| Literature DB >> 33251175 |
Laís Giuliani Felipetto1, Pedro Irineu Teider-Junior1, Felipe Fortino Verdan da Silva2, Ana Carolina Yamakawa3, Louise Bach Kmetiuk4, Anahi Chechia do Couto1, Camila Marinelli Martins5,6, Eduarda Stankiwich Vaz1, Leila Sabrina Ullmann7, Helio Langoni3, Jorge Timenetsky8, Andrea Pires Dos Santos9, Alexander Welker Biondo9,10.
Abstract
Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii has been extensively studied in a variety of different human populations. However, no study has focused on homeless populations. Accordingly, the present study aimed to assess the seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies and the risk factors associated in homeless persons from homeless shelter of São Paulo city, southeastern Brazil. In addition, anti-HIV antibodies and associated risk of T. gondii and HIV coinfection have been evaluated. Anti-T. gondii antibodies were detected by indirect fluorescent antibody test. In addition, anti-HIV levels were tested by chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay, with positive samples confirmed by rapid immunoblot assay. Overall, IgG anti-T. gondii seropositivity was found in 43/120 (35.8%) homeless persons, with endpoint titers varying from 16 to 1,024. The only two pregnant women tested were negative for IgM by chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay, with normal parturition and clinically healthy newborns in both cases. There were no statistical differences in the risk factors for anti-T. gondii serology (p > 0.05). Anti-HIV seropositivity was found in 2/120 (1.7%) homeless persons, confirmed as HIV-1. One HIV seropositive individual was also sero-reactive to IgG anti-T. gondii, and both were negative to IgM anti-T. gondii. This is the first study that reports the serosurvey of T. gondii in homeless persons worldwide. Despite the limited sample size available in the present study, our findings have shown that the prevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in homeless persons herein was lower than the general population, probably due to homeless diet habit of eating mainly processed food intake. No statistical differences were found regarding risk factors for anti-T. gondii exposure in homeless persons. Future studies should be conducted to fully establish risk factors for anti-T. gondii exposure in homeless persons.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; Toxoplasma gondii; homeless; serology; vulnerability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33251175 PMCID: PMC7674916 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.580637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Statistical results of univariate and multiple logistic regression models of associated risk factors for seropositivity of IgG anti-T. gondii antibodies in homeless persons.
| Sex | Male | 107 | 89.2 | 41 | 38.3 | 66 | 61.7 | 0.282 | 0.48 (0.12–1.85) |
| Female | 13 | 10.8 | 3 | 23.1 | 10 | 76.9 | |||
| Marital status | Unmarried | 108 | 90.0 | 41 | 38.0 | 67 | 62.0 | 0.377 | 0.54 (0.13–2.12) |
| Accompanied | 12 | 10.0 | 3 | 25.0 | 9 | 75.0 | |||
| Racial self-declaration | White | 28 | 23.3 | 8 | 28.6 | 20 | 71.4 | 0.310 | 1.60 (0.64–4.03) |
| Non-white | 92 | 76.7 | 36 | 39.1 | 56 | 60.9 | |||
| Educational background | None to 8th grade | 91 | 75.8 | 34 | 37.4 | 57 | 62.6 | 0.438 | 0.72 (0.32–1.64) |
| High School and University | 29 | 24.2 | 9 | 31.0 | 20 | 69.0 | |||
| Income | No income | 100 | 84.7 | 37 | 37.0 | 63 | 63.0 | 0.879 | 1.08 (0.38–3.03) |
| With income | 18 | 15.3 | 7 | 38.9 | 11 | 61.1 | |||
| City of origin | São Paulo city | 38 | 31.9 | 12 | 31.6 | 26 | 68.4 | 0.404 | 1.41 (0.62–3.02) |
| Other cities | 81 | 68.1 | 32 | 39.5 | 49 | 60.5 | |||
| Travel to other cities | Yes | 23 | 20.2 | 9 | 39.1 | 14 | 60.9 | 0.799 | 1.13 (0.44–2.89) |
| No | 91 | 79.8 | 33 | 36.3 | 58 | 63.7 | |||
| Contact with family | Yes | 66 | 55.5 | 23 | 34.8 | 43 | 65.2 | 0.582 | 1.22 (0.58–2.59) |
| No | 53 | 44.5 | 21 | 39.6 | 32 | 60.4 | |||
| Causes for becoming homeless | Alcohol and drugs | 28 | 23.3 | 9 | 32.1 | 19 | 67.9 | 0.736 | 1.16 (0.47–2.89) |
| Family conflicts | 48 | 40.0 | 19 | 39.6 | 29 | 60.4 | 0.360 | 0.69 (0.32–1.51) | |
| Housing loss | 13 | 10.8 | 3 | 23.1 | 10 | 76.9 | 0.347 | 1.89 (0.49–7.33) | |
| Other | 18 | 15.0 | 9 | 50.0 | 9 | 50.0 | 0.140 | 0.47 (0.17–1.30) | |
| Unemployment | 34 | 28.3 | 10 | 29.4 | 24 | 70.6 | 0.433 | 1.41 (0.59–3.35) | |
| Resting place | Hostel | 68 | 45.3 | 26 | 38.2 | 42 | 61.8 | 0.683 | 0.85 (0.40–1.81) |
| Street | 52 | 34.7 | 18 | 34.6 | 34 | 65.4 | 0.905 | 1.05 (0.43–2.54) | |
| Occupancy | 30 | 20 | 10 | 33.3 | 20 | 66.7 | 0.662 | 1.21 (0.50–2.90) | |
| Pregnant woman | Yes | 2 | 1.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 100.0 | 0.278 | |
| No | 118 | 98.3 | 44 | 37.3 | 74 | 62.7 | |||
| Have children | Yes | 81 | 67.5 | 33 | 40.7 | 48 | 59.3 | 0.182 | 0.57 (0.25–1.30) |
| No | 39 | 32.5 | 11 | 28.2 | 28 | 71.8 | |||
| Have own children | Live together | 4 | 5.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 100.0 | 0.087 | |
| Other people | 74 | 94.9 | 32 | 43.2 | 42 | 56.8 | |||
| Live alone | Yes | 52 | 46.0 | 19 | 36.5 | 33 | 63.5 | 0.815 | 0.91(0.42–1.97) |
| No | 61 | 54.0 | 21 | 34.4 | 40 | 65.6 | |||
| Pet owner | Yes | 26 | 22.4 | 12 | 46.2 | 14 | 53.8 | 0.231 | 0.58 (0.24–1.41) |
| No | 90 | 77.6 | 30 | 33.3 | 60 | 66.7 | |||
| Dog owner | Yes | 21 | 18.1 | 11 | 52.4 | 10 | 47.6 | 0.088 | 0.44 (0.16–1.14) |
| No | 95 | 81.9 | 31 | 32.6 | 64 | 67.4 | |||
| Cat owner | Yes | 6 | 5.2 | 2 | 33.3 | 4 | 66.7 | 0.880 | 1.14 (0.20–6.52) |
| No | 110 | 94.8 | 40 | 36.4 | 70 | 63.6 | |||
| Use of licit and/or illicit drugs | Yes | 91 | 75.8 | 35 | 38.5 | 56 | 61.5 | 0.470 | 0.72 (0.29–1.75) |
| No | 29 | 24.2 | 9 | 31.0 | 20 | 69.0 | |||
| Alcohol consumption | Yes | 52 | 43.3 | 18 | 34.6 | 34 | 65.4 | 0.471 | 0.76 (0.36–1.60) |
| Tobacco use | Yes | 32 | 26.7 | 16 | 50.0 | 16 | 50.0 | 0.068 | 0.46 (0.20–1.06) |
| Marijuana use | Yes | 31 | 25.8 | 12 | 38.7 | 19 | 61.3 | 0.784 | 0.88 (0.38–2.06) |
| Cocaine use | Yes | 34 | 28.3 | 12 | 35.3 | 22 | 64.7 | 0.844 | 1.08 (0.47–2.48) |
| Crack use | Yes | 16 | 13.3 | 7 | 43.8 | 9 | 56.2 | 0.528 | 0.71 (0.24–2.06) |
| Other drugs | Yes | 5 | 4.2 | 3 | 60.0 | 2 | 40.0 | 0.269 | 0.36 (0 05–2.30) |
| Assistance by Psychosocial Care Centers (CAPS) | Yes | 31 | 25.8 | 10 | 32.3 | 21 | 67.7 | 0.554 | 1.29 (0.54–3.08) |
| No | 89 | 74.2 | 34 | 38.2 | 55 | 61.8 | |||
| Bath frequency | Daily | 99 | 82.5 | 34 | 34.3 | 65 | 65.7 | 0.252 | 1.73 (0.67–4.50) |
| Sporadic | 21 | 17.5 | 10 | 47.6 | 11 | 52.4 | |||
| Wash clothes | Yes | 82 | 68.3 | 30 | 36.6 | 52 | 63.4 | 0.978 | 1.01 (0.45–2.24) |
| No | 38 | 31.7 | 14 | 36.8 | 24 | 63.2 | |||
| Change clothes frequency | Daily | 50 | 42.7 | 17 | 34.0 | 33 | 66.0 | 0.838 | 1.08 (0.50–2.33) |
| Sporadic | 67 | 57.3 | 24 | 35.8 | 43 | 64.2 | |||
| Body lice bite | Yes | 63 | 59.4 | 23 | 36.5 | 40 | 63.5 | 0.752 | 1.13 (0.51–2.52) |
| No | 43 | 40.6 | 17 | 39.5 | 26 | 60.5 | |||
| Presence of body lice | Yes | 17 | 14.2 | 4 | 23.5 | 13 | 76.5 | 0.225 | 2.06 (0.62–6.77) |
| No | 103 | 85.8 | 40 | 38.8 | 63 | 61.2 | |||
The percentages can go higher than 100% because individuals could answer more than one option.
Average, median, and standard deviation (SD) of T. gondii positive and negative homeless persons according to age (years), homelessness time (months), number of children, number of dogs, number of cats, packed cell volume (PCV), total plasma protein (TTP).
| Age (years) | 43.55 | 44.50 | 14.03 | 41.18 | 42.50 | 11.96 | 0.412 |
| Homelessness time (months) | 67.68 | 36.00 | 78.43 | 85.10 | 36.00 | 103.60 | 0.557 |
| Number of children | 2.19 | 1.00 | 4.02 | 2.07 | 2.00 | 2.08 | 0.385 |
| Number of dogs | 0.34 | 0.00 | 1.27 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.40 | 0.081 |
| Number of cats | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 0.928 |
| PCV | 42.46 | 42.00 | 4.00 | 42.84 | 44.00 | 4.40 | 0.629 |
| TPP | 7.65 | 7.60 | 0.63 | 7.64 | 7.60 | 0.52 | 0.918 |