Literature DB >> 29975571

Continued Improvements in Quadriceps Strength and Biomechanical Symmetry of the Knee After Postoperative Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation: Is It Time to Reconsider the 6-Month Return-to-Activity Criteria?

Michael T Curran1, Lindsey K Lepley1,2, Riann M Palmieri-Smith1,3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Patients who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) present with strength and biomechanical deficits at return to activity (RTA). Deficits in strength and biomechanical symmetry impair function during activity and may predispose patients to subsequent injury.
OBJECTIVE: To compare strength and biomechanical function in patients with ACLR at RTA and more than 12 months post-ACLR.
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 20 participants (12 females, 8 males; age = 21.40 ± 5.60 years, height = 171.3 ± 10.2 cm, mass = 73.21 ± 19.41 kg) who had undergone ACLR and were cleared to RTA were recruited. INTERVENTION(S): Strength was measured during knee extension and evaluated by the isometric and isokinetic quadriceps index. Biomechanical function was evaluated using symmetry values for sagittal-plane knee-joint rotations, changes in sagittal-plane knee-joint rotation, knee-extension moments, and changes in knee-extension moment that were recorded during a single-legged forward hop. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Self-reported function was measured using the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form. Participants were assessed at RTA (212.25 ± 28.11 days) and more than 12 months post-ACLR (556.25 ± 230.89 days).
RESULTS: At RTA, strength and biomechanical values were less than 80% symmetric. We observed improvements from RTA to more than 12 months post-ACLR for the isometric quadriceps index ( F1,18 = 29.22, P < .001), isokinetic quadriceps index ( F1,18 = 10.88, P = .004), sagittal-plane knee-joint rotations ( F1,19 = 9.58, P = .006), change in sagittal-plane knee-joint rotations ( F1,19 = 7.83, P = .01), knee-extension moments ( F1,19 = 5.73, P = .03), change in knee-extension moments ( F1,19 = 21.10, P < .001), and self-perceived function ( F1,19 = 11.50, P = .003). Of the 7 variables that showed improvement at more than 12 months post-ACLR, only 3 met the recommended criteria (≥90%).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ACLR showed asymmetry in strength and biomechanics at RTA. These asymmetries, along with self-perceived function, improved over time. However, despite improvements in strength and biomechanics at RTA, asymmetries of more than 10% were still present more than 12 months post-ACLR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  asymmetry; recurrent injury; return to activity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29975571      PMCID: PMC6089034          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-478-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  40 in total

1.  Understanding and preventing noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a review of the Hunt Valley II meeting, January 2005.

Authors:  Letha Y Griffin; Marjorie J Albohm; Elizabeth A Arendt; Roald Bahr; Bruce D Beynnon; Marlene Demaio; Randall W Dick; Lars Engebretsen; William E Garrett; Jo A Hannafin; Tim E Hewett; Laura J Huston; Mary Lloyd Ireland; Robert J Johnson; Scott Lephart; Bert R Mandelbaum; Barton J Mann; Paul H Marks; Stephen W Marshall; Grethe Myklebust; Frank R Noyes; Christopher Powers; Clarence Shields; Sandra J Shultz; Holly Silvers; James Slauterbeck; Dean C Taylor; Carol C Teitz; Edward M Wojtys; Bing Yu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MOON cohort study.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Warren R Dunn; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; John Bergfeld; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Michelle Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Pre-operative quadriceps activation is related to post-operative activation, not strength, in patients post-ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Lindsey K Lepley; Riann M Palmieri-Smith
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Quantitation of central activation failure during maximal voluntary contractions in humans.

Authors:  J A Kent-Braun; R Le Blanc
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Combination of eccentric exercise and neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve quadriceps function post-ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Lindsey K Lepley; Edward M Wojtys; Riann M Palmieri-Smith
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Application of the joint coordinate system to three-dimensional joint attitude and movement representation: a standardization proposal.

Authors:  G K Cole; B M Nigg; J L Ronsky; M R Yeadon
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Does concomitant meniscectomy or meniscal repair affect the recovery of quadriceps function post-ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Lindsey K Lepley; Edward M Wojtys; Riann M Palmieri-Smith
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Strength Asymmetry and Landing Mechanics at Return to Sport after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Laura C Schmitt; Mark V Paterno; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Clinical thresholds for quadriceps assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher Kuenze; Jay Hertel; Susan Saliba; David R Diduch; Arthur Weltman; Joseph M Hart
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 1.931

10.  Gait patterns differ between ACL-reconstructed athletes who pass return-to-sport criteria and those who fail.

Authors:  Stephanie L Di Stasi; David Logerstedt; Emily S Gardinier; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  8 in total

1.  Confidence to Return to Play After ACL Reconstruction: An Evaluation of Quadriceps Strength Symmetry and Injury Mechanism in Male Athletes.

Authors:  Rachel K Straub; Francesco Della Villa; Bert Mandelbaum; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 4.355

2.  Pre-operative knee extensor and flexor torque after secondary ACL rupture: a comparative retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Marlene Mauch; Ramona Ritzmann; Jochen Paul; Christoph Centner; Christophe Lambert; Markus Wenning; Clara Ebner; Leonie Hartl; Albrecht H Heitner
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-19

3.  A Cross-sectional Examination of Quadriceps Strength, Biomechanical Function, and Functional Performance From 9 to 24 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael T Curran; Asheesh Bedi; Megan Kujawa; Riann Palmieri-Smith
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  CRITERIA-BASED RETURN TO SPRINTING PROGRESSION FOLLOWING LOWER EXTREMITY INJURY.

Authors:  Daniel Lorenz; Steve Domzalski
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-04

5.  Test Batteries After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chelsey Roe; Cale Jacobs; Johanna Hoch; Darren L Johnson; Brian Noehren
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.843

6.  Greater subchondral vBMD at the tibia is observed between 1 and 5 years of anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Lee A Weidauer; Zach M Harbaugh; Nathan A Koens
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.864

7.  Isometric Knee Muscle Strength and Patient-Reported Measures Five Years after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Single versus Dual Autograft Hamstring Tendon Harvesting.

Authors:  Ignacio Manchado; Luci M Motta; Gustavo Blanco; Jesús González; Gerardo L Garcés
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Risk Factors for Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Pediatric Population: A Prediction Algorithm.

Authors:  Nicholas J Lemme; Daniel S Yang; Brooke Barrow; Ryan O'Donnell; Alan H Daniels; Aristides I Cruz
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.