| Literature DB >> 29969481 |
Ling Shen1,2, Sawitri Assanangkornchai1, Wei Liu2, Le Cai2, Fei Li3, Songyuan Tang2, Jiucheng Shen4, Edward B McNeil1, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong1.
Abstract
AIMS: To examine drug use behavior of clients attending Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) programs and its relationship with the clients' social network characteristics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29969481 PMCID: PMC6029801 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Distribution of sociodemographic variables of subjects by clinic; N (%).
| Clinic 1 | Clinic 2 | Clinic 3 | Clinic 4 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 324 (100.0) | ||||
| Age | |||||
| Mean (SD) | 46.2 (5.9) | 44.3 (6.2) | 44.7 (5.7) | 45.5 (7.2) | 45.2 (6.3) |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 60 (74.1) | 58 (71.6) | 57 (70.4) | 74 (91.4) | 249 (76.9) |
| Female | 21 (25.9) | 23 (28.4) | 24 (29.6) | 7 (8.6) | 75 (23.1) |
| Religion | |||||
| Buddhist | 11 (13.6) | 19 (23.5) | 16 (19.8) | 19 (23.5) | 65 (20.1) |
| Christian or Muslim | 12 (14.8) | 12 (14.8) | 10 (12.3) | 10 (12.3) | 44 (13.5) |
| None | 58 (71.6) | 50 (61.7) | 55 (67.9) | 52 (64.2) | 215 (66.4) |
| Education | |||||
| No formal education | 5 (6.2) | 3 (3.7) | 9 (11.1) | 17 (21.0) | 34 (10.5) |
| Primary school only | 10 (12.3) | 25 (30.9) | 23 (28.4) | 32 (39.5) | 90 (27.8) |
| High school and above | 66 (81.5) | 53 (65.4) | 49 (60.5) | 32 (39.5) | 200 (61.7) |
| Marital status | |||||
| Single | 13 (16.0) | 5 (6.2) | 6 (7.4) | 17 (21.0) | 41 (12.7) |
| Married | 47 (58.0) | 55 (67.9) | 61 (75.3) | 47 (58.0) | 210 (64.8) |
| Other | 21 (26.0) | 21 (25.9) | 14 (17.3) | 17 (21.0) | 73 (22.5) |
| Ethnic group | |||||
| Han | 71 (87.7) | 67 (82.7) | 68 (84.0) | 63 (77.8) | 269 (83.0) |
| Other | 10 (12.3) | 14 (17.3) | 13 (16.0) | 18 (22.2) | 55 (17.0) |
| Employment status | |||||
| Unemployed | 29 (35.8) | 37 (45.7) | 39 (48.1) | 13 (16.0) | 118 (36.4) |
| Part-time | 14 (17.3) | 10 (12.3) | 10 (12.3) | 14 (17.3) | 48 (14.8) |
| Full-time | 32 (39.5) | 26 (32.1) | 25 (30.9) | 49 (60.5) | 132 (40.7) |
| Self-employed | 4 (4.9) | 7 (8.6) | 5 (6.2) | 3 (3.7) | 19 (5.9) |
| Other | 2 (2.5) | 1 (1.2) | 2 (2.5) | 2 (2.5) | 7 (2.2) |
Separated/divorced/widowed
Characteristics of social network of MMT clients (N = 324).
| Network characteristic | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Size (mean ± SD) | 3.9 ± 1.0 |
| Older (median age of members > client’s age) | 134 (41.4) |
| Different sex (>50% of members of opposite sex) | 105 (32.4) |
| Has parents in the network | 175 (54.0) |
| Has friends in the network | 108 (33.3) |
| Has a spouse in the network | 106 (32.7) |
| Has children in the network | 92 (28.4) |
| Has relatives in the network | 65 (20.1) |
| Has colleague in the network | 32 (9.9) |
| Has at least one MMT friend in the network | 15 (4.6) |
| At least one very close member in the network | 298 (92.0) |
| At least one very influential member in the network | 217 (67.0) |
| At least one member of the network joining drug use | 79 (24.4) |
| Financial | 275 (84.9) |
| Emotional | 284 (87.7) |
| Health advice | 146 (45.1) |
SD = standard deviation.
*At least one member of the network.
Regression results of social network factors associated with result of urine test among MMT clinics in Kunming in Yunnan Provence, China (logistic regression predicting urine test: Positive vs. negative).
| Characteristic of the network | Crude OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Highly influential: yes vs. no | 5.75 (2.75,12.03) | 6.47 (2.86,14.65) |
| Joining in drug use: yes vs. no | 2.73 (1.59,4.7) | 1.94 (1.04,3.63) |
| Age: older vs. same age or younger | 1.03 (1.00,1.05) | 1.03 (1.00,1.06) |
| Could provide emotional support: yes vs. no | 0.26 (0.13,0.51) | 0.11 (0.03,0.35) |
| Spouse and/or child in network: yes vs. no | 0.51 (0.3,0.85) | 0.44 (0.24,0.81) |
| Close relationship: yes vs. no | 0.64 (0.27,1.49) | 0.28 (0.09,0.9) |
| Financial support: yes vs. no | 0.49 (0.26,0.93) | 1.81 (0.63,5.22) |
| Size of network (continuous variable) | 0.99 (0.82,1.18) | 1.17 (0.89,1.53) |
| Health advice: yes vs. no | 0.73 (0.44,1.21) | 0.85 (0.47,1.56) |
Adjusted for demographic characteristics: age, gender, education, current employment, number of children, and cohabiting with network members.
P-value < 0.05