Literature DB >> 29972616

An efficient and accurate method for robust inter-dataset brain extraction and comparisons with 9 other methods.

Philip Novosad1,2, D Louis Collins1,2.   

Abstract

Brain extraction is an important first step in many magnetic resonance neuroimaging studies. Due to variability in brain morphology and in the appearance of the brain due to differences in scanner acquisition parameters, the development of a generally applicable brain extraction algorithm has proven challenging. Learning-based brain extraction algorithms in particular perform well when the target and training images are sufficiently similar, but often perform worse when this condition is not met. In this study, we propose a new patch-based multi-atlas segmentation method for brain extraction which is specifically developed for accurate and robust processing across datasets. Using a diverse collection of labeled images from 5 different datasets, extensive comparisons were made with 9 other commonly used brain extraction methods, both before and after applying error correction (a machine learning method for automatically correcting segmentation errors) to each method. The proposed method performed equal to or better than the other methods in each of two segmentation scenarios: a challenging inter-dataset segmentation scenario in which no dataset-specific atlases were used (mean Dice coefficient 98.57%, volumetric correlation 0.994 across datasets following error correction), and an intra-dataset segmentation scenario in which only dataset-specific atlases were used (mean Dice coefficient 99.02%, volumetric correlation 0.998 across datasets following error correction). Furthermore, combined with error correction, the proposed method runs in less than one-tenth of the time required by the other top-performing methods in the challenging inter-dataset comparisons. Validation on an independent multi-centre dataset also confirmed the excellent performance of the proposed method.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  accurate; brain extraction; efficient; error correction; fast; multi-atlas segmentation; patch-based label fusion; robust; skull stripping

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29972616      PMCID: PMC8022276          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  48 in total

1.  BrainSuite: an automated cortical surface identification tool.

Authors:  David W Shattuck; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation.

Authors:  Pierrick Coupé; José V Manjón; Vladimir Fonov; Jens Pruessner; Montserrat Robles; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A comparison of accurate automatic hippocampal segmentation methods.

Authors:  Azar Zandifar; Vladimir Fonov; Pierrick Coupé; Jens Pruessner; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Multi-atlas skull-stripping.

Authors:  Jimit Doshi; Guray Erus; Yangming Ou; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Cheng-Yi Liu; Paul M Thompson; Zhuowen Tu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Adaptive non-local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels.

Authors:  José V Manjón; Pierrick Coupé; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; D Louis Collins; Montserrat Robles
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Simple paradigm for extra-cerebral tissue removal: algorithm and analysis.

Authors:  Aaron Carass; Jennifer Cuzzocreo; M Bryan Wheeler; Pierre-Louis Bazin; Susan M Resnick; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration.

Authors:  Brian B Avants; Nicholas J Tustison; Gang Song; Philip A Cook; Arno Klein; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The preprocessed connectomes project repository of manually corrected skull-stripped T1-weighted anatomical MRI data.

Authors:  Benjamin Puccio; James P Pooley; John S Pellman; Elise C Taverna; R Cameron Craddock
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 6.524

View more
  3 in total

1.  An efficient and accurate method for robust inter-dataset brain extraction and comparisons with 9 other methods.

Authors:  Philip Novosad; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Accurate and robust segmentation of neuroanatomy in T1-weighted MRI by combining spatial priors with deep convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Philip Novosad; Vladimir Fonov; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Automated brain extraction of multisequence MRI using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Fabian Isensee; Marianne Schell; Irada Pflueger; Gianluca Brugnara; David Bonekamp; Ulf Neuberger; Antje Wick; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Sabine Heiland; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Philipp Kickingereder
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 5.038

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.