| Literature DB >> 29975715 |
Hanna Berhanu1, Zebene Kiflie1, Isabel Miranda2, Ana Lourenço2, Joana Ferreira2, Sisay Feleke3, Abubeker Yimam1, Helena Pereira2.
Abstract
False banana /Ensete ventricosum [Welw.] Cheesman/ is exploited as a food crop in Ethiopia where it represents an important staple food. The plant is harvested and large amounts of biomass residues are originated, mainly from the pseudo stem (i.e., fiber bundles obtained from the leaf sheaths after being scrapped to produce starchy food) and the inflorescence stalk. These materials were studied in relation to their summative chemical composition, composition of lignin, lipophilic and polar extracts. Moreover, their structural characteristics, in view of their valorization, were scrutinized. The analytical studies were performed with the aid of FTIR, GC/MS, Py-GC/MS and SEM. The fiber bundles are aggregates of mainly long and slender fibers with low ash, extractives and lignin contents (3.8%. 4.4% and 10.5% respectively) and high holocellulose and α-cellulose contents (87.5% and 59.6% respectively). The hemicelluloses in the fibers are mostly highly acetylated xylans and the lignin is of the H-type (H:G:S, 1:0.7:0.8). This lignin composition is in line with the FTIR peaks at 1670 cm-1 and 1250 cm-1.The inflorescence stalk has high ash content (12.3% in the main stalk and 24.6% in fines) with a major proportion of potassium, high extractives (25.9%), and low lignin and α-cellulose contents (5.8% and 17.9% respectively). The stalk includes numerous starch granules in the cellular structure with the predominant presence of parenchyma. The potential valorization routes for these materials are clearly different. The fiber bundles could be used as a fiber source for paper pulp production with the possibility of a prior hemicelluloses removal while the inflorescence stalk has nutritional value for food and fodder. Furthermore, it can also be used for sugar fermentation products.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29975715 PMCID: PMC6033405 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1.
Fig 2Enset fiber bundle (A), longitudinal view of stalk (B) and cross sectional view of stalk (C).
Fig 3Structural features of enset fiber bundles and pseudo stem.
(A) SEM longitudinal observation of various fiber bundles, scale bar 200 μm (B) SEM observation of the cross section of fiber bundles, scale bar 100 μm (C) optical microscopy observation of a thin cross section of one fiber bundle, scale bar 100 μm (D) SEM observation of a longitudinal cut of one fiber bundle; scale bar 50 μm (E) optical microscopy observation of dissociated fibers from one fiber bundle, scale bar 200 μm (F) SEM observation of a cross-section of the pseudo stem; scale bar 400 μm (G) optical microscopy observation of dissociated cells of the pseudo stem, showing starch granules scale bar 50 μm.
Summative chemical composition (mass % o.d. material) and monosaccharide composition (molar % of total monosaccharaides) of the enset fibers and stalks (stalk main and stalk fines).
| Fiber | Stalk main | Stalk fines | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.80 | 12.30 | 24.60 | |
| 4.44 | 25.92 | 25.01 | |
| 0.43 | 1.05 | 0.81 | |
| 1.11 | 7.43 | 5.95 | |
| 2.90 | 17.44 | 18.25 | |
| 10.53 | 5.75 | 3.39 | |
| 8.22 | 3.62 | 2.11 | |
| 2.31 | 2.13 | 1.28 | |
| 87.47 | 46.73 | 46.73 | |
| 59.59 | 17.03 | 17.03 | |
| 0.66 | 3.78 | 3.21 | |
| 1.29 | 5.37 | 3.46 | |
| 0.48 | 1.71 | 1.07 | |
| 51.87 | 80.59 | 89.94 | |
| 14.25 | 8.64 | 4.59 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 0.32 | 0.54 | 0.33 | |
| 1.29 | 0.91 | 0.63 | |
| 0.69 | 1.73 | 1.07 | |
| 29.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Elemental composition of the mineral component of the enset fibers and inflorescence stalk (stalk main and stalk fines).
| Elements | Fiber | Stalk main | Stalk fines |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.15 | 0.86 | 0.73 | |
| 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.09 | |
| 0.57 | 6.09 | 5.77 | |
| 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.13 | |
| 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.14 | |
| 158.31 | 139.81 | 176.84 | |
| 1.79 | 7.18 | 8.62 | |
| 8.79 | 6.94 | 8.44 | |
| 13.93 | 18.79 | 18.51 |
Fig 4Pyrograms of the Enset ventricosum fiber bundles and inflorescence stalk (main fraction and fines).
1–2-oxo-propanal; 4 –hydroxyacetaldehyde; 6 –acetic acid; 7–1-hydroxy-propan-2-one; 11–3-hydroxypropanal; 14 –CH3-CO-CHOH-CHO; 15 –CHO-CH2-CH2-CHO; 16 –furfural; 17–2-cyclopenten-1-one; 21–2-hydroxy-2-cyclopenten-1-one; 22 –dihydro-methyl furanone isomer; 27 – 5H-furan-2-one; 28–4-hydroxy-5,6-dihydro-(2H)-pyran-2-one; 29–3-methyl-furan-2,5-dione; 31–2-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one; 33–2-hydroxy-1-methyl-1-cyclopentene-3-one; 36 –sugar derivative; 39–5-hydroxymethyldihydrofuran-2-one; 42 –sugar derivative; 47 –sugar derivative; 51–2,3-dihydrobenzofuran; 52–4-vinylguaiacol; 54 –similar to 4-allylphenol; 59–2-hydroxymethyl-5-hydroxy-2,3-dihydro-(4H)-pyran-4-one; 60 –methylindole; 67–4-vinylsyringol; 68–4-allylsyringol; 72–1,6-anhydro-β-D-glucopyranose; 73 –trans-4-propenylsyringol; 75 –Not identified; 81 –trans-sinapaldehyde.
Peak identification, retention time, origin (C-carbohydrate, S-syringyl, G-guaiacyl, H-hydroxyphenyl, NPS-undetermined phenolic, P-protein) and quantification (% of total area of the chromatogram) of the pyrolysis products from Ensete ventricosum fiber bundle and inflorescence stalk (stalk main and stalk fines).
| Peak | RT | Compound | Origin | Fiber | Stalk main | Stalk fines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.82 | 2-oxo-propanal | C | 4.6 | 4.6 | 5.6 | |
| 7.11 | Methyl vinyl ketone | C | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.61 | |
| 7.18 | Butane-2,3-dione | C | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.8 | |
| 8.14 | Hydroxyacetaldehyde | C | 7.3 | 11.0 | 11.9 | |
| 8.73 | But-(E)-2-enal | C | 0.70 | 0.86 | 0.90 | |
| 9.08 | Acetic acid | C | 8.4 | 3.3 | 2.2 | |
| 10.06 | 1-hydroxy-propan-2-one (acetol) | C | 2.0 | 6.2 | 5.3 | |
| 10.25 | Toluene | NPS | 0.23 | 0.79 | 0.58 | |
| 10.72 | Ethendiol | C | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.70 | |
| 12.64 | Ethane-1,2-diol | C | 0.89 | - | 0.18 | |
| 12.86 | 3-hydroxypropanal | C | 2.5 | 1.9 | 1.6 | |
| 13.82 | 2-oxo-3-en-butanal | C | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.56 | |
| 13.82 | 3-furaldehyde | C | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.56 | |
| 14.19 | 3-oxo-2-ol-butanal | C | 1.0 | 2.4 | 2.3 | |
| 14.19 | Butandial | C | 1.0 | 2.4 | 2.3 | |
| 14.76 | Furfural | C | 1.0 | 0.88 | 0.76 | |
| 14.76 | 2-cyclopenten-1-one | C | 1.0 | 0.88 | 0.76 | |
| 16.01 | Furfuryl alcohol | C | 0.31 | 0.82 | 0.79 | |
| 17.49 | 4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione | C | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.24 | |
| 17.64 | Similar to 4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione | C | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.27 | |
| 18.46 | 2-hydroxy-2-cyclopenten-1-one | C | 1.4 | 3.1 | 2.8 | |
| 19.2 | Dihydro-methyl furanone isomer | C | 0.67 | 0.82 | 1.05 | |
| 19.45 | Unidentified sugar-derived | C | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 | |
| 19.45 | 5-methyl-2-furaldehyde | C | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 | |
| 19.53 | Sugar derived (m/z 55, 86, 114) | C | 0.50 | 0.15 | 0.15 | |
| 20.24 | Dihydro-2(3 | C | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.37 | |
| 20.62 | (5 | C | 0.54 | 1.1 | 1.0 | |
| 21.39 | 4-hydroxy-5,6-dihydro-(2 | C | 1.2 | 0.25 | 0.55 | |
| 21.37 | 3-methyl-furan-2,5-dione | C | - | 0.25 | - | |
| 21.84 | (2 | C | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.22 | |
| 22.15 | 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one | C | - | 1.3 | 1.0 | |
| 22.21 | Methyl-dihydro-(2 | C | 0.46 | - | - | |
| 22.28 | 2-hydroxy-1-methyl-1-cyclopentene-3-one | C | 1.1 | 0.22 | 0.20 | |
| 23.36 | Phenol | H | 0.36 | 0.67 | 0.42 | |
| 24.16 | Guaiacol | G | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.10 | |
| 25.96 | Not identified sugar (overlapped spectra) | C | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | |
| 26.79 | 4-methylphenol (p-cresol) | H | 0.18 | 0.36 | 0.21 | |
| 26.88 | 3-methylphenol (m-cresol) | H | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.16 | |
| 27.35 | 5-hydroxymethyl dihydrofuran-2-one | C | 0.36 | 1.2 | 1.3 | |
| 28.07 | Levoglucosenone | C | 0.10 | - | - | |
| 28.32 | 4-methylguaiacol | G | 0.05 | - | - | |
| 28.59 | Unidentified sugar-derived | C | 0.40 | 1.7 | 1.3 | |
| 28.72 | 2,4-dimethylphenol (2,4-Xylenol) | H | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.12 | |
| 28.91 | 3,5-dihydroxy-2-methyl-(4 | C | 0.09 | - | - | |
| 30.46 | 3-ethylphenol | H | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.09 | |
| 30.74 | Benzoic acid | NPS | 0.09 | - | - | |
| 32.01 | Sugar derived (m/z 43, 57, 69, 82, 85, 96, 116) | C | 2.9 | - | 2.0 | |
| 32.20 | Similar to dihydro-6-methyl-2H-pyran-3(4 | C | 0.35 | 0.81 | 0.78 | |
| 33.33 | 1,4:3,6-dianhydro-α-D-glucopyranose | C | 0.43 | 0.62 | 0.62 | |
| 33.66 | Sugar-derived (m/z 43, 57, 60, 68, 73, 86) | C | 0.18 | 0.99 | 0.65 | |
| 34.15 | 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran (coumaran) | H | 1.0 | 0.61 | 0.34 | |
| 34.15 | 4-vinylguaiacol | G | 1.0 | 0.61 | 0.34 | |
| 35.84 | 5-hydroxymethylfurfural | C | 0.85 | 0.22 | 0.61 | |
| 35.84 | Similar to 4-allylphenol | H | 0.21 | - | - | |
| 36.38 | Syringol | S | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.09 | |
| 36.38 | Unidentified sugar-derived | C | 0.24 | 0.46 | 0.35 | |
| 36.63 | Indole | P | - | 0.22 | 0.11 | |
| 37.32 | Dihydro-4-hydroxy-2-(3 | C | - | 0.47 | 0.61 | |
| 38.68 | 2-hydroxymethyl-5-hydroxy-2,3-dihydro-(4 | C | 1.1 | 0.66 | 1.5 | |
| 39.64 | Methylindole | P | - | 0.09 | 0.07 | |
| 39.66 | 1,5-anhydro-arabinofuranose | C | 0.71 | 0.37 | 0.30 | |
| 40.02 | 4-methylsyringol | S | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.07 | |
| 40.47 | Vanillin | G | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.06 | |
| 40.95 | 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)propyne | G | 0.07 | - | - | |
| 41.25 | 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde | H | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.07 | |
| 41.36 | 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)propyne | G | 0.08 | - | - | |
| 45.11 | 4-vinylsyringol | S | 0.34 | 0.18 | - | |
| 45.78 | 4-allylsyringol | S | 0.15 | 0.03 | - | |
| 46.54 | P-coumaric alcohol | H | 0.11 | - | - | |
| 47.69 | S | 0.25 | - | - | ||
| 49.02 | 4-propinylsyringol | S | 0.09 | - | - | |
| 49.31 | 1,6-anhydro-β-D-glucopyranose | C | 17.1 | 5.4 | 11.4 | |
| 49.82 | S | - | 0.10 | - | ||
| 51.01 | Syringaldehyde | S | 0.31 | 0.03 | - | |
| 52.86 | Unidentified | - | 1.2 | 0.1 | - | |
| 53.34 | Acetosyringone | S | 0.09 | - | - | |
| 54.65 | G | 0.09 | - | - | ||
| 54.78 | Syringylacetone | S | 0.08 | - | - | |
| 55.84 | Propiosyringone | S | 0.02 | - | - | |
| 56.33 | Syringyl vinyl ketone | S | 0.01 | - | - | |
| 62.89 | S | 0.11 | - | - | ||
| 67.4 | 61.8 | 69.5 | ||||
| 6.1 | 4.6 | 2.7 | ||||
| 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.4 | ||||
| 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | ||||
| 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | ||||
| 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | ||||
| 1:0.7:0.8 | 1:0.4:0.2 | 1:0.4:0.1 | ||||
Composition (% of total peak area) of TMS-derivatized dichloromethane extracts from Ensete ventricosum fibers and inflorescence stalk (stalk main and stalk fines).
| Compounds | Fiber | Stalk main | Stalk fines |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-Hydroxybenzyl alcohol | 0.30 | - | - |
| 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde | 0.47 | - | - |
| 3,5-Dimethoxy-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde | 0.41 | - | - |
| 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzoic acid | 0.42 | - | - |
| 3,5-Dimethoxy-4-hydroxybenzoic acid | 0.37 | - | - |
| 1-Dodecanol | 0.20 | - | - |
| 1-Tetradecanol | - | 0.11 | - |
| 1-Hexadecanol | 1.35 | 0.29 | 0.37 |
| 1-Heptadecanol | - | 0.18 | - |
| 1-Octadecanol | 1.22 | 0.28 | 0.39 |
| 1-Eicosanol | 0.41 | - | - |
| 1-Tetracosnaol | 0.67 | - | - |
| Decanoic acid | 0.24 | 0.10 | - |
| Dodecanoic acid | 0.34 | - | - |
| Tetradecanoic acid | 1.56 | 0.58 | 0.51 |
| Pentadecanoic acid | 1.97 | 1.18 | 0.87 |
| Hexadecanoic acid | 10.12 | 17.67 | 24.11 |
| Heptadecanoic acid | 1.67 | 1.09 | 0.87 |
| Octadecanoic acid | 3.98 | 6.23 | 10.98 |
| Nonadecanoic acid | 0.46 | 0.21 | - |
| Eicosanoic acid | 2.42 | 1.78 | 1.30 |
| Heneicosanoic acid | 1.88 | 1.01 | - |
| Docosanoic acid | 2.30 | 1.63 | 0.89 |
| Tricosanoic acid | 1.45 | 1.08 | - |
| Tetracosanoic acid | 2.22 | 1.81 | - |
| Pentacosanoic acid | 0.55 | 0.27 | - |
| Hexacosanoic acid | 0.55 | - | - |
| ω-Hydroxyoctadecanoic acid, methyl ester | - | 0.2 | - |
| - | 0.10 | - | |
| 9-Tetradecenoic acid | 0.70 | - | - |
| 13-Methyl-9-tetradecenoic acid | - | 0.07 | - |
| 9-Hexadecenoic acid | 2.40 | 1.61 | 1.15 |
| 10-Heptadecenoic acid | 0.87 | 0.68 | 0.56 |
| 9-Octadecenoic acid | - | 21.54 | 21.87 |
| 10-Nonadecenoic acid | - | 0.10 | - |
| 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid | 11.73 | 1.03 | 5.38 |
| 13-Docosenoic acid | - | 0.49 | - |
| 4-Pentenoic acid | 0.09 | - | - |
| Nonanedioic acid | 0.41 | 0.08 | - |
| Campesterol | 2.09 | 3.51 | 3.98 |
| Stigmasterol | 3.73 | 5.68 | 4.79 |
| β -Sitosterol | 9.05 | 12.79 | 15.54 |
| Fucosterol | 0.70 | 0.82 | - |
| Cycloartenol | - | 0.80 | - |
| ni sterol1 | 0.11 | 0.75 | 0.63 |
| ni sterol2 | - | 0.19 | - |
| ni sterol3 | - | 0.51 | - |
| Isochiapin B | - | 0.06 | - |
| Dehydroabietic acid | 0.90 | - | - |
| ni sugar 1 | 0.15 | - | - |
| ni sugar 2 | - | 0.15 | - |
| ni sugar 3 | - | 0.10 | - |
| ni sugar 4 | - | 0.33 | 0.61 |
| Sitosteryl-3β -D-Glucopyranoside | 2.22 | 0.35 | - |
| Campesteryl.3β -D-glucopyranoside | 0.24 | - | - |
| Stigmasteryl-3β -D-glucopyranoside | 0.25 | - | - |
Ethanol-water extraction yield, total phenolics, tannins, flavonoids and monosaccharides contents, and antioxidant activity of Ensete ventricosum fiber and inflorescence stalk (stalk main and stalk fibers).
| Fibers | Stalk main | Stalk fines | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extraction yield (%) | 1.85 | 17.64 | 13.73 |
| Total phenolics (mg GAE/g of extract) | 38.22 | 17.61 | 23.01 |
| Tannins (mg catechin/g of extract) | 0 | 5.88 | 5.79 |
| Hydrolysable tannins (mg of tannic acid/g of extract) | 0 | 24.85 | 0 |
| Flavonoids (mg catechin /g of extract) | 19.2 | 5.34 | 44.42 |
| Antioxidant capacity TEAC (mg Trolox/ g of extract) | 142.11 | 22.255 | 23.41 |
| IC50 value (μg extract /ml) | 67.51 | 214.62 | 154.55 |
| Total monosaccharides (mg/g of extract) | 63.76 | 30.63 | 5.79 |
Fig 5FTIR/ATR spectra of enset fiber bundles and enset inflorescence stalk.
Fig 6Graphical comparison of enset fiber bundle and inflorescence stalk chemical composition with other biomass sources.