| Literature DB >> 29972461 |
Adelita Campos Araújo1, Marcos Marreiro Villela1, Ângela Sena-Lopes1, Nara Amélia da Rosa Farias1, Laura Maria Jorge de Faria1, Luciana Farias da Costa Avila2, Maria Elisabeth Aires Berne1, Sibele Borsuk1.
Abstract
Due to the growing population of pets, especially homeless dogs and cats, zoonoses still represent a significant public health problem. Toxoplasma gondii and Toxocara spp. are epidemiologically important zoonotic agents as they are etiological factors of human toxoplasmosis and toxocariasis, respectively. These parasites remain neglected even though they are substantially prevalent in rural areas. The aim of this study was to investigate T. gondii and T. canis seroprevalence and risk factors of seropositivity in a rural population in Pelotas municipality, Brazil. The study participants (n=344) were patients of a Basic Healthcare Unit (BHU) located in Cerrito Alegre. Blood samples were collected and tested for T. gondii antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and T. canis antibodies by an indirect ELISA that targets an excreted-secreted antigen (TES). T. gondii seropositivity was 53.2%, with higher titers (1:256 - 1:1,024) in individuals who habitually eat pork, beef, or chicken, while T. canis seropositivity was 71.8% and concomitant T. gondii and T. canis seropositivity was 38.3%. Among the seropositivity risk factors assessed, only habitual undercooked meat consumption was significant (p = 0.046; OR = 3.7) for T. gondii and none of them were associated with T. canis seropositivity. Both parasites have a high prevalence in rural areas, which reinforces the need to invest in rural community education and health.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29972461 PMCID: PMC6029849 DOI: 10.1590/s1678-9946201860028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ISSN: 0036-4665 Impact factor: 1.846
- Socio-demographic characteristics of the study population for the presence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in a rural area of Southern Rio Grande do Sul region
| Variables | Presence of anti- |
| Unadjusted OR (CI95%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative (%) | Positive (%) | |||
|
| 0.7925 | |||
| 18-40 years | 30 (45.5) | 36 (54.5) | 1 | |
| 41 or more | 113 (47.3) | 126 (52.7) | 0.93 (0.54;1.61) | |
|
| 0.2589 | |||
| Female | 102 (49.3) | 105 (50.7) | 1 | |
| Male | 59 (43.1) | 78 (56.9) | 1.28 (0.83;1.98) | |
|
| 0.2850 | |||
| None to 8th grade | 158 (46.5) | 182 (53.5) | 1 | |
| High School and University | 3 (75) | 1 (25) | 0.29 (0.03;2.81) | |
|
| 0.8371 | |||
| No | 34 (47.9) | 37 (52.1) | 1 | |
| Yes | 127 (46.5) | 146 (53.5) | 1.06 (0.63;1.78) | |
|
| 0.4529 | |||
| (no 119) | 59 (49.6) | 60 (50.4) | 1 | |
| (yes 225) | 102 (45.3) | 123 (54.7) | 1.19 (0.76;185) | |
|
| 0.0459 | |||
| Well cooked (done) | 158 (48.1) | 171 (51.9) | 1 | |
| Rare to medium/both | 3 (20) | 12 (80) | 3.70 (1.02;13.3) | |
|
| 0.4609 | |||
| No (191) | 86 (45.1) | 105 (54.9) | 1 | |
| Yes (153) | 75 (49.1) | 78 (50.9) | 0.85 (0.56;1.30) | |
|
| ||||
| Chicken | 119 (46.1) | 139 (53.9) | 0.8689 | 1.11 (0.68;1.82) |
| Pork | 65 (42.5) | 88 (57.5) | 0.1512 | 1.37 (0.89;2.10) |
| Lamb | 26 (47.3) | 29 (52.7) | 0.9482 | 0.98 (0.55;1.74) |
| Beef | 128 (47.6) | 141 (52.4) | 0.8475 | 0.87 (0.52;1.45) |
* Liver, kidney, heart
- Association of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies titers with the habit of ingesting bovine, porcine and chicken meat, in a rural population of Southern Rio Grande do Sul region
| Titrations | Pork consumption | Beef consumption | Chicken consumption | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (%) | No (%) | p (OR) | Yes (%) | No (%) | p (OR) | Yes (%) | No (%) | p (OR) | |
| 1:32 to 1:128 | 63 (43.8%) | 81 (56.2%) | 0.0261 (2.29) | 106 (73.6%) | 38 (26.4) | 0.0414 (3.14) | 104 (72.2%) | 40 (27.8%) | 0.0301 (OR=3.37) |
| 1:256 to 1:1024 | 25 (64.1%) | 14 (35.9%) | 35 (89.7%) | 4 (10.3%) | 35 (89.7%) | 4 (10.3%) | |||
- Socio-demographic characteristics of the population studied for the presence of IgG antibodies anti-Toxocara canis in a rural area of Southern Rio Grande do Sul region
| Variables | Presence of anti- |
| Unajusted OR (CI95%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative(%) | Positive(%) | |||
|
| 0.6676 | |||
| 18-40 years | 20 (30.3) | 46 (69.7) | 1 | |
| 41 or more | 66 (27.6) | 173 (72.4) | 1.14 (0.63;2.07) | |
|
| 0.6898 | |||
| Female | 60 (29.0) | 147 (71.0) | 1 | |
| Male | 37(27.0) | 100 (73.0) | 1.10 (0.68;1.79) | |
|
| 0.8545 | |||
| No | 34 (28.8) | 84 (71.2) | 1 | |
| Yes | 63 (27.9) | 163 (72.1) | 1.05 (0.64;1.71) | |
|
| 0.4334 | |||
| No | 10 (34.5) | 19 (65.5) | 1 | |
| Yes | 87 (27.6) | 228 (72.4) | 1.38 (0.62;3.08) | |
|
| 0.7159 | |||
| No | 35 (29.4) | 84 (70.6) | 1 | |
| Yes | 62 (27.6) | 163 (72.4) | 1.10 (0.67;1.79) | |
|
| 0.7556 | |||
| Well or watering hole (322) | 91 (28.3) | 231 (71.7) | 1 | |
| Tap water (19) | 6 (31.6) | 13 (68.4) | 1.17 (0.43;3.18) | |
* Could not get all ages. ** Not all survey participants responded to their source of water