| Literature DB >> 29967646 |
Joilane Alves Pereira-Freire1,2, George Laylson da Silva Oliveira3, Layana Karine Farias Lima2, Carla Lorena Silva Ramos2, Stella Regina Arcanjo-Medeiros1, Ana Cristina Silva de Lima4, Sabrina Almondes Teixeira5, Guilherme Antônio Lopes de Oliveira2, Nárcia Mariana Fonseca Nunes2,6, Vivianne Rodrigues Amorim2,6, Luciano da Silva Lopes2,6, Larissa Araújo Rolim7, Joaquim Soares da Costa-Júnior8, Paulo Michel Pinheiro Ferreira2,6.
Abstract
Mauritia flexuosa (Arecaceae), known as "Buriti," is a Brazilian palm tree with high economic potential for local communities. Herein, we investigated the phytochemistry profile and antioxidant potential of M. flexuosa fruits and determined the bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds. Peels revealed upper values for phenols, flavonoids, carotenoids, tannins, and ascorbic acid when compared to the pulps and endocarps. All samples showed capacity to scavenger free radicals (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 mg/mL) but peels presented higher scavenger action in all methods explored. Phenolic compounds identified by HPLC displayed reduced bioaccessibility after in vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion for pulp (38.7%), peel (18.7%), and endocarp (22.3%) extracts (P < 0.05). Buriti fruits also protected rat blood cells against lysis induced by peroxyl radicals. We demonstrated the promising chemopreventive potentialities of M. flexuosa fruits and their by-products and peels with higher quantities of bioactive compounds and phenolic substances before and after in vitro bioaccessibility investigation. In Brazil, these parts are discarded or underused, mainly as feed for ruminant animals. Consequently, it is extremely important to explore nutritional characteristics of these by-products for human/livestock foods and to install biofriendly techniques and sustainable biotechnology handling of natural resources.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29967646 PMCID: PMC6008795 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2051279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Preparation of Mauritia flexuosa fruits: lyophilization, pulverization, and stocking preceded phytochemical and biological analysis.
Quantification of phenols, flavonoids, carotenoids, condensed tannins, and hydrolysable tannins in the lyophilized methanolic extracts of pulp, peel, and endocarp from Mauritia flexuosa fruits.
| Class of compounds | Pulp | Peel | Endocarp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total phenols | 553.5 ± 7.7b | 1288.0 ± 10.4a,c | 597.1 ± 6.5b |
| Total flavonoids | 264.4 ± 2.1b,c | 339.4 ± 3.9a,c | 145.4 ± 10.2a,b |
| Total carotenoids | 58.9 ± 0.1b,c | 88.3 ± 0.3a,c | 19.1 ± 0.2a,b |
| Hydrolysable tannins | 47.4 ± 0.3b,c | 56.2 ± 0.4a,c | 0.1 ± 0.02a,b |
| Condensed tannins | 69.6 ± 1.8b,c | 118.3 ± 2.1a,c | 36.5 ± 1.4a,b |
| Ascorbic acid | 4.3 ± 1.3c | 5.9 ± 0.2c | 2.5 ± 0.3a,b |
Data were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). aP < 0.05 compared to pulp; bP < 0.05 compared to peel; cP < 0.05 compared to endocarp by ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test.
Identification of compounds by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in Mauritia flexuosa samples.
| IUPAC Name | Chemical structures | Class | Retention time (min) | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid |
| Phenol | 16.3 | Pulp |
|
| ||||
| 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxychromen-4-one |
| Flavonoid | 33.6 | Pulp |
|
| ||||
| 4′,5,7-Trihydroxyflavone |
| Flavonoid | 41.7 | Pulp |
|
| ||||
| (−)- |
| Condensed tannin | 53.6 | Endocarp |
|
| ||||
| (−)- |
| Condensed tannin | 48.3 | Peel |
Contents of phenolic compounds in the lyophilized methanolic extracts of pulp, peel, and endocarp from Mauritia flexuosa fruits before and after simulated gastrointestinal digestion.
| Sample | Bioaccessibility before | Bioaccessibility after | Reduction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulp | 553.5 ± 7.7 | 102.2 ± 0.4 | 18.7 |
| Peel | 1288.0 ± 10.4 | 498.5 ± 13.9 | 38.7 |
| Endocarp | 597.1 ± 6.5 | 133.4 ± 7.8 | 22.3 |
P < 0.05 compared to bioaccessibility before in vitro digestionby ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test.
Figure 2Effects of lyophilized fruits (pulp, peel, and endocarp) from Mauritia flexuosa (0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 mg/mL) on the removal of (a) 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), (b) 2,20-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), (c) reducing potential (Fe3+/Fe2), (d) reactive substances to thiobarbituric acid [TBARS levels induced by 2,2′-azo-bis (2-methylpropionamidine]) dihydrochloride, AAPH), and (e) nitrite content (induced by sodium nitroprusside). Trolox (0.5 mg/mL) was used as positive standard. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of measurement (SEM) from two independent experiments in triplicate. Negative control was treated with the solution used for diluting the tested substance. With exception of reducing potential, absorbance values were converted to inhibition (I) percentage of radicals: I (%) = [(absorbance of negative control − absorbance of sample) × 100]/absorbance of negative control. P < 0.05 compared to negative control by ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test.
Figure 3Protection against oxidative hemolysis induced by peroxyl radicals generated following thermal decomposition of 2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH) by lyophilized fruits (pulp, peel, and endocarp) from Mauritia flexuosa (0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 mg/mL). Trolox (0.5 mg/mL) was used as positive standard. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of measurement (SEM) from two independent experiments in triplicate. Negative control was treated with the solution used for diluting the tested substance. P < 0.05 compared to control by ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test.
Analysis of Pearson's correlation among bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity in samples of pulp, peel, and endocarp from Mauritia flexuosa.
| Class of compounds | DPPH | ABTS | Reducing potential | TBARS | Nitrite content | Oxidative hemolysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulp | ||||||
| Total phenols | 0.956 | 0.978 | 0.978 | 0.867 | 0.931 | 0.954 |
| Total flavonoids | 0.957 | 0.979 | 0.978 | 0.869 | 0.933 | 0.956 |
| Total carotenoids | 0.951 | 0.974 | 0.975 | 0.859 | 0.926 | 0.951 |
| Condensed tannins | 0.955 | 0.977 | 0.978 | 0.866 | 0.930 | 0.954 |
| Hydrolysable tannins | 0.923 | 0.953 | 0.956 | 0.822 | 0.898 | 0.935 |
|
| ||||||
| Peel | ||||||
| Total phenols | 0.681 | 0.847 | 0.928 | 0.749 | 0.854 | 0.907 |
| Total flavonoids | 0.956 | 0.978 | 0.978 | 0.867 | 0.931 | 0.954 |
| Total carotenoids | 0.966 | 0.984 | 0.983 | 0.881 | 0.941 | 0.959 |
| Condensed tannins | 0.963 | 0.982 | 0.982 | 0.876 | 0.937 | 0.957 |
| Hydrolysable tannins | 0.972 | 0.988 | 0.987 | 0.890 | 0.947 | 0.961 |
|
| ||||||
| Endocarp | ||||||
| Total phenols | 0.682 | 0.848 | 0.930 | 0.751 | 0.854 | 0.907 |
| Total flavonoids | 0.951 | 0.974 | 0.975 | 0.860 | 0.926 | 0.952 |
| Total carotenoids | 0.949 | 0.973 | 0.974 | 0.857 | 0.924 | 0.950 |
| Condensed tannins | 0.952 | 0.975 | 0.976 | 0.861 | 0.927 | 0.952 |
| Hydrolysable tannins | 0.948 | 0.972 | 0.973 | 0.855 | 0.923 | 0.950 |
P < 0.05. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated using Student's t-test for all variables at 5% significance levels. 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS), reducing potential (Fe3+/Fe2), reactive substances to thiobarbituric acid [TBARS levels induced by 2,2′-azo-bis (2-methylpropionamidine]) dihydrochloride, AAPH), and nitrite content (induced by sodium nitroprusside).