| Literature DB >> 29971611 |
Wen Zheng1, Walter McKinney1, Michael L Kashon1, Daniel Pan1, Vincent Castranova2, Hong Kan3,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability (HRV) as a marker reflects the activity of the autonomic nervous system. The prognostic significance of HRV for cardiovascular disease has been reported in clinical and epidemiological studies. Our laboratory has reported alterations in rat heart rate variability (HRV) due to increasing activity of both sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system after pulmonary exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). This suggests that pulmonary inhalation of engineered nanoparticles (ENs) may lead to functional changes in the cardiovascular system. The present study further investigated the effects of inhaled MWCNTs on the cardiovascular system and evaluated the correlation between the alterations in HRV and changes in cardiovascular function.Entities:
Keywords: Blood pressure; Cardiac function; Inhalation; Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; Nanoparticles
Year: 2018 PMID: 29971611 PMCID: PMC6029995 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2603-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1A typical size distribution of the MWCNT aerosol in the sealed exposure cage which indicates a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 1.4 μm
Fig. 2a Bar graph depicting a percentage change of systolic blood pressure (SBP) during the exposure period and at 1 and 7 days after exposure from the basal level before exposure (pre-exposure control vs MWCNTs: 127.0 ± 3.0 vs 127.6 ± 1.7 mmHg). b Bar graph depicting a percentage change of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) during the exposure period and at 1 and 7 days after exposure from the basal level before exposure (pre-exposure control vs MWCNTs: 85.1 ± 2.0 vs 86.9 ± 1.2 mmHg). c Bar graph depicting a percentage change of mean blood pressure (MAP) during the exposure period and at 1 and 7 days after exposure from the basal level before exposure (pre-exposure control vs MWCNTs: 99.1 ± 2.3 vs 100.4 ± 1.4 mmHg). Each value represents the mean ± SE of eight rats. P < 0.01 compared with control group (*)
Fig. 3Line graph depicting a percentage change of stroke volume (SV) from the basal level before exposure (pre-exposure control vs MWCNTs at 1 day post: 109.3 ± 7.0 vs 106.7 ± 10.4 μl, control vs MWCNTs at 7 days post: 118.8 ± 5.7 vs 127.5 ± 3.7 μl). Each value represents the mean ± SE of eight rats. P < 0.01 exposed compared with control group at 1 day post-exposure (*)
Fig. 4Line graph depicting a percentage change of stroke work (SW) from the basal level before exposure (pre-exposure control vs MWCNTs at 1 day post: 11276 ± 1165 vs 11,151.7 ± 727.9 mmHg × μl, control vs MWCNTs at 7 days post: 13245 ± 893.4 vs 13,644.2 ± 536.5 mmHg × μl). Each value represents the mean ± SE of eight rats. P < 0.01 exposed compared with control group at 1 day post-exposure (*)
Fig. 5Line graph depicting a percentage change of cardiac output (CO) from the basal level before exposure (pre-exposure control vs MWCNTs at 1 day post: 42243.3 ± 4500.1 vs 40,556.6 ± 2308.8 μl/min, control vs MWCNTs at 7 days post: 44903.3 ± 2906.0 vs 46,210 ± 1624.8 μl/min). Each value represents the mean ± SE of eight rats. P < 0.01 exposed compared with control group at 1 day post-exposure (*)
Fig. 6Line graph depicting a percentage change of mean blood pressure (MBP) from the basal level before exposure (control vs MWCNTs at 1 day post: 97.7 ± 2.8 vs 98.1 ± 2.6, control vs MWCNTs at 7 days post: 102.5 ± 4.2 vs 100.9 ± 5.5). Each value represents the mean ± SE of eight rats