Literature DB >> 28803526

Familiarity and Within-Person Facial Variability: The Importance of the Internal and External Features.

Robin S S Kramer1, Zoi Manesi2, Alice Towler3, Michael G Reynolds4, A Mike Burton3.   

Abstract

As faces become familiar, we come to rely more on their internal features for recognition and matching tasks. Here, we assess whether this same pattern is also observed for a card sorting task. Participants sorted photos showing either the full face, only the internal features, or only the external features into multiple piles, one pile per identity. In Experiments 1 and 2, we showed the standard advantage for familiar faces-sorting was more accurate and showed very few errors in comparison with unfamiliar faces. However, for both familiar and unfamiliar faces, sorting was less accurate for external features and equivalent for internal and full faces. In Experiment 3, we asked whether external features can ever be used to make an accurate sort. Using familiar faces and instructions on the number of identities present, we nevertheless found worse performance for the external in comparison with the internal features, suggesting that less identity information was available in the former. Taken together, we show that full faces and internal features are similarly informative with regard to identity. In comparison, external features contain less identity information and produce worse card sorting performance. This research extends current thinking on the shift in focus, both in attention and importance, toward the internal features and away from the external features as familiarity with a face increases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  card sorting; external features; familiarity; internal features; unfamiliar faces; within-person variability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28803526     DOI: 10.1177/0301006617725242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  7 in total

1.  Discrimination and recognition of faces with changed configuration.

Authors:  Adam Sandford; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

2.  Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.

Authors:  Elliot Collins; Amanda K Robinson; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer; Jerrica Mulgrew; Michael G Reynolds
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Optimal features for auditory categorization.

Authors:  Shi Tong Liu; Pilar Montes-Lourido; Xiaoqin Wang; Srivatsun Sadagopan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  The importance of internal and external features in recognizing faces that vary in familiarity and race.

Authors:  Menahal Latif; Margaret C Moulson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 1.695

6.  The Own-Race Bias for Face Recognition in a Multiracial Society.

Authors:  Hoo Keat Wong; Ian D Stephen; David R T Keeble
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-06

7.  Forgetting faces over a week: investigating self-reported face recognition ability and personality.

Authors:  Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.