land area (snow/ice covered areas excluded), global land air temperature and NDVI. The vertical brown dashed line indicates the June 1991 volcanic eruption of Mount Pinatubo. The grey area denotes the min-max ensemble range and provides a relative measure of uncertainty for the ET and NDVI due to differences between the third generation Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS3g) and University of Arizona Vegetation Index and Phenology lab (VIP) NDVI time series. Another data-driven global land ET estimate from a previous study3 is shown as a black line. A multivariate ENSO index, MEI48, is shown with vertical color shading, where red and blue shades denote respective positive (El Niño) and negative (La Niña) phases, and darker shades indicate greater MEI intensity. (b) Spatial pattern of global land ET trends from 1982 to 2013; areas with non-significant (P ≥ 0.1) trends are marked in grey. The linear trends in (a,b) are calculated by the Kendall-Theil robust line and shown as dashed lines in (a). This figure was created using the Interactive Data Language (IDL) Core Version 7.1.2.
Figure 2Geographic distribution of primary climatic control factors regulating terrestrial ET derived from multi-year (1982–2013) reanalysis and remote sensing based radiation data (map (a)).
Global areas showing significant (P < 0.1) changes from 1982 to 2013 in demand (b), energy (c) and supply (d) controls to ET are also shown. The inset graph shows the total proportional (%) areas experiencing significant trends in the three climatic control factors. White land areas denote persistent ice/snow cover and were masked from the analysis. This figure was created using the IDL Core Version 7.1.2.
Figure 3(a) Factorial contributions of vegetation dynamics (V), solar shortwave radiation (R), wind speed (W), atmospheric CO2 concentration (C), actual air vapor pressure (H), air temperature (T), and their two-way and higher-order interactions affecting global land ET; (b) yearly contributions of the most influential factor, V, and sum of the other factors affecting global land ET. This figure was created using the IDL Core Version 7.1.2.
Figure 4Yearly anomalies of P, PET, CWD (P-PET), and TWA from 1982 to 2013; the linear trends of annual values of the above three variables are calculated by the Kendall-Theil robust line and shown as dashed lines.
Grey areas denote the min-max ensemble range as a relative measure of uncertainty in the global calculations. The color scheme of the MEI is the same as in Fig. 2.; *P < 0.1, **P < 0.05. This figure was created using the IDL Core Version 7.1.2.
Summary of all factorial simulations conducted in this study.
| Simulation/Treatment | Description |
|---|---|
| f(control) | Simulation with 1982–1989 mean (i.e. the multi-year mean for individual day of the Julian days) climate condition, atmospheric CO2 concentration and vegetation dynamics |
| Radiation fluxes vary according to the SRB-CERES record; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Temperatures vary according to the NCEP2 record; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Air water vapor pressure varies according to the NCEP2 record; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Wind speed varies according to the NCEP2 record; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Vegetation varies according to the harmonized remote sensing NDVI record; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Atmospheric CO2 concentration varies according to the NOAA ESRL record; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Radiation fluxes and temperatures vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Radiation fluxes and air water vapor pressure vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Radiation fluxes and wind speed vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Radiation fluxes and vegetation vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Radiation fluxes and atmospheric CO2 concentration vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Temperatures and air water vapor pressure vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Temperatures and wind speed vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Temperatures and vegetation vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Temperatures vary and atmospheric CO2 concentration vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Air water vapor pressure and wind speed vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Air water vapor pressure and vegetation vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Air water vapor pressure and atmospheric CO2 concentration vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Wind speed and vegetation vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Wind speed and atmospheric CO2 concentration vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| Vegetation and atmospheric CO2 concentration vary; other variables according to control conditions | |
| All variables vary |
1The factors are: R, radiation fluxes; T, temperatures; H, air water vapor pressure; W, wind speed; V, vegetation; C, CO2.