Literature DB >> 29975093

Brain activation covaries with reported criminal behaviors when making risky choices: A fuzzy-trace theory approach.

Valerie F Reyna1, Rebecca K Helm1, Rebecca B Weldon1, Pooja D Shah1, Alexa G Turpin1, Shravya Govindgari1.   

Abstract

Criminal behavior has been associated with abnormal neural activity when people experience risks and rewards or exercise inhibition. However, neural substrates of mental representations that underlie criminal and noncriminal risk-taking in adulthood have received scant attention. We take a new approach, applying fuzzy-trace theory, to examine neural substrates of risk preferences and criminality. We extend ideas about gist (simple meaning) and verbatim (precise risk-reward tradeoffs) representations used to explain adolescent risk-taking to uncover neural correlates of developmentally inappropriate adult risk-taking. We tested predictions using a risky-choice framing task completed in the MRI scanner, and examined neural covariation with self-reported criminal and noncriminal risk-taking. As predicted, risk-taking was correlated with a behavioral pattern of risk preferences called "reverse framing" (preferring sure losses over a risky option and a risky option over sure gains, the opposite of typical framing biases) that has been linked to risky behavior in adolescents and is rarely observed in nondisordered adults. Experimental manipulations confirmed processing interpretations of typical framing (gist-based) and reverse-framing (verbatim-based) risk preferences. In the brain, covariation with criminal and noncriminal risk-taking was observed predominantly when subjects made reverse-framing choices. Noncriminal risk-taking behavior was associated with emotional reactivity (amygdala) and reward motivation (striatal) areas, whereas criminal behavior was associated with greater activation in temporal and parietal cortices, their junction, and insula. When subjects made more developmentally typical framing choices, reflecting nonpreferred gist processing, activation in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex covaried with criminal risk-taking, which may reflect cognitive effort to process gist while inhibiting preferred verbatim processing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29975093      PMCID: PMC6044465          DOI: 10.1037/xge0000434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  79 in total

1.  Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Neural processing of risk.

Authors:  Peter N C Mohr; Guido Biele; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Three parietal circuits for number processing.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Manuela Piazza; Philippe Pinel; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Aberrant neural processing of moral violations in criminal psychopaths.

Authors:  Carla L Harenski; Keith A Harenski; Matthew S Shane; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2010-11

5.  Informatic parcellation of the network involved in the computation of subjective value.

Authors:  John A Clithero; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Explaining contradictory relations between risk perception and risk taking.

Authors:  Britain Mills; Valerie F Reyna; Steven Estrada
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-05

Review 7.  Rewiring juvenile justice: the intersection of developmental neuroscience and legal policy.

Authors:  Alexandra O Cohen; B J Casey
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  The posteromedial region of the default mode network shows attenuated task-induced deactivation in psychopathic prisoners.

Authors:  Scott M Freeman; David V Clewett; Craig M Bennett; Kent A Kiehl; Michael S Gazzaniga; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  The role of the right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction as revealed by ALE meta-analysis.

Authors:  S C Krall; C Rottschy; E Oberwelland; D Bzdok; P T Fox; S B Eickhoff; G R Fink; K Konrad
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 10.  The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Shulman; Ashley R Smith; Karol Silva; Grace Icenogle; Natasha Duell; Jason Chein; Laurence Steinberg
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 6.464

View more
  2 in total

1.  Supporting Health and Medical Decision Making: Findings and Insights from Fuzzy-Trace Theory.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Sarah Edelson; Bridget Hayes; David Garavito
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.749

2.  Explaining risky choices with judgments: Framing, the zero effect, and the contextual relativity of gist.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Charles J Brainerd; Ziyi Chen; Sarah H Bookbinder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.140

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.