[Impact of anamnestic information and neurological deficits on the detection rate of secondary headaches].

PURPOSE: Headaches are a very common symptom and imaging is important to rule out symptomatic causes. For clinical differentiation between primary and secondary headaches an exact anamnesis and neurological examination are important. The aim of this study is therefore to identify anamnestic and neurological information that is associated with secondary headaches. Moreover, this study gives an overview of the causes and differential diagnoses of secondary headaches.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 239 patients ≥18 years with headaches who had undergone computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The impact of basic characteristics such as age and gender as well as anamnestic (pain intensity, thromboembolic risk profile) and clinical information (neurological deficit, papilledema, reduced vigilance) was tested by χ2 test at the significance level p < 0.05.
RESULTS: In all, 27 of the included patients (11.3%) showed intracranial pathologies that required treatment. The most frequent pathologies were intracranial hypertension (9 patients), cerebral mass lesions (7 patients) and thrombosis of the cranial sinus/veins (3 patients). There was a significant association of a pathologic imaging finding and neurological deficits (p = 0.001) and a papilledema (p < 0.001). Reduced vigilance, pain intensity and thromboembolic risk factors as well as age and gender showed no significant association.
CONCLUSIONS: A neurological deficit and especially papilledema are hints towards secondary headaches and should result in computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Other factors such as reduced vigilance, pain intensity, age and gender have no relevant impact on the occurrence of intracranial pathologies.