Literature DB >> 29974869

Impact of new ICRU Report 90 recommendations on calculated correction factors for reference dosimetry.

Damian Czarnecki1, Björn Poppe, Klemens Zink.   

Abstract

In 2016 the ICRU published a new report dealing with key data for ionizing radiation dosimetry (ICRU Report 90). New recommendations have been made for the mean excitation energies I for air, graphite and liquid water as well as for the graphite density to use when evaluating the density effect. In addition, the ICRU Report 90 discusses renormalized photoelectric cross sections, but refuses to give a recommendation on the use of renormalization factors. However, the Consultative Committee for Ionizing Radiation recommends to use renormalized photoeffect cross sections. Goal of the present work is to evaluate the impact of these new recommendations on clinical reference dosimetry for high energy photon and electron beams. The beam quality correction factor k Q was calculated by Monte Carlo simulations for compact and parallel plate ionization chambers. In case of photons seven phase space files from clinical accelerators and twelve spectra taken from literature from 4 MV to 24 MV and additionally a 60Co source were applied. As electron source thirteen electron spectra available in literature were used in the range of 4 MeV-21 MeV. The new ICRU recommendations have a small impact on Monte Carlo calculated k Q values for the chosen ionization chambers in the range of 0.1%-0.35% only-the difference increases for higher photon energies. The impact of the ICRU Report 90 recommendations on Monte Carlo calculated stopping power ratios s w,a , perturbation factors p and beam quality correction factors k Q was investigated and confirmed a decrese of s w,a by a fraction of a percent for photon and electron beams. This study indicates that the impact of the new ICRU recommendation is within 0.35%. The determined deviations should be taken into account, when widely published Monte Carlo calculated values are examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29974869     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of penh, fluka, and Geant4/topas for absorbed dose calculations in air cavities representing ionization chambers in high-energy photon and proton beams.

Authors:  Kilian-Simon Baumann; Felix Horst; Klemens Zink; Carles Gomà
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluating the Impact of Ionization Chamber-Specific Beam Quality Correction Factor in Dosimetry of Filtered and Unfiltered Photon Beams.

Authors:  Richa Sharma; Sunil Dutt Sharma; Priyanka Agarwal; Devesh Kumar Avasthi; Rohit Verma
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2022-08-05

3.  Small field output correction factors of the microSilicon detector and a deeper understanding of their origin by quantifying perturbation factors.

Authors:  Carolin Weber; Rafael Kranzer; Jan Weidner; Kevin Kröninger; Björn Poppe; Hui Khee Looe; Daniela Poppinga
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.