Literature DB >> 16053957

Remote ischemic preconditioning provides early and late protection against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans: role of the autonomic nervous system.

Stavros P Loukogeorgakis1, Anna T Panagiotidou, Michael W Broadhead, Ann Donald, John E Deanfield, Raymond J MacAllister.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize the time course and neuronal mechanism of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) of the vasculature in humans.
BACKGROUND: Non-lethal ischemia of internal organs induces local (ischemic preconditioning) and systemic (RIPC) resistance to lethal ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. Experimental RIPC has two temporal components, is neuronally mediated, is induced by limb ischemia, and reduces infarct size. In humans, RIPC prevents IR-induced vascular injury. Determining the time course and mechanism is a prelude to clinical outcome studies of RIPC.
METHODS: Endothelial IR injury was induced by arm ischemia (20 min) and reperfusion, and measured by flow-mediated dilation. To establish if there are early and late phases, RIPC (three 5-min cycles of ischemia of the contralateral arm) was applied immediately, 4, 24, and 48 h before IR. To determine neuronal involvement, trimetaphan (autonomic ganglion blocker; 1 to 6 mg/min intravenous) was infused during the application of the RIPC stimulus.
RESULTS: Flow-mediated dilation was reduced by IR (8.7 +/- 1.1% before IR, 4.9 +/- 1.2% after IR; p < 0.001), but not when preceded by RIPC (8.0 +/- 0.8% after IR; p = NS); RIPC did not protect after 4 h (4.9 +/- 1.1% after IR; p < 0.001), but protected at 24 (8.7 +/- 1.1% after IR; p = NS) and 48 h (8.8 +/- 1.4% after IR; p = NS). Trimetaphan attenuated early (8.3 +/- 1.1% before IR, 4.2 +/- 0.9% after IR; p < 0.05) and delayed (7.3 +/- 1.0% before IR, 2.3 +/- 0.6% after IR, p < 0.001) RIPC.
CONCLUSIONS: Remote ischemic preconditioning in humans has two phases of protection against endothelial IR injury; an early (short) and late (prolonged) phase, both of which are neuronally mediated. The potential for late phase RIPC to provide prolonged protection during clinical IR syndromes merits investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16053957     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  128 in total

Review 1.  Remote ischemic preconditioning for kidney protection: GSK3β-centric insights into the mechanism of action.

Authors:  Zhangsuo Liu; Rujun Gong
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Seven consecutive days of remote ischaemic preconditioning improves cutaneous vasodilatory capacity in young adults.

Authors:  James A Lang; Jahyun Kim; Warren D Franke; Lauro C Vianna
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Coronary vasoregulation in health and disease.

Authors:  John G Kingma; Jacques R Rouleau
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  The evolving story of "conditioning" to protect against acute myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Remote ischaemic conditioning-therapeutic opportunities in renal medicine.

Authors:  Lisa E Crowley; Christopher W McIntyre
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 28.314

6.  Tefillin use induces remote ischemic preconditioning pathways in healthy men.

Authors:  A Phillip Owens; Nathan Robbins; Keith Saum; Shannon M Jones; Akiva Kirschner; Jessica G Woo; Connie McCoy; Samuel Slone; Marc E Rothenberg; Elaine M Urbina; Michael Tranter; Jack Rubinstein
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Protection of coronary circulation: Evaluation by PET perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Antti Saraste; Heikki Ukkonen; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Clinical application of preconditioning and postconditioning to achieve neuroprotection.

Authors:  Cameron Dezfulian; Matthew Garrett; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 6.829

9.  Muscle microdialysis to confirm sublethal ischemia in the induction of remote ischemic preconditioning.

Authors:  Arzu Bilgin-Freiert; Joshua R Dusick; Nathan R Stein; Maria Etchepare; Paul Vespa; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 6.829

10.  Involvement of neuronal pathways in the protective effects of hindlimb perconditioning during renal ischemia.

Authors:  Zahra Sedaghat; Mehri Kadkhodaee; Behjat Seifi; Parisa Ahghari; Khalil Pourkhalili; Zahra Akbari; Mehdi Sadeghi
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.