Literature DB >> 29976593

Histopathological Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection: Does a Threshold of 23 Neutrophils Do Better than Classification of the Periprosthetic Membrane in a Prospective Multicenter Study?

Pascale Bémer1, Julie Léger2,3, Serge Milin4, Chloé Plouzeau5, Anne Sophie Valentin6, Nathalie Stock7, Anne Jolivet-Gougeon8, Anne Moreau9, Stéphane Corvec10, Isabelle Quintin-Roue11, Didier Tandé12, Geneviève Héry-Arnaud12, Marie-Christine Rousselet13, Carole Lemarié14, Marie Kempf14, Patrick Michenet15, Laurent Bret16, Gonzague de Pinieux17, Christophe Burucoa5.   

Abstract

No gold standard exists for histopathological diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The historical criterion considers the presence of neutrophil infiltration upon examination of periprosthetic tissue. Morawietz et al. proposed a classification of periprosthetic membranes (Morawietz et al., Clin Pathol 59:591-597, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2005.027458) and a more recently described classification with a new cutoff value of 23 neutrophils in 10 high-power fields (Morawietz et al., Histopathology 54:847-853, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03313.x). We performed a multicenter prospective study, which compared both methods for the diagnosis of PJI. All suspicions of PJI (n = 264) between December 2010 and March 2012 in seven centers were prospectively included. Five perioperative specimens were collected per patient for cultures, and one was collected for histology. Diagnosis of PJI was made according to the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines. Histopathological analysis classified the patients according to the threshold of 23 neutrophils and according to the classification of Morawietz. Performances of both methods were compared by using clinical and/or bacteriological criteria as the gold standard. Among 264 patients with suspected PJI, a diagnosis of infection was confirmed in 215 and unconfirmed in 49 patients. Histopathological analysis was available for 150 confirmed PJI and 40 unconfirmed PJI cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 78.7%, 90.0%, 96.7%, 52.9%, and 81.1%, respectively, for the Morawietz classification, and 82.0%, 90.0%, 96.9%, 57.1%, and 83.7%, respectively, for the 23-neutrophil threshold. The new algorithm using a threshold of 23 neutrophils can be proposed as a new gold standard for the histopathological diagnosis of PJI.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neutrophil threshold; periprosthetic interface membrane; prosthetic joint Infection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29976593      PMCID: PMC6113493          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00536-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  21 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of infection after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dean T Tsukayama; Victor M Goldberg; Richard Kyle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Benjamin Zmistowski; Elie F Berbari; Thomas W Bauer; Bryan D Springer; Craig J Della Valle; Kevin L Garvin; Michael A Mont; Montri D Wongworawat; Charalampos G Zalavras
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology.

Authors:  V Krenn; L Morawietz; G Perino; H Kienapfel; R Ascherl; G J Hassenpflug; M Thomsen; P Thomas; M Huber; D Kendoff; D Baumhoer; M G Krukemeyer; S Natu; F Boettner; J Zustin; B Kölbel; W Rüther; J P Kretzer; A Tiemann; A Trampuz; L Frommelt; R Tichilow; S Söder; S Müller; J Parvizi; U Illgner; T Gehrke
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  First experience of a multicenter external quality assessment of molecular 16S rRNA gene detection in bone and joint infections.

Authors:  Chloé Plouzeau; Pascale Bémer; Anne Sophie Valentin; Geneviève Héry-Arnaud; Didier Tandé; Anne Jolivet-Gougeon; Pascal Vincent; Marie Kempf; Carole Lemarié; Jérôme Guinard; Laurent Bret; Anne Sophie Cognée; Sophie Gibaud; Christophe Burucoa; Stéphane Corvec
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  CD15 focus score: Infection diagnosis and stratification into low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens in periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  V T Krenn; M Liebisch; B Kölbel; N Renz; T Gehrke; M Huber; M G Krukemeyer; A Trampuz; H Resch; V Krenn
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  Diagnosis of infection by frozen section during revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  N A Athanasou; R Pandey; R de Steiger; D Crook; P M Smith
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-01

7.  Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  M J Spangehl; B A Masri; J X O'Connell; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  D S Feldman; J H Lonner; P Desai; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Aaron J Tande; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Italian guidelines for the diagnosis and infectious disease management of osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infections in adults.

Authors:  S Esposito; S Leone; M Bassetti; S Borrè; F Leoncini; E Meani; M Venditti; F Mazzotta
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 7.455

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of implant debris-associated inflammation.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Jiri Gallo; Emmanuel Gibon; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 2.  Enhancing Diagnostics in Orthopedic Infections.

Authors:  Eibhlin Higgins; Gina A Suh; Aaron J Tande
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 11.677

3.  The Right Time to Safely Re-Evaluate Empirical Antimicrobial Treatment of Hip or Knee Prosthetic Joint Infections.

Authors:  Luc Deroche; Pascale Bémer; Anne-Sophie Valentin; Anne Jolivet-Gougeon; Didier Tandé; Geneviève Héry-Arnaud; Carole Lemarié; Marie Kempf; Laurent Bret; Christophe Burucoa; Stéphane Corvec; Chloé Plouzeau
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Pathological analysis of periprosthetic soft tissue and modes of failure in revision total joint arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Patrick Bettiol; Alec Egan; Cameron Cox; Eric Wait; George Brindley
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-09-22

5.  Bone infection site targeting nanoparticle-antibiotics delivery vehicle to enhance treatment efficacy of orthopedic implant related infection.

Authors:  Bin'en Nie; Shicheng Huo; Xinhua Qu; Jingjing Guo; Xi Liu; Qimin Hong; You Wang; Jianping Yang; Bing Yue
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-02-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.