| Literature DB >> 29973195 |
Khadijeh Rabiei1, Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh2, Majid Saeedi2, Adele Bahar3, Ozra Akha3, Zahra Kashi4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the effects of a hydroalcoholic extract of Juglans regia L. leaves on blood glucose level and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients.Entities:
Keywords: Avicel; Blood glucose; Blood pressure; Cardiovascular; Diabetes mellitus; Herbal medicine; Juglans regia; Microcrystalline cellulose; Walnut leaves; Weight
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29973195 PMCID: PMC6031195 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2268-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Baseline participant data in two arms, Juglans regia leaves group and control group (n = 50)
| Variable | placebo group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | 74.5 ± 15.4 | 73.1 ± 9.2 | 0.744 |
| BMI (kg/cm2) | 29.7 ± 5.8 | 30.2 ± 3.8 | 0.738 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 126.4 ± 9.1 | 121.7 ± 10.5 | 0.153 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 79.7 ± 6.7 | 76.7 ± 9.8 | 0.275 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) | 195.2 ± 38.2 | 205 ± 51.9 | 0.500 |
| Postprandial blood glucose (mg/dl) | 283.8 ± 45.5 | 303.2 ± 68.1 | 0.323 |
| HbA1C (%) | 9.6 ± 1.1 | 9.8 ± 0.8 | 0.421 |
| Insulin level | 7.2 ± 5 | 6.4 ± 3.2 | 0.598 |
| HOMA IR | 3.6 ± 2.9 | 2.9 ± 1.6 | 0.451 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.671 |
| Hemoglobin (mg/dl) | 12.8 ± 1.8 | 12.4 ± 1.3 | 0.458 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 176.4 ± 39.7 | 183.4 ± 31.5 | 0.547 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 180 ± 81.7 | 167.8 ± 76.6 | 0.631 |
| HDL Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 49.3 ± 8.9 | 46 ± 12.8 | 0.336 |
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 92.5 ± 30.1 | 102.2 ± 22.3 | 0.257 |
| AST (U/L) | 18.9 ± 4 | 24.4 ± 9.7 | 0.022 |
| ALT (U/L) | 20 ± 6.2 | 25.2 ± 13 | 0.114 |
| ALP (IU/L) | 196.9 ± 59.1 | 214.1 ± 55.1 | 0.347 |
| TSH (IU/L) | 2.2 ± 1.2 | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 0.716 |
Fig. 1Study flow diagram based on the CONSORT 2010 flow diagram
Participant data before and after intervention in the case group (extract of Juglans regia leaves) and the placebo group (Avicel)
| Variable | Juglans regia leaves group┼ ( | placebo group ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention Mean ± SD | After intervention Mean ± SD | Before intervention Mean ± SD | After intervention Mean ± SD | |||
| Weight (kg) | 73.0 ± 15.1 |
|
| 73.2 ± 9.2 | 72.3 ± 8.7 | 0.303 |
| BMI (kg/cm2) | 29.2 ± 6.0 |
|
| 30.3 ± 3.9 | 29.9 ± 4.0 | 0.336 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 126.1 ± 9.5 |
|
| 121.8 ± 10.6 | 120.6 ± 9.7 | 0.637 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 79.2 ± 6.7 | 77.4 ± 4.8 | 0.185 | 76.8 ± 9.8 | 79.7 ± 4.8 | 0.116 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) | 191.7 ± 36.6 | 179.5 ± 49.0 | 0.309 | 205.1 ± 51.9 | 194.6 ± 64.8 | 0.447 |
| Postprandial blood glucose (mg/dl) | 283.2 ± 46.8 | 307.7 ± 99.0 | 0.249 | 303.2 ± 68.2 |
|
|
| HbA1C (%) | 9.6 ± 1.1 | 9.5 ± 1.8 | 0.646 | 9.90 ± 0.9 |
|
|
| Insulin level | 6.4 ± 3.7 | 7.3 ± 3.9 | 0.447 | 6.2 ± 3.3 | 4.5 ± 3.1 | 0.139 |
| HOMA IR | 3.3 ± 2.7 | 2.9 ± 2.2 | 0.186 | 3.0 ± 1.7 | 2.7 ± 1.4 | 0.395 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.474 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.270 |
| Hemoglobin (mg/dl) | 12.8 ± 1.9 | 13.2 ± 2.0 | 0.119 | 12.5 ± 1.3 | 12.3 ± 1.2 | 0.601 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 176.5 ± 41.8 | 169.0 ± 30.5 | 0.413 | 183.4 ± 31.6 | 176.5 ± 35.8 | 0.495 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 179.7 ± 86.1 | 170.6 ± 81.9 | 0.622 | 167.8 ± 76.7 | 184.1 ± 105.6 | 0.276 |
| HDL Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 49.0 ± 9.3 | 51.1 ± 9.1 | 0.337 | 44.9 ± 12.2 | 46.2 ± 13.6 | 0.710 |
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 93.2 ± 31.6 | 83.5 ± 16.0 | 0.151 | 102.3 ± 22.3 | 93.0 ± 15.7 | 0.187 |
| AST (U/L) | 19.1 ± 4.2 | 19.2 ± 6.2 | 0.902 | 23.9 ± 9.6 | 19.4 ± 6.7 | 0.056 |
| ALT (U/L) | 20.7 ± 6.5 | 20.2 ± 8.1 | 0.803 | 24.7 ± 12.4 |
|
|
| ALP (IU/L) | 200.7 ± 61.3 | 197.4 ± 68.0 | 0.817 | 202.9 ± 51.1 | 194..6 ± 64.2 | 0.594 |
| TSH (IU/L) | 2.2 ± 1.2 | – | – | 2.4 ± 0.9 | – | – |
┼ There were no significant differences in any of the variables between the two groups at the end of the study
These entries are in boldface because these variables significantly changed after internention (p value <0.05)