Literature DB >> 27479641

Changes in Physician Decision Making after CT: A Prospective Multicenter Study in Primary Care Settings.

Pari V Pandharipande1, Claude I Alabre1, David L Coy1, Atif Zaheer1, Chad M Miller1, Maurice S Herring1, Angela C Tramontano1, Emily C Dowling1, Jonathan D Eisenberg1, Bimal H Ashar1, Elkan F Halpern1, Karen Donelan1, G Scott Gazelle1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine the effect of computed tomography (CT) results on physician decision making in three common clinical scenarios in primary care. Materials and Methods This research was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) and was HIPAA compliant. All physicians consented to participate with an opt-in or opt-out mechanism; patient consent was waived with IRB approval. In this prospective multicenter observational study, outpatients referred by primary care providers (PCPs) for CT evaluation of abdominal pain, hematuria, or weight loss were identified. Prior to CT, PCPs were surveyed to elicit their leading diagnosis, confidence in that diagnosis (confidence range, 0%-100%), a rule-out diagnosis, and a management plan if CT were not available. Surveys were repeated after CT. Study measures were the proportion of patients in whom leading diagnoses and management changed (PCP management vs specialist referral vs emergency department transfer), median changes in diagnostic confidence, and the proportion of patients in whom CT addressed rule-out diagnoses. Regression analyses were used to identify associations between study measures and site and participant characteristics. Specifically, logistic regression analysis was used for binary study measures (change in leading diagnosis, change in management), and linear regression analysis was used for the continuous study measure (change in diagnostic confidence). Accrual began on September 5, 2012, and ended on June 28, 2014. Results In total, 91 PCPs completed pre- and post-CT surveys in 373 patients. In patients with abdominal pain, hematuria, or weight loss, leading diagnoses changed after CT in 53% (131 of 246), 49% (36 of 73), and 57% (27 of 47) of patients, respectively. Management changed in 35% (86 of 248), 27% (20 of 74), and 54% (26 of 48) of patients, respectively. Median absolute changes in diagnostic confidence were substantial and significant (+20%, +20%, and +19%, respectively; P ≤ .001 for all); median confidence after CT was high (90%, 88%, and 80%, respectively). PCPs reported CT was helpful in confirming or excluding rule-out diagnoses in 98% (184 of 187), 97% (59 of 61), and 97% (33 of 34) of patients, respectively. Significant associations between primary measures and site and participant characteristics were not identified. Conclusion Changes in PCP leading diagnoses and management after CT were common, and diagnostic confidence increased substantially. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27479641     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  [Impact of anamnestic information and neurological deficits on the detection rate of secondary headaches].

Authors:  P B Sporns; L Hälker; W Heindel; T Niederstadt; T Allkemper; R Dziewas; W Schwindt
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Understanding, justifying, and optimizing radiation exposure for CT imaging in nephrourology.

Authors:  Andrea Ferrero; Naoki Takahashi; Terri J Vrtiska; Amy E Krambeck; John C Lieske; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical Sector.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Clinical Impact of a Quality Improvement Program Including Dedicated Emergency Radiology Personnel on Emergency Surgical Management: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.

Authors:  Gil-Sun Hong; Choong Wook Lee; Ju Hee Lee; Bona Kim; Jung Bok Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 7.109

Review 5.  Radiation concerns in frequent flyer patients: should imaging history influence decisions about recurrent imaging?

Authors:  Aaron D Sodickson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.629

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.