Literature DB >> 29967955

Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT for the assessment of tumour response in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a pilot study.

Eyjolfur Gudmundsson1, Zacariah Labby2,3, Christopher M Straus2, William F Sensakovic2,4, Feng Li2, Buerkley Rose5, Alexandra Cunliffe2,6, Hedy L Kindler5, Samuel G Armato2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the utility of haemodynamic parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT) scans in the assessment of tumour response to treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients.
METHODS: The patient cohort included nine patients undergoing chemotherapy and five patients on observation. Each patient underwent two DCE-CT scans separated by approximately 2 months. The DCE-CT parameters of tissue blood flow (BF) and tissue blood volume (BV) were obtained within the dynamically imaged tumour. Mean relative changes in tumour DCE-CT parameters between scans were compared between the on-treatment and on-observation cohorts. DCE-CT parameter changes were correlated with relative change in tumour bulk evaluated according to the modified RECIST protocol.
RESULTS: Differing trends in relative change in BF and BV between scans were found between the two patient groups (p = 0.19 and p = 0.06 for BF and BV, respectively). No significant rank correlations were found when comparing relative changes in DCE-CT parameters with relative change in tumour bulk.
CONCLUSIONS: Differing trends in the relative change of BF and BV between patients on treatment and on observation indicate the potential of DCE-CT for the assessment of pharmacodynamic endpoints with respect to treatment in MPM. A future study with a larger patient cohort and unified treatment regimens should be undertaken to confirm the results of this pilot study. KEY POINTS: • CT-derived haemodynamic parameters show differing trends between malignant pleural mesothelioma patients on treatment and patients off treatment • Changes in haemodynamic parameters do not correlate with changes in tumour bulk as measured according to the modified RECIST protocol • Differing trends across the two patient groups indicate the potential sensitivity of DCE-CT to assess pharmacodynamic endpoints in the treatment of MPM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haemodynamics; Mesothelioma; Multidetector computed tomography; Perfusion imaging; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29967955     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5533-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  26 in total

Review 1.  Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement?

Authors:  K A Miles; M R Griffiths
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.

Authors:  Jodie A Christner; James M Kofler; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Mohammad R Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Optimizing the size variation threshold for the CT evaluation of response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib.

Authors:  R Thiam; L S Fournier; L Trinquart; J Medioni; G Chatellier; D Balvay; B Escudier; C Dromain; C A Cuenod; S Oudard
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  The use of perfusion CT for the evaluation of therapy combining AZD2171 with gefitinib in cancer patients.

Authors:  Martijn R Meijerink; Hester van Cruijsen; Klaas Hoekman; Matthijs Kater; Cors van Schaik; Jan Hein T M van Waesberghe; Giuseppe Giaccone; Radu A Manoliu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Nicholas J Vogelzang; James J Rusthoven; James Symanowski; Claude Denham; E Kaukel; Pierre Ruffie; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Michael Boyer; Salih Emri; Christian Manegold; Clet Niyikiza; Paolo Paoletti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Modeling of mesothelioma growth demonstrates weaknesses of current response criteria.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Oxnard; Samuel G Armato; Hedy L Kindler
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.705

9.  Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria.

Authors:  Jedd D Wolchok; Axel Hoos; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey S Weber; Omid Hamid; Celeste Lebbé; Michele Maio; Michael Binder; Oliver Bohnsack; Geoffrey Nichol; Rachel Humphrey; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Modified RECIST criteria for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  M J Byrne; A K Nowak
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical Implementation of a Free-Breathing, Motion-Robust Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Protocol to Evaluate Pleural Tumors.

Authors:  Thomas S C Ng; Ravi T Seethamraju; Raphael Bueno; Ritu R Gill
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  A case of localized peritoneal malignant mesothelioma with ovarian metastasis and literature review.

Authors:  Jingwen Wang; Rong Hu; Qian He
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 2.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.