Literature DB >> 29969496

Oncogenic c-terminal cyclin D1 (CCND1) mutations are enriched in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas.

Jia Xu1, Douglas I Lin1.   

Abstract

Cyclin D1 (CCND1) is a core cell cycle regulator and is frequently overexpressed in human cancers, often via amplification, translocation or post-transcription regulation. Accumulating evidence suggests that mutations of the CCND1 gene that result in nuclear retention and constitutive activation of CDK4/6 kinases are oncogenic drivers in cancer. However, the spectrum of CCND1 mutations across human cancers has not been systematically investigated. Here, we retrospectively mined whole-exome sequencing data from 124 published studies representing up to 29,432 cases from diverse cancer types and sites of origin, including carcinoma, melanoma, sarcoma and lymphoma/leukemia, via online tools to determine the frequency and spectrum of CCND1 mutations in human cancers and their associated clinico-pathological characteristics. Overall, in contrast to gene amplification, which occurred at a frequency of 4.8% (1,419 of 28,769 cases), CCND1 mutations were of very low frequency (0.5%, 151 of 29,432 cases) across all cancers, but were predominantly enriched in uterine endometrioid-type adenocarcinoma (6.5%, 30 of 458 cases) in both primary tumors and in advanced, metastatic endometrial cancer samples. CCND1 mutations in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma occurred most commonly in the c-terminus of cyclin D1, as putative driver mutations, in a region thought to result in oncogenic activation of cyclin D1 via inhibition of Thr-286 phosphorylation and nuclear export, thereby resulting in nuclear retention and protein overexpression. Our findings implicate oncogenic c-terminal mutations of CCND1 in the pathogenesis of a subset of human cancers and provide a key resource to guide future preclinical and clinical investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29969496      PMCID: PMC6029777          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Cyclin D1, encoded by the CCND1 gene, is a core cell cycle regulator that promotes cellular proliferation and is frequently overexpressed in human cancers. Alterations of cyclin D1 resulting in nuclear protein expression is thought to promote tumorigenesis in various types of cancers[1][2], often as a result of CCND1 gene amplification, such as in breast, lung, bladder carcinomas [3][4], or as a result of CCND1 translocation in mantle cell lymphoma [5]. Accumulating evidence also suggests that mutations of the CCND1 gene that result in nuclear retention and constitutive activation of CDK4/6 kinases are oncogenic drivers in cancer [6][7][8][9]. Oncogenic mutations of CCND1 have been previously reported in endometrial and esophageal carcinomas [10][11][12], however, the spectrum of CCND1 mutations across human cancers has not been systematically investigated. The c-terminus of cyclin D1 contains a nuclear export signal and a phospho-degron, which is a region involved in cyclin D1 phosphorylation, nuclear export, ubiquitination and protein degradation. During the S phase of the cell cycle, phosphorylation of cyclin D1 at Thr-286 by GSK3β triggers cyclin D1 nuclear export and ubitiquin-mediated proteolysis via the 26S proteasome in the cytoplasm [13][14][15]. For this reason, mutations in the c-terminus of cyclin D1 may result in oncogenic activation of cyclin D1 via inhibition of Thr-286 phosphorylation, nuclear export and protein degradation, thereby promoting cyclin D1 nuclear accumulation [6]. Nuclear retention of cyclin D1 constitutively activates CDK4/6 kinases through the cell cycle and thereby promotes cellular proliferation and tumorigenesis [12]. Specific CCND1 c-terminal mutations involving Thr286 and Pro287 have been previously reported in endometrial cancer, such as T286I, P287T, P287S, which resulted in nuclear accumulation of cyclin D1, gain-of-function and cellular transformation [10][11]. Endometrial carcinoma is the most frequently diagnosed type of gynecological malignancy, with ~40,000 new cases and 7,500 mortalities reported in the United States in 2008 [16]. Currently, there are no FDA-approved or NCCN-compendium listed treatments specifically for patients with CCND1-mutant uterine endometrioid carcinoma. However, there are clinical trials evaluating palbociclib, a CDK4/6 specific inhibitor (codenamed PD-0332991, trade name Ibrance) [2][17], including a phase 2 trial in patients with metastatic endometrial cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02730429), underscoring the importance of identifying mechanisms of CDK4 activation in endometrial cancer. Recently, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project and other whole exome studies, such as MSK-IMPACT trial, have molecularly characterized many different types of tumors, including endometrial adenocarcinomas [18][19]. The TCGA Data Portal and other publicly available online data mining programs offer a host of tools that can be used to interrogate specific genetic events relative to survival and clinico-pathological characteristics, as well as to generate hypotheses for future testing on a variety of tumor types [20][21]. The goal of this study was to mine whole-exome sequencing data from published studies representing a large number of cases and a plethora of cancer diagnoses to determine the frequency and spectrum of activating CCND1 mutations across human cancers. Here we demonstrate that activating, putative driver CCND1 mutations were of low frequency across all cancer types, but were predominantly enriched in uterine endometrioid-type adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Study type and design

With approval of a BIDMC/DFCI Institutional Review Board, we performed an observational retrospective secondary data analysis of clinically-annotated multi-platform cancer–omics datasets from the Cancer Genome Atlas Project (TCGA) and other previously published cancer genomics datasets. A total of 124 published studies with sequencing data (S1 Table), representing 29,432 cases from diverse cancer types and sites of origin, such as carcinoma, melanoma, mesothelioma, germ cell tumor, sarcoma and lymphoma/leukemia, were interrogated for CCND1 mutations. We exploited public available online tools and resources in order to data mine the cancer datasets with respect to CCND1 alterations, to interrogate different clinic-pathological characteristics relative to genomic alterations of CCND1, and to confirm the effect of specific CCND1 mutations on its biological and oncogenic function.

Cancer cohorts, gene amplification and gene mutation

Clinical and molecular data from up to 124 previously published cancer genomics studies (S1 Table) was analyzed with respect to CCND1 amplification and mutations via the cBio Cancer Genomics Portal (http://cbioportal.org; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) [20][21]. The cohorts were queried for CCND1 gene amplification or mutations in the cbio portal by using the advanced onco query language (CCND1: AMP or CCND1: MUT) [20][21]. In this manuscript, copy number gain was defined as gain of one gene copy number, while amplification was defined as gain of 2 or more gene copy numbers. Online analysis was performed between January 1st, 2015 and May 7th, 2018. CCND1 mutations specifically in primary endometrial carcinoma were interrogated via the cbio portal and via the advanced onco query language specifically in the endometrial carcinoma TCGA study with sequencing data (n = 248) [18]. In a similar manner, CCND1 mutations in advanced, metastatic endometrial carcinoma samples were interrogated specifically in the MSK IMPACT clinical cohort of advanced/metastatic endometrial carcinoma cases (n = 210) via the cBio portal [19]. In the primary endometrial carcinoma TGCA cohort, the following molecular and histological subsets were also analyzed via the cBio portal and by using the advanced onco query language: 1) complete endometrioid-type tumors (n = 232), 2) copy number high tumors (n = 60), 3) copy number low tumors (n = 90), 4) MSI (hypermutated) tumors (n = 65), 5) POLE (ultramutated) tumors (n = 17), and 6) tumors with specific serous-type histology (n = 53).

Review of pathological data

Pathology reports from the endometrial carcinoma TCGA corhort were downloaded via the cBio portal. Quality control hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images from frozen and permanent sections from TCGA cohort were re-analyzed by a board-certified gynecologic pathologist (D.L.) to confirm histological subtype via the TCGA Biosig website hosted at Lawrence Berkeley National (http://tcga.lbl.gov:8080/biosig/tcgadownload.do), and via the Cancer Digital Slide Archive (http://cancer.digitalslidearchive.net; Emory University, Atlanta, GA). Tumor stage and overall FIGO grade were also independently re-evaluated whenever possible; however, they were deferred to the available pathology reports since only limited virtual images from each case were publicly available for review. For the MSK IMPACT cohort of advanced, metastatic endometrial cancer, histological subtype was deferred to the reported subtype since H&E images were not publicly available for re-review.

Analysis of CCND1 mutations

Somatic CCND1 mutations derived from exome studies, including from TCGA and MSK IMPACT endometrial carcinoma cohorts, were retrieved via the cBio portal (http://www.cbioportal.org/public-portal/). The effect of specific somatic mutations on CCND1 function was determined by cross-referencing them to previously published reports, wherein the effect of specific CCND1 mutations on Cyclin D1 activation or gain-of-function was demonstrated either in vitro or in vivo [6][12][11]. In addition, effects of CCND1 mutations were independently queried in the online Precision Oncology Knowledge Base tool (http://www.OncoKB.org), which is a publicly available, evidence-based web resource tool that annotates and curates the biologic and oncogenic effects, as well as the predictive significance of somatic molecular alterations present in patient tumors with the goals of facilitating the interpretation of genomic alterations and supporting optimal treatment decisions [22].

Results

Frequency of CCND1 mutations across cancer

To assess frequency and spectrum of CCND1 mutations across cancer, molecular data from 124 studies (S1 Table), representing 29,432 cases/patients from diverse cancer types and sites of origin, were mined via the cBio Cancer Genomics Portal (http://cbioportal.org) [20][21]. Somatic mutation of the CCND1 gene was seen in 0.5% (151 of 29,432) of cases spanning all regions of the cyclin D1 protein (Table 1 and Fig 1A). By combining the molecular data of studies from the same cancer subtype and site of origin, the most frequently CCND1-mutated cancer subtypes were mantle cell lymphoma (34.5%, 10 of 29 cases), endometrial adenocacinoma (6.5%, 30 of 458 cases), multiple-myeloma (3.3%, 7 of 205 cases), colorectal carcinoma (1.1%, 23 of 2067 cases), melanoma (1.1%, 8 of 708 cases), skin non-melanoma cancer (1.1%, 2 of 177 cases) and uterine sarcoma (1.1%, 1 of 93 cases).
Table 1

Exome studies containing CCND1 mutations with respective cancer type and CCND1 mutation frequency.

StudyCancer type (Source, citation)CCND1 mutSample size% mutated
1Mantle Cell Lymphoma (IDIBIPS 2013)102934.5%
2Melanoma (Broad/Dana Farber, Nature 2012)2258.0%
3Endometrial Carcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2013)152486.1%
4Glioma (MSK, Neuro Oncol 2017)1224.5%
5Colorectal carcinoma (Genentech, Nature 2012)3724.2%
6Skin sq. cell carcinoma (DFCI, Clin Cancer Res 2015)1293.4%
7Multiple Myeloma (Broad, Cancer Cell 2014)72053.3%
8Stomach Adenocarcinoma (Tokyo, Nat Genet 2014)1303.3%
9NCI-60 Cell Lines (NCI, Cancer Res. 2012)2603.3%
10Skin melanoma UCLA (Cell 2016)1382.6%
11Colorectal Adenocarcinoma (DFCI 2016)156192.4%
12Rhabdomyosarcoma (NIH, Cancer Discov 2014)1432.3%
13Skin Cutaneous Melanoma (Broad, Cell 2012)21211.7%
14Low-Grade Gliomas (UCSF, Science 2014)1611.6%
15Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2014)21301.5%
16Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2012)21781.1%
17Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2014)22300.9%
18Breast cancer xenog (British Columbia, Nature 2014)11160.9%
19NSCLC (TCGA 2016)911440.8%
20Stomach/Esophageal (TCGA)45180.8%
21Cancer Cell Line Encyclop (Novartis/Broad, Nat 2012)710200.7%
22Ampulary carcinoma (BMC, 2016)11600.6%
23Lung Adenocarcinoma (Broad, Cell 2012)11830.5%
24MSK-IMPACT various tumor types (Nat Med 2017)57109450.5%
25LGG-GBM (TCGA 2016)38120.4%
26H&N Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2015)12790.4%
27Stomach Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2014)12900.3%
Fig 1

Diagrams of CCND1 mutations.

Across all human cancers analyzed (A), or specifically in the mantle cell lymphoma cohort (B), in the primary endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma TCGA cohort (C), and in the advanced or metastatic endometrial carcinoma MSK-IMPACT cohort (D).

Diagrams of CCND1 mutations.

Across all human cancers analyzed (A), or specifically in the mantle cell lymphoma cohort (B), in the primary endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma TCGA cohort (C), and in the advanced or metastatic endometrial carcinoma MSK-IMPACT cohort (D). The most commonly mutated amino acid of cyclin D1 was Proline 287, followed by Threonine 286, both of which are located in the c-terminus of cyclin D1 (Fig 1A). The third most common mutated amino acid was Tyrosine 44, which is located in the n-terminus of cyclin D1 (Fig 1A). The location of CCND1 mutations appeared to be tissue specific. In mantle cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma, the majority of CCND1 mutations occurred within the amino terminal domain of cyclin D1 (S2 Table and Fig 1B), while in endometrial adenocarcinomas, and less frequently in colorectal carcinoma and melanoma, CCND1 mutations centered on the carboxy terminal domain (Fig 1C and 1D and S1 Fig). These findings support the notion that endometrial adenocarcinomas are enriched for a unique spectrum of somatic CCND1 alterations, in which a significant number of CCND1 mutations occur in the c-terminal domain of cyclin D1 compared to other cancer subtypes.

Frequency of CCND1 amplification in cancer

Somatic CCND1 mutations occurred less frequently than CCND1 gene amplification. Overall, in contrast to somatic mutations, CCND1 gene amplification occurred at a frequency of 4.8% (1,419 of 28,769 cases/patients) across all cancers and studies with gene amplification data (Table 2). By combining the molecular data of studies from the same cancer subtype and site of origin, the most frequently CCND1-amplified cancer subtypes were head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (27.6%, 77 of 279 cases), breast cancer (16.7%, 735 of 4406 cases), bladder cancer (6.9%, 65 of 938 cases), esophageal-gastric cancer (4.8%, 72 of 1494 cases), non-small cell lung cancer (4.6%, 168 of 3648 cases), melanoma (3.3%, 23 of 708 cases), ovarian cancer (2.5%, 14 of 551 cases), appendiceal cancer (2.5%, 2 of 79 cases), hepatobiliary cancer (2.4%, 24 of 997 cases), prostate cancer (2.4%, 54 of 2262 cases) and endometrial cancer (2.3%, 11 of 480 cases).
Table 2

Exome studies containing CCND1 amplification with respective cancer type and CCND1 amplification frequency.

StudyCancer type (Source, citation)CCND1 AMPSample size% amplified
1H&N Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TCGA, Nat 2015)7727927.6%
2Meduloblastoma (Sickkids, Nature 2016)5221324.4%
3Neuroendo Prostate Cancer (Tr/Corn/Broad 2016)2310721.5%
4Breast Invasive Carcinoma (METABRIC, Nat 2012)344205116.8%
5Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA, Cell 2015)7950515.4%
6Bladder Cancer (MSKCC, J Clin Oncol 2013)149714.4%
7NCI-60 Cell Lines (NCI, Cancer Res. 2012)86013.3%
8Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TCGA, Nat 2012)2217812.4%
9Stomach/Esophageal (TCGA)3226512.1%
10Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma (TCGA, Nat 2014)1512811.7%
11Cancer Cell Line Encyclop (Nov/Broad, Nat 2012)11299511.3%
12Prostate Adenocarcinoma (Fred Hutchinson CRC)1413610.3%
13Pancreatic Cancer (UTSW, Nat Commun 2015)101099.2%
14Bladder Cancer (MSKCC, Eur Urol 2014)91098.3%
15Non-small cell lung cancer (TCGA, 2016)8911447.8%
16Metastatic prostate carcinoma (Michig, Nat 2012)4616.6%
17Stomach Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2014)182876.3%
18Liver HCC (AMC, Hepatology 2014)122315.2%
19Breast cancer xenog (British Columbia, Nat 2014)61165.2%
20Metastatic Prostate, SU2C (Cell 2015)71504.7%
21Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2014)102304.3%
22MSK-IMPACT various tumor types (Nat Med 2017)472109454.3%
23Ovarian serous carcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2011)194893.9%
24Sarcoma (MSKCC/Broad, Nat Genet 2010)72073.4%
25Endometrial Carcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2013)93632.5%
26Prostate Adenocarcinoma (TCGA, Cell 2015)73332.1%
27Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma (MSKCC, Nat Gen 2013)1601.7%
28Lung Adenocarcinoma (Broad, Cell 2012)31821.6%
29Glioblastoma (TCGA, Cell 2013)35630.5%
30Acute Myeloid Leukemia (TCGA, NEJM 2013)11910.5%
31LGG and GBM (TCGA, 2016)27940.3%

CCND1 mutations in primary endometrial adenocarcinomas

Our analysis of CCND1 mutations subsequently focused on two endometrial adenocarcinoma cohorts, since this cancer subtype was most frequently enriched for c-terminal cyclin D1 mutations (Fig 1C and 1D). First, we analyzed the primary endometrial adenocarcinoma (EMCA) cohort (n = 248) of the Cancer Genome Atlas Project (TCGA) study [18], in which CCND1 was mutated in 6.1% (15 of 248) cases (Table 1). In the TCGA EMCA cohort, the majority of CCND1 mutations (60%, 9 of 15) were located in the carboxy terminal region of cyclin D1 (Fig 1C and Table 3). Next, the pathological data was re-reviewed in terms of patient age, tumor type, stage and FIGO grade. Patient age in CCND1-mutated cases ranged from 33 to 76 years (Mean = 56; median = 58) (Table 3). The majority of CCND1-mutated cases were of stage I (73%, 11 of 15) and FIGO grade 1 or 2 tumors (40% and 47% respectively) (Table 3). A smaller percentage of CCND1-mutated primary TGCA EMCA tumors were stage III (20%, 3 of 15), stage IV (7%, 1 of 15) or FIGO grade 3 (13%, 2 of 15). For all CCND1-mutated TGCA EMCA cases, the tumors were of endometrioid histological subtype, which were confirmed by reviewing available H&E images (Fig 2).
Table 3

CCND1 mutations in primary endometrial adenocarcinomas of the TCGA cohort (n = 248) with corresponding patient clinico-pathological characteristics.

nSample IDMutationTypeEffectAgeHistologic TypeGradeStage
1AP-A0LME135DMissenseUnknown33Endometrioid2III
2AX-A0J0A171VMissenseUnknown47Endometrioid2I
3AX-A05ZF232LMissenseUnknown37Endometrioid1III
4AX-A063D240NMissenseUnknown63Endometrioid2I
5AP-A054C243RMissenseUnknown64Endometrioid2III
6BG-A0MQL244IMissenseUnknown71Endometrioid1I
7AX-A062E275*NonsenseLikely oncogenic53Endometrioid2I
8BS-A0TAE280delIF delUnknown58Endometrioid2IV
9B5-A0JVT286IMissenseOncogenic63Endometrioid1I
10D1-A0ZOT286IMissenseOncogenic75Endometrioid1I
11D1-A0ZUP287SMissenseOncogenic34Endometrioid2I
12D1-A17DP287SMissenseOncogenic58Endometrioid3I
13BS-A0TJR291dupIF insLikely oncogenic59Endometrioid3I
14D1-A16DR291_V293IF delLikely oncogenic49Endometrioid1I
15BS-A0U5V293GMissenseUnknown76Endometrioid1I

IF del = in frame deletion; FS Ins = frame shift insertion

* = truncating mutations.

Fig 2

H&E images of representative endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma cases containing activating CCND1 T286I and P287S mutations.

A (40x, case D1-A0ZO), B (400x, case D1-A0ZO) and C (40x, case B5-A0JV): grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma containing T286I mutations. D (40x, case D1-A0ZU): grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma containing P287S mutation. E (40x, case D1-A17D) and F (400x, case D1-A17D): grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma containing P287S mutation.

H&E images of representative endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma cases containing activating CCND1 T286I and P287S mutations.

A (40x, case D1-A0ZO), B (400x, case D1-A0ZO) and C (40x, case B5-A0JV): grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma containing T286I mutations. D (40x, case D1-A0ZU): grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma containing P287S mutation. E (40x, case D1-A17D) and F (400x, case D1-A17D): grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma containing P287S mutation. IF del = in frame deletion; FS Ins = frame shift insertion * = truncating mutations. The TCGA has previously stratified endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas into 4 different molecular subgroups: 1) low copy-number alterations, 2) high copy-number alterations (serous-like), 3) POLE ultramutated and 4) microsatellite instability hypermutated [18]. Within this molecular stratification system, we identified c-terminal cyclin D1 mutations in the low copy-number alterations and in the microsatellite instability hypermutated molecular subgroups (data not shown), both of which have intermediate prognosis. In contrast, no c-terminal cyclin D1 mutations were identified in the POLE ultramutated (best prognosis) and in the copy-number high, serous-like (worst prognosis) molecular subgroups (data not shown) or in TCGA tumors with specific serous-type histology (data not shown).

CCND1 mutations in advanced or metastatic endometrial carcinoma

We next interrogated the endometrial carcinoma cohort of cases from the MSK-IMPACT study in order to determine whether CCND1 c-terminal mutations also occurred in the advanced or metastatic endometrial carcinoma setting [19]. In this cohort of advanced EMCA (n = 210), CCND1 was mutated in 7% (15 of 210) cases with the majority of mutations (80%, 12 of 15) located in the c-terminus of cyclin D1 (Fig 1D and Table 4). Of the 15 total CCND1-mutated cases identified, molecular data was available in 10 metastatic sites, in which the c-terminus of CCND1 was mutated in 80% (8 of 10) metastatic EMCA sites. While H&E images were not available for re-review, the majority of CCND1-mutated MSK-IMPACT advanced or metastatic EMCA cases were reportedly of endometrioid histological subtype (86.7%, 13 of 15). Additionally, one reportedly undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma also contained a c-terminal CCND1 mutation, while an endometrial serous carcinoma contained an n-terminal cyclin D1 mutation of unknown functional significance (Table 4). The combined overall findings of both TCGA and MSK-IMPACT EMCA cohorts support the notion that CCND1 c-terminal mutations are enriched in endometrial endometrioid-type carcinomas in both primary and advanced metastatic settings.
Table 4

CCND1 mutations in advanced or metastatic endometrial carcinomas of the MSK-IMPACT cohort (n = 15) with corresponding patient clinico-pathological characteristics and CCND1 mutation effect.

nSample IDMutationTypeEffectHistologic TypeSiteStatus
1P0008646-T01T12IMissenseUnknownEndometrioidAbdominal metDeceased
2P0000230-T01N24SMissenseUnknownSerousPrimary uterusLiving
3P0012358-T01S55FMissenseUnknownEndometrioidVaginal metLiving
4P0012397-T01A171VMissenseUnknownEndometrioidPrimary uterusLiving
5P0012058-T01E275*NonsenseLikely oncogenicEndometrioidPrimary uterusLiving
6P0000069-T01E279*NonsenseLikely oncogenicEndometrioidColonic metLiving
7P0012152-T01L283_D294delIF delOncogenicEndometrioidPeritoneal metLiving
8P0001248-T01T286IMissenseOncogenicEndometrioidLymph node metLiving
9P0006849-T01T286IMissenseOncogenicUndifferentiatedPrimary uterusLiving
10P0009518-T01T286IMissenseOncogenicEndometrioidMuscle metLiving
11P0010310-T01T286IMissenseOncogenicEndometrioidPrimary uterusDeceased
12P0003767-T01P287AMissenseOncogenicEndometrioidOmental metLiving
13P0011569-T01P287SMissenseOncogenicEndometrioidPrimary uterusLiving
14P0005285-T01D289delIF delOncogenicEndometrioidPelvic metDeceased
15P0005285-T02D289delIF delOncogenicEndometrioidPrimary uterusDeceased
16P0008444-T01V290Afs*66FS InsLikely oncogenicEndometrioidLung metDeceased
17P0008646-T01V293delIF delLikely oncogenicEndometrioidAbdominal metDeceased

Note: one tumor (P0008646-T01) had more than 1 CCND1 mutation, and one patient (P0005285) had two samples analyzed (primary and metastatic tumors). IF del = in frame deletion; FS Ins = frame shift insertion

* = truncating mutations.

Note: one tumor (P0008646-T01) had more than 1 CCND1 mutation, and one patient (P0005285) had two samples analyzed (primary and metastatic tumors). IF del = in frame deletion; FS Ins = frame shift insertion * = truncating mutations.

Functional effect of c-terminal CCND1 mutations in endometrial cancer

The majority of CCND1-mutated endometrial cancer cases (70%, 21 of 30 endometrial cancers, Tables 3 and 4) contained mutations in the c-terminus of cyclin D1 that may be implicated in cyclin D1 activation and gain-of-function (Tables 3 and 4). Recurrent activating mutations in endometrial cancer included: E275*, T286I (most common), P287S (second most common), D289del (Fig 1C and 1D and Tables 3 and 4). Less frequent mutations in endometrial cancer that are also likely oncogenic included: E279*, L283_294del, V290Afs*, R291dup, R291_V293del and V293del (Tables 3 and 4). Based on prior in vitro and in vivo studies, these mutations are predicted to drive cellular transformation and activation of CDK4/6 by disrupting cyclin D1 Thr-286 phosphorylation, nuclear export and proteasome-mediated degradation [12][10][11]. These findings suggest that a subset endometrial adenocarcinomas possesses a unique spectrum of somatic CCND1 mutations in which activating mutations occurring in the carboxy terminal domain of cyclin D1 are enriched, compared to other cancer types, thereby promoting cyclin D1 nuclear expression, gain of function and oncogenic activation.

Co-occurring mutations in endometrial cancer

TCGA cases exhibiting C-terminal CCND1 mutations had frequent co-occurring mutations of genes implicated in the pathogenesis of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas, as the majority of CCND1-mutated cases exhibited mutations of ARID1A and members of the PI3K signaling pathway, PTEN and PIK3CA. Less frequent co-occurring mutations were seen in other genes involved in endometrial carcinogenesis such as KRAS, CTNNB1, ARID5B and PMS2 in a minority of CCND1-mutated cases. In contrast, there were no co-occurring mutations of TP53, which is frequently mutated in endometrial serous and serous-like carcinomas, or of POLE, which is altered in ultramutated endometrial carcinomas, or of MSH2, MSH6 and MLH1, which are mutated in microsatellite unstable endometrial carcinomas (S2 Fig).

C-terminal CCND1 mutations in other cancer types

Although occurring less frequently than in endometrial cancer, c-terminal activating CCND1 mutations were also identified in other cancer types, such as gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma (esophageal, stomach, colorectal, ampula of vater), squamous cell carcinoma (head & neck, lung, skin), urothelial carcinoma, cutaneous melanoma, angiosarcoma, ovarian carcinoma (low grade serous and endometrioid types) and uterine epithelioid leiomyosarcoma (Table 5). The most common activating mutations occurred in amino acids P287 and T286 as missense mutations, or as nonsense mutations in amino acids Q261, E275, E279, E280, E285, all of which are predicted to directly disrupt the phospho-degron site and/or nuclear export signal of cyclin D1, thereby resulting in nuclear accumulation and protein overexpression. The rate of overall and c-terminal activating CCND1 mutations in these non-endometrial carcinoma types was rare, at most approximately 1% in melanoma and colorectal carcinoma. The overall rate of CCND1 mutations was 1.1% in colorectal carcinoma and cutaneous melanoma (23 of 2,067 cases and 8 of 708 cases respectively) with a smaller percentage of mutations occurring specifically in the c-terminal region of cyclin D1 (0.7%, 5 of 708 cases in cutaneous melanoma and 0.4%, 9 of 2067 in colorectal carcinoma).
Table 5

C-terminal CCND1 mutations across other non-endometrial carcinoma and non-mantle cell lymphoma cancer types.

StudySample IDCancer TypeMutationEffectType
Ampullary Carcinoma (Baylor, Cell Rep 2016)DUOAC_781Ampulla of VaterQ261*Likely oncogenicNonsense
MSK-IMPACT (MSKCC, Nat Med 2017)P-0000148-T01-IM3LG serous ovarian CAQ261*Likely oncogenicNonsense
MSK-IMPACT (MSKCC, Nat Med 2017)P-0003765-T01-IM5AngiosarcomaQ264*Likely oncogenicNonsense
Melanoma (Broad/Dana Farber, Nature 2012)ME049MelanomaA270TUnknownMissense
Pan-Lung Cancer (TCGA, Nat Genet 2016)TCGA-44-3396-01Lung AdenocarcinomaA271SUnknownMissense
Esophagus-Stomach Cancers (TCGA, Nat 2017)TCGA-BR-4363-01Stomach ACAA271TUnknownMissense
Pan-Lung Cancer (TCGA, Nat Genet 2016)TCGA-51-6867-01Lung SCCE275*Likely oncogenicNonsense
MSK-IMPACT (MSKCC, Nat Med 2017)P-0012241-T02-IM5Lung SCCE276VUnknownMissense
Colorectal ACA (DFCI, Cell Reports 2016)dfci_2016_3091Colorectal ACAE278GUnknownMissense
MSK-IMPACT (MSKCC, Nat Med 2017)P-0004495-T01-IM5Lung SCCE279*Likely oncogenicNonsense
Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma (TCGA, Nat 2014)TCGA-DK-A1A6-01Bladder urothelial CAE280delUnknownIF_Del
Esophagus-Stomach Cancers (TCGA, Nat 2017)TCGA-KH-A6WC-01Esophageal SCCE280delUnknownIF_Del
Melanoma tumors (UCLA, Cell 2016)Pt11Cutaneous melanomaE280*Likely oncogenicNonsense
Colorectal ACA (DFCI, Cell Reports 2016)dfci_2016_3064Colorectal ACAE280VUnknownMissense
H&N SCC (TCGA, Nature 2015)TCGA-CV-6441-01Head &Neck SCCD282HUnknownMissense
Colorectal ACA (DFCI, Cell Reports 2016)dfci_2016_111Colorectal ACAA284VUnknownMissense
Esophagus-Stomach Cancers (TCGA, Nat 2017)TCGA-L5-A8NM-01Esophageal ACAC285*Likely oncogenicNonsense
H&N SCC (TCGA, Nature 2015)TCGA-CV-6441-01Head & Neck SCCC285_P287delLikely oncogenicIF_Del
MSK-IMPACT (MSKCC, Nat Med 2017)P-0011446-T01-IM5Colorectal ACAT286AOncogenicMissense
Colorectal ACA (DFCI, Cell Reports 2016)dfci_2016_2624Colorectal ACAT286IOncogenicMissense
Colorectal ACA (DFCI, Cell Reports 2016)dfci_2016_3319Colorectal ACAT286IOncogenicMissense
MSK-IMPACT (MSKCC, Nat Med 2017)P-0005364-T01-IM5Up. tract urothelial CAT286IOncogenicMissense
Pan-Lung Cancer (TCGA, Nat Genet 2016)TCGA-85-8072-01Lung SCCP287AOncogenicMissense
Melanoma (Broad/Dana Farber, Nature 2012)ME024MelanomaP287LOncogenicMissense
MSK-IMPACT (MSKCC, Nat Med 2017)P-0000396-T01-IM3Oropharynx SCCP287LOncogenicMissense
Skin SCC (DFCI, Clin Cancer Res 2015)TP-S07-16280-NTCutaneous SCCP287LOncogenicMissense
Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (Broad, Nat 2012)OVK18_OVARYOvary endometrioid CAP287ROncogenicMissense
MSK-IMPACT (MSKCC, Nat Med 2017)P-0001821-T01-IM3Uterine epithelioid LMSP287SOncogenicMissense
MSK-IMPACT (MSKCC, Nat Med 2017)P-0005455-T01-IM5Colon ACAP287SOncogenicMissense
Colorectal ACA (DFCI, Cell Reports 2016)dfci_2016_2564Colorectal ACAR291WUnknownMissense
MSK-IMPACT (MSKCC, Nat Med 2017)P-0001685-T01-IM3Rectal ACAD292GUnknownMissense

Note: IF_del = in frame deletion

* = truncating mutations.

CA = carcinoma; ACA = adenocarcinoma; SCC = squamous cell carcinoma; LMS = leiomyosarcoma.

Note: IF_del = in frame deletion * = truncating mutations. CA = carcinoma; ACA = adenocarcinoma; SCC = squamous cell carcinoma; LMS = leiomyosarcoma.

Discussion

Cyclin D1, encoded by the CCND1 gene, is a core cell cycle protein that promotes cellular proliferation by activating CDK4/6 kinases and progression of the G1-S phase of cell cycle. CCND1 acts as oncogene and is frequently overexpressed in a variety of cancers often via gene amplification or gene rearrangement [23][24][25]. Recently, CCND1 mutations inhibiting Thr286 phosphorylation, nuclear export and ubiquitin-mediated degradation by the proteasome have been shown to result in constitutive activation of CDK4/6 complexes, thereby promoting cellular proliferation and malignant transformation both in vitro and in vivo [6][7][8]. Corroborating its oncogenic potential, CCND1 mutations affecting Thr286 phosphorylation and inhibiting nuclear export have been reported in a few cancers [10][12][11]; however, the frequency and spectrum of CCND1 mutations have not been systematically investigated or reported across a large series of cases and across a variety of cancer subtypes. We exploited and mined the publicly available data of the Cancer Genome Atlas Project and other published exome sequencing studies to interrogate the frequency, spectrum and oncogenic effects of CCND1 mutations across of a large number and diverse set of human cancers. Here, we demonstrate that CCND1 mutations are of very low frequency across the vast majority of cancer types (0.5%, 151 of 29,432 cases), but are predominantly enriched in endometrial endometrioid carcinomas in both the primary and metastatic settings (6.5%, 30 of 458 cases). In endometrial cancer, the majority of CCND1 mutations were located in the carboxy-terminal region of cyclin D1 (70%, 21 of 30 endometrial cancers), likely resulting in cyclin D1 oncogenic activation of cyclin D1-CDK4/6 complexes and gain of function. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically evaluate and report activating c-terminal CCND1 mutations across a large number of diverse cancer types. Our results are in line with two other previously published studies in which oncogenic, c-terminal cyclin D1 mutations were identified in endometrial cancer [10][11]. Ikeda et al identified CCND1 mutations in 2.3% (2 of 88) of endometrial cancer cases. Their two reported mutated cases contained a T286I mutation, which resulted in constitutive cyclin D1 nuclear accumulation and oncogenic activation [11]. Likewise, in an independent endometrial cancer cohort, Moreno-Bueno et al identified CCND1 mutations in 2.5% (3 of 119) endometrial cancer cases. Two cases demonstrated mutation at amino acid P287 (P287S and P287T), while a third case contained a 12-bp in-frame deletion that eliminated amino acids 289–292, all of which resulted in cyclin D1 nuclear expression in more than 50% of endometrial cancer cells [10]. Importantly, Benzeno et al independently confirmed that CCND1 mutations at T286, P287, D289 or deletion of amino acids 289–292 resulted in cyclin D1 nuclear retention, activation of CDK4/6 kinase and cellular transformation [12]. The rate of overall CCND1 mutations in endometrial cancer in our study is higher than that reported by Ikeda et al and Moreno-Bueno et al, likely reflecting the fact that the two prior studies sequenced a target region of cyclin D1 as opposed to next generation sequencing of the whole CCND1 gene. Our study expands the findings of Moreno-Bueno et al and Ikeda et al [10][11], in which CCND1 mutations at amino acids T286, P287, D289, deletion of amino acids 289–292 and potentially other c-terminal CCND1 mutations, such as nonsense mutation at E275*, E279*, may be important in the pathogenesis of a subset of endometrial cancers. Importantly, the majority of TCGA cases exhibiting c-terminal CCND1 mutations had frequent co-occurring mutations of ARID1A and members of the PI3K signaling pathway, PTEN and PIK3CA, suggesting that alterations these molecular pathways are also required in addition to oncogenic nuclear cyclin D1 activation in a subset of endometrial cancers. In addition, a search of the BROAD Institute gene variant database–derived from whole exomes of healthy individuals from many ethnic or geographic settings did not reveal any of the oncogenic c-terminal CCND1 mutations or polymorphisms indentified in our study in a control population that did not harbor cancer. Our results also corroborate the findings of Chang et al, who identified Proline 287 as a recurrent hotspot mutated amino acid of cyclin D1 in a population-scale cohort of tumor samples of various cancer types [26]. Consistent with the findings of Chang et al, Proline 287 was the most commonly mutated amino acid of cyclin D1 across all cancer types in our study. We identified mutations in cyclin D1 at Proline 287 in a diverse tumor set including melanoma, endometrial carcinoma, colonic adenocarcinoma, ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma, uterine leyomyosarcoma and squamous cell carcinoma of lung, oro-pharynx and skin, thus supporting the notion that CCND1 driver mutations at Pro287 may be a recurrent hotspot in cancer. In addition, we also demonstrate high frequency of oncogenic CCND1 mutations at or surrounding amino acid Threonine 286 in the c-terminus and at or surrounding Tyrosine 44 at the n-terminus, albeit in different tumor types (i.e. carcinoma, particularly endometrial, and mantle cell lymphoma respectively). Of note, in mantle cell lymphoma, it has also been previously demonstrated that, compared to wild type CCND1, n-terminal E36K, Y44D or C47S CCND1 mutations are likely oncogenic and increased cyclin D1 protein levels through attenuation of threonine-286 phosphorylation, thereby promoting resistance to ibrutinib, which is an FDA-approved Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor for mantle cell lymphoma treatment [27]. Future studies are needed in order to determine whether patients, whose tumors contain oncogenic activating mutations of CCND1, would benefit from precision medicine by targeting cyclin D1-CDK4/6 kinase complexes with specific inhibitors. In the past decade, the genomic landscape of many different types of tumors have been studied and deposited in publicly available data portals [28]. In addition, the clinical sequencing of advanced, metastatic tumors is becoming a mainstay in cancer care to guide potential treatment in mutation- and target-specific precision medicine [19]. In both clinical and preclinical research settings, a host of tools and resources can be used to interrogate specific genetic events relative to clinico-pathological characteristics of patient tumors as well as to generate hypotheses for future testing. Currently, the treatment options for advanced endometrial cancer patients are limited, and there is scant data with regards to the efficacy of palbociclib, a CDK4/6 specific inhibitor, towards endometrial cancer. In preclinical models, palbociclib or knockout of cyclin D1 had therapeutic potential against endometrial cancer cell lines and xenografts expressing the retinoblastoma protein, Rb [29][30]. Lastly, our findings implicate oncogenic c-terminal mutations of CCND1 in the pathogenesis of a subset of human cancers and provide a key resource to guide future preclinical and clinical investigations, especially with regards to the use of palbociclib or similar CDK4/6 specific inhibitors in a subset of endometrial cancers.

List of exome studies with respective cancer types and sites of origin that were mined for CCND1 mutations.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

CCND1 mutations in the mantle cell lymphoma IBIDIPS cohort.

IF del = in frame deletion; FS Ins = frame shift insertion; * = truncating mutations. (PDF) Click here for additional data file. Diagrams of CCND1 mutations in multiple myeloma (A), in colorectal adenocarcinoma (B) and in cutaneous melanoma (C). (PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Diagram of co-occurring mutations of genes frequently implicated in endometrial cancer in the TCGA cohort of endometrial carcinoma cases exhibiting CCND1 mutations.

Square denotes presence of gene mutation. Red bar denotes presence of c-terminal CCND1 mutation. (PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  30 in total

Review 1.  Cyclin D as a therapeutic target in cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Musgrove; C Elizabeth Caldon; Jane Barraclough; Andrew Stone; Robert L Sutherland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  A census of amplified and overexpressed human cancer genes.

Authors:  Thomas Santarius; Janet Shipley; Daniel Brewer; Michael R Stratton; Colin S Cooper
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Expression of constitutively nuclear cyclin D1 in murine lymphocytes induces B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  A B Gladden; R Woolery; P Aggarwal; M A Wasik; J A Diehl
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination of cyclin D1 by the SCF(FBX4-alphaB crystallin) complex.

Authors:  Douglas I Lin; Olena Barbash; K G Suresh Kumar; Jason D Weber; J Wade Harper; Andres J P Klein-Szanto; Anil Rustgi; Serge Y Fuchs; J Alan Diehl
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 5.  Cyclin D1, cancer progression, and opportunities in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Shuo Qie; J Alan Diehl
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 6.  Cyclin D1, EMS1 and 11q13 amplification in breast cancer.

Authors:  Christopher J Ormandy; Elizabeth A Musgrove; Rina Hui; Roger J Daly; Robert L Sutherland
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base.

Authors:  Debyani Chakravarty; Jianjiong Gao; Sarah M Phillips; Ritika Kundra; Hongxin Zhang; Jiaojiao Wang; Julia E Rudolph; Rona Yaeger; Tara Soumerai; Moriah H Nissan; Matthew T Chang; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Tiffany A Traina; Paul K Paik; Alan L Ho; Feras M Hantash; Andrew Grupe; Shrujal S Baxi; Margaret K Callahan; Alexandra Snyder; Ping Chi; Daniel Danila; Mrinal Gounder; James J Harding; Matthew D Hellmann; Gopa Iyer; Yelena Janjigian; Thomas Kaley; Douglas A Levine; Maeve Lowery; Antonio Omuro; Michael A Postow; Dana Rathkopf; Alexander N Shoushtari; Neerav Shukla; Martin Voss; Ederlinda Paraiso; Ahmet Zehir; Michael F Berger; Barry S Taylor; Leonard B Saltz; Gregory J Riely; Marc Ladanyi; David M Hyman; José Baselga; Paul Sabbatini; David B Solit; Nikolaus Schultz
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2017-05-16

Review 8.  Mantle cell lymphoma: 2013 Update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and clinical management.

Authors:  Julie M Vose
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 10.047

9.  The efficacy of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Tomohito Tanaka; Yoshito Terai; Keisuke Ashihara; Satoe Fujiwara; Yoshimichi Tanaka; Hiroshi Sasaki; Satoshi Tsunetoh; Masahide Ohmichi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Identifying recurrent mutations in cancer reveals widespread lineage diversity and mutational specificity.

Authors:  Matthew T Chang; Saurabh Asthana; Sizhi Paul Gao; Byron H Lee; Jocelyn S Chapman; Cyriac Kandoth; JianJiong Gao; Nicholas D Socci; David B Solit; Adam B Olshen; Nikolaus Schultz; Barry S Taylor
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  7 in total

1.  ISG20 serves as a potential biomarker and drives tumor progression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tianbo Xu; Hailong Ruan; Su Gao; Jingchong Liu; Yuenan Liu; Zhengshuai Song; Qi Cao; Keshan Wang; Lin Bao; Di Liu; Junwei Tong; Jian Shi; Huageng Liang; Hongmei Yang; Ke Chen; Xiaoping Zhang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 2.  MiR-326: Promising Biomarker for Cancer.

Authors:  Yao-Jie Pan; Jian Wan; Chun-Bin Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Single-cell analysis of gastric pre-cancerous and cancer lesions reveals cell lineage diversity and intratumoral heterogeneity.

Authors:  Jihyun Kim; Charny Park; Kwang H Kim; Eun Hye Kim; Hyunki Kim; Jong Kyu Woo; Je Kyung Seong; Ki Taek Nam; Yong Chan Lee; Soo Young Cho
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2022-01-27

4.  Maternal Low-Protein Diet Deregulates DNA Repair and DNA Replication Pathways in Female Offspring Mammary Gland Leading to Increased Chemically Induced Rat Carcinogenesis in Adulthood.

Authors:  Joyce R Zapaterini; Antonio R B Fonseca; Lucas T Bidinotto; Ketlin T Colombelli; André L D Rossi; Laura Kass; Luis A Justulin; Luis F Barbisan
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-01

5.  Uncovering Hidden Mechanisms of Different Prescriptions Treatment for Osteoporosis via Novel Bioinformatics Model and Experiment Validation.

Authors:  Yujie Liu; Qinwen Liu; Chuanhui Yin; Yi Li; Jie Wu; Quanlin Chen; Hailang Yu; Aiping Lu; Daogang Guan
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-08

6.  NT157 exerts antineoplastic activity by targeting JNK and AXL signaling in lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Lívia Bassani Lins de Miranda; Keli Lima; Juan Luiz Coelho-Silva; Fabiola Traina; Susumu S Kobayashi; João Agostinho Machado-Neto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Spatial transcriptomics analysis of uterine gene expression in enhancer of zeste homolog 2 conditional knockout mice†.

Authors:  Ana M Mesa; Jiude Mao; Theresa I Medrano; Nathan J Bivens; Alexander Jurkevich; Geetu Tuteja; Paul S Cooke; Cheryl S Rosenfeld
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.161

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.