Divya Pathak1, Neelay Mehendale2, Shubham Singh2, Roop Mallik1, Siddhesh S Kamat2. 1. Department of Biological Sciences , Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) , Homi Bhabha Road , Mumbai 400005 , India. 2. Department of Biology , Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) , Dr. Homi Bhabha Road , Pashan, Pune 411008 , India.
Abstract
Phagocytosis is an evolutionarily conserved biological process where pathogens or cellular debris are cleared by engulfing them in a membrane-enclosed cellular compartment called the phagosome. The formation, maturation, and subsequent degradation of a phagosome is an important immune response essential for protection against many pathogens. Yet, the global lipid profile of phagosomes remains unknown, especially as a function of their maturation in immune cells. Here, we show using mass spectrometry based quantitative lipidomics that the ceramide class of lipids, especially very long chain ceramides, are enriched on maturing phagosomes with a concomitant decrease in the biosynthetic precursors of ceramides. We thus posit a new function for the enzyme ceramide synthase during phagocytosis in mammalian macrophages. Biochemical assays, cellular lipid feeding experiments, and pharmacological blockade of ceramide synthase together show that this enzyme indeed controls the flux of ceramides on maturing phagosomes. We also find similar results in the primitive eukaryote Dictyostelium discoideum, suggesting that ceramide enrichment may be evolutionarily conserved and likely an indispensible step in phagosome maturation.
Phagocytosis is an evolutionarily conserved biological process where pathogens or cellular debris are cleared by engulfing them in a membrane-enclosed cellular compartment called the phagosome. The formation, maturation, and subsequent degradation of a phagosome is an important immune response essential for protection against many pathogens. Yet, the global lipid profile of phagosomes remains unknown, especially as a function of their maturation in immune cells. Here, we show using mass spectrometry based quantitative lipidomics that the ceramide class of lipids, especially very long chain ceramides, are enriched on maturing phagosomes with a concomitant decrease in the biosynthetic precursors of ceramides. We thus posit a new function for the enzyme ceramide synthase during phagocytosis in mammalian macrophages. Biochemical assays, cellular lipid feeding experiments, and pharmacological blockade of ceramide synthase together show that this enzyme indeed controls the flux of ceramides on maturing phagosomes. We also find similar results in the primitive eukaryote Dictyostelium discoideum, suggesting that ceramide enrichment may be evolutionarily conserved and likely an indispensible step in phagosome maturation.
In 1884,
the phagocyte, a type of immune cell, was discovered and found to
engulf, digest, and clear bacterial particles.[1] Phagocytosis is the process of internalization of solid particles
(pathogens or cellular debris) ≥ 500 nm by immune cells, predominantly
macrophages. Over the past century, this universally conserved process
has been extensively studied and shown to be a critical component
of both the innate and adaptive mammalian immune system.[2] Once internalized, these particles acquire membranes
from the cellular plasma membrane and undergo a choreographed sequence
of events broadly referred to as “phagosomal maturation,”
culminating in fusion of the phagosomes with lysosomes. During maturation,
the phagosomal lumen decreases in pH from 7 to 4.5 from an early phagosome
(EP) to finally fuse with lysosome (phago-lysosome) via a late phagosome
(LP) intermediate on the maturation pathway.[3−5] During this
transformation, the maturing phagosome changes profoundly in its protein
and lipid composition via interactions and functional crosstalk with
the endocytic pathway and inputs from the trans-golgi-network.Over the past two decades, several elegant proteomics studies have
shown the role of specific proteins in the maturation process, and
these in turn have served as unique markers for the different stages
in the phagosomal maturation process.[2] For
example, the GTPase Rab5 and early endosome antigen 1 (EEA1) localize
to the EP and drive the EP to mature into a LP. The GTPase Rab7 and lysosomal associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1) are
found enriched on LPs and are critical for the formation of the phago-lysosome.
Further studies in characterizing these proteins have shown that the
process of phagosomal maturation is spatiotemporally regulated and
highly interdependent.[2] For instance, the
acquisition of Rab5 onto the EP is a prerequisite for recruiting Rab7
in order to proceed with the maturation process. The localization
of EPs is mostly peripheral, while that of LPs is toward the perinuclear
region of the cell, where the lysosomes reside.[6] Though the initial engulfment of a foreign particle mostly
involves remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton, phagosome maturation
requires transport of the phagosome on the microtubule cytoskeleton.
While there exist several global proteomics studies that describe
the role of different proteins during phagosomal maturation, there
are only a handful of studies reported that describe the lipid profiles
of maturing phagosomes, and these, too, only describe a specific lipid
class, and not the global lipid profile.[7] One
such study describes the role and enrichment of different phosphoinositides
at different stages of phagosomal maturation.[8]We find that cholesterol is enriched on LPs,
where it forms membrane lipid raft domains, and deregulated cholesterol
metabolism impairs phagosomal maturation.[9−11] Recently, we
have shown that the motor protein dynein is enriched and clustered
on these cholesterol rich lipid microdomains on LPs, and this in turn
efficiently facilitates the unidirectional motion of LPs toward the
lysosome.[9,12] As a corollary to the aforementioned work,
here, we set out to quantitatively determine the lipid composition
of EPs and LPs. We show by biochemical assays, fatty acid feeding,
and cellular pharmacological studies that the enzyme ceramide synthase
controls the flux of ceramides during phagosomal maturation and leads
to a very pronounced increase of very long-chain ceramides on LPs. This
increase, we believe, is universally conserved because it is replicated
in both mammalian cells (RAW264.7 macrophages) and in an early eukaryote
(Dictyostelium discoideum). Finally, pharmacological
blockade of ceramide synthase hampers the process of phagosomal maturation,
suggesting an important role for this enzyme in the orchestration
of phagocytosis.
Results and Discussion
Lipidomic Characterization
of Maturing Phagosomes
To comparatively analyze the lipid
profiles, herein referred to as the lipidome of EP and LP, we first
extracted lipids from EPs and LPs and established a LC-MS/MS based
method to exhaustively analyze >400 unique lipid species from 22
lipid classes in tandem (Figure A, Supporting Information Table 1).[13−17] These lipid classes broadly encompassed neutral lipids, phospholipids
and their lyso-versions, sterols and their esters, and sphingolipids.[13−19] EPs and LPs were prepared and purified using established protocols
from the mammalian RAW264.7 macrophages, and their purity was assessed
to ensure these EP and LP preparations were devoid of any cellular
membrane contamination (e.g., ER membrane, Golgi membrane), by previously
established Western blot analysis.[6,9] As reported
earlier, quantitative lipidomics recapitulated a >3-fold increase
in cholesterol on LPs compared to EPs, giving further confidence in
our phagosomal preparations (Figure B, Supporting Information Table 1).[9,10] Interestingly, we found that ceramides were
highly enriched on LPs, and this enrichment was the most profound
for very long chain (VLC) fatty acid chain (≥C22) containing
ceramide species (Figure C, Supporting Information Table 1). Additionally, there was a concomitant decrease in the level of
sphingosine (Figure D, Supporting Information Table 1) and
VLC fatty acid bearing phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine
(PE) phospholipids (Figure E, Supporting Information Table 1). Surprisingly, we also find that two free polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), namely, arachidonic acid (C20:4) and docasahexenoic
acid (C22:6), are enriched on LPs, and there is a concomitant decrease
in the concentrations of PUFA containing PC and PE lipids on LPs (Supporting Information Table 1). Besides these
lipids, no other major lipid class was found to change significantly
between the EP and LP groups (Supporting Information Table 1). As a control, to assess whether the changes in ceramides
were EP and LP specific, and not a cellular event during phagosomal
maturation, we measured ceramide levels in RAW264.7 macrophages at
0.5 and 4 h post feeding of beads and compared these concentrations
to “no bead” treated RAW264.7 macrophages. We found
no change in the concentration of cellular ceramides in this experiment,
suggesting that ceramide changes from our last experiment were indeed
EP and LP specific (Supporting Information Figure 1).
Figure 1
Lipidomic characterization of EPs and LPs derived from RAW264.7
mouse macrophages. (A) Heat map plot showing the different lipid classes
assessed by comparative LC-MS/MS analysis for EPs and LPs from RAW264.7
mouse macrophages. The heat map plot represents an average of fold
changes (LP/EP) on a log 2 scale for different lipids from a particular
lipid class. Blue and red color changes show enrichment of a particular
lipid class on EP and LP respectively. Data represent six biological
replicates per group. See Supporting Information Table 1 for complete data sets. Concentration of (B) cholesterol,
(C) ceramides, (D) sphingosine, and (E) very long chain (VLC) containing
phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) phospholipids
from EPs and LPs. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 for LP group versus EP group by Student's t test.
Lipidomic characterization of EPs and LPs derived from RAW264.7
mouse macrophages. (A) Heat map plot showing the different lipid classes
assessed by comparative LC-MS/MS analysis for EPs and LPs from RAW264.7
mouse macrophages. The heat map plot represents an average of fold
changes (LP/EP) on a log 2 scale for different lipids from a particular
lipid class. Blue and red color changes show enrichment of a particular
lipid class on EP and LP respectively. Data represent six biological
replicates per group. See Supporting Information Table 1 for complete data sets. Concentration of (B) cholesterol,
(C) ceramides, (D) sphingosine, and (E) very long chain (VLC) containing
phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) phospholipids
from EPs and LPs. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 for LP group versus EP group by Student's t test.Since phagocytosis is
an evolutionarily conserved immune process, we decided to perform
a similar quantitative lipidomics experiment using a primitive eukaryote
as a model system. Dictyostelium discoideum was chosen
for this, because we earlier reconstituted the microtubule motor dependent
motion of EPs and LPs purified from this soil-living amoeba and found
that the clustering of dynein into lipid raft domains transports LPs
toward fusion with lysosomes.[9] The phytosterols
(stigmasterol and sitosterol, as Dictyostelium discoideum does not have any cholesterol) and VLC fatty acid containing ceramides
were found most enriched on LPs, while the sphingolipid precursors
(sphingosine and sphinganine) and VLC fatty acid containing PCs were
found enriched on EPs (Supporting Information Figure 2, Supporting Information Table 1). Given the striking increase in VLC fatty acid containing
ceramides and a concomitant decrease in sphingosine and VLC containing
phospholipids (PC, PE) on LPs in both RAW264.7 macrophages and Dictyostelium discoideum cells, we hypothesized that an
enzyme capable of biosynthesizing ceramides from sphingosine and phospholipid-derived
fatty acid precursors was likely causing ceramide accumulation on
the phagosome membrane during their maturation. On the basis of the
lipidomics data, we also postulated that this enzyme has a preference
for biosynthesizing VLC fatty acid containing ceramides.
Role of Ceramide
Synthase in Phagocytosis
Mammals have an integral membrane
enzyme, ceramide synthase (CerS), that biosynthesizes ceramides from
sphingosine and fatty acyl-coenzyme A (CoA) (Figure A). There are six isoforms of ceramide synthase
(CerS1–6) in mammals, with different tissue distributions and
fatty acyl-CoA substrate preferences.[20] Both large-scale gene expression studies (http://biogps.org/;[21]Supporting Information Figure 3) and literature precedence support CerS2 being the major ceramide
synthase in RAW264.7 macrophages,[22] but
its detection at a protein level and enzymatic activity in RAW264.7
macrophages remains lacking. Interestingly, biochemical characterization
of recombinant CerS2 has shown that this enzyme prefers VLC fatty
acyl-CoA as substrates, to form VLC fatty acid containing ceramides.[23] This CerS2 substrate profile matches our lipidomic
profile, where we see the highest enrichment for VLC containing ceramide
species on LPs (e.g., C22:0, C24:0 ceramides; Figure C, Supporting Information Table 1). To test whether CerS2 was indeed the dominant ceramide
synthase in RAW264.7 cells, we performed ceramide synthase activity
assays using a VLC-CoA (C22:0-CoA) substrate on membrane lysates of
RAW264.7 cells using fumonisin B1 (referred as fumonisin), a fungal
natural product, which is a potent broad spectrum ceramide synthase
inhibitor.[24−26] In these assays, we found that the membrane lysates
of RAW264.7 cells had robust ceramide synthase activity forming C22:0
ceramide (a characteristic feature of CerS2), and this activity was
potently inhibited by fumonisin treatment (5 μM, 30 min; Figure B). We also confirmed
by Western blot analysis that CerS2 is indeed expressed abundantly
in the membrane lysates of RAW264.7 cells (Figure C). Having established CerS2 as the major
ceramide synthase in RAW264.7 cells, we wanted to assess whether this
enzyme is present on EPs and LPs, as maturing phagosomes acquire their
membranes predominantly from cellular components that they interact
with during their journey toward lysosomes (e.g., plasma membrane,
ER membrane).[4]
Figure 2
Identification of CerS2
as major ceramide synthase in RAW264.7 mouse macrophages. (A) The
reaction catalyzed by ceramide synthase. (B) Ceramide synthase in vitro activity assays on membrane lysates from RAW264.7
mouse macrophages treated with fumonisin (5 μM, 30 min) or DMSO,
showing robust inhibition of ceramide synthase activity following
fumonisin treatment. As a control, denatured membrane proteomes were
used. Data represent mean ± SEM for three biological replicates
per group. (C) Western blot analysis confirming abundant expression
of CerS2 in RAW264.7 membrane lysates. As a positive control, membrane
lysates from HEK293T were used. A total of 40 μg of lysate was
loaded for all samples in this analysis, and actin was used as a loading
control. The Western blot analysis was performed on five biological
replicates with reproducible results.
Identification of CerS2
as major ceramide synthase in RAW264.7 mouse macrophages. (A) The
reaction catalyzed by ceramide synthase. (B) Ceramide synthase in vitro activity assays on membrane lysates from RAW264.7
mouse macrophages treated with fumonisin (5 μM, 30 min) or DMSO,
showing robust inhibition of ceramide synthase activity following
fumonisin treatment. As a control, denatured membrane proteomes were
used. Data represent mean ± SEM for three biological replicates
per group. (C) Western blot analysis confirming abundant expression
of CerS2 in RAW264.7 membrane lysates. As a positive control, membrane
lysates from HEK293T were used. A total of 40 μg of lysate was
loaded for all samples in this analysis, and actin was used as a loading
control. The Western blot analysis was performed on five biological
replicates with reproducible results.Toward this, EPs and LPs were assessed for CerS2 content
by Western blot analysis. Very interestingly and contrary to our initial
expectations, we found that EPs had significantly more CerS2 than
LPs (∼3-fold; Figure A). Consistent with the enriched CerS2 on EPs, we found that
the ceramide synthase activity was ∼3 fold higher on EPs, compared
to LPs (Figure B).
As a control, we measured the cellular levels of CerS2 in RAW264.7
cells, during this treatment, and found no changes in CerS2 cellular
levels, suggesting that the change in CerS2 level was EP and LP specific
(Supporting Information Figure 1). Next,
we fed RAW264.7 cells with the unnatural long chain fatty acid, heptadecenoic
acid (C17:1 FFA, 1 mM, 4 h), and found that the C17:1 FFA was mostly
incorporated into cellular PC and PE pools in accordance with previous
studies (Supporting Information Figure 4).[27] We then prepared EPs and LPs by feeding
silica beads to cells containing C17:1-PC and PE from C17:1 FFA feeding.
The lipids from the EPs and LPs derived from this experiment were
enriched using previously described methods,[16,17,28] and these lipids were subjected to quantitative
lipidomics, looking specifically for C17:1 containing lipids from
different lipid classes (Supporting Information Table 1). Consistent with previous lipidomics studies (Figure C, Supporting Information Figure 2), we found that the levels
of N-17:1-ceramide were significantly elevated on
LPs (Figure C), and
there was a concomitant decrease in levels of C17:1-containing PC
and PE lipids on LPs (Supporting Information Table 1, Supporting Information Figure 5, 6). These results corroborate earlier lipidomics data (Figure , Supporting Information Figure 2) and seem to suggest that PC and PE classes
of phospholipids on EPs likely serve as the fatty acid donor for the
generation of fatty acyl-CoA that is eventually converted to ceramide
by the N-acylation action of CerS2.
Figure 3
Characterization of CerS2
activity during phagosomal maturation. (A) Western blot analysis confirming
the enrichment of CerS2 on EPs. As controls, EEA1 and LAMP1 were used
to assess the purity of EP and LP preparations, respectively. In each
case, 25 μg of lysate was loaded for all samples in this analysis,
and actin was used as a loading control. The Western blot analysis
was performed on eight biological replicates with reproducible results.
(B) Ceramide synthase in vitro activity assay on
EPs and LPs from RAW264.7 mouse macrophages, showing heightened ceramide
synthase activity on EPs. Data represents mean ± SEM for three
biological replicates per group. (C) Levels of C17:1 containing ceramide
on EPs and LPs, following feeding of RAW264.7 mouse macrophages with
1 mM C17:1 FFA (4 h, 37 °C). Data represent mean ± SEM for
five biological replicates. ***P < 0.001 for LP
group versus EP group by Student’s t test.
Characterization of CerS2
activity during phagosomal maturation. (A) Western blot analysis confirming
the enrichment of CerS2 on EPs. As controls, EEA1 and LAMP1 were used
to assess the purity of EP and LP preparations, respectively. In each
case, 25 μg of lysate was loaded for all samples in this analysis,
and actin was used as a loading control. The Western blot analysis
was performed on eight biological replicates with reproducible results.
(B) Ceramide synthase in vitro activity assay on
EPs and LPs from RAW264.7 mouse macrophages, showing heightened ceramide
synthase activity on EPs. Data represents mean ± SEM for three
biological replicates per group. (C) Levels of C17:1 containing ceramide
on EPs and LPs, following feeding of RAW264.7 mouse macrophages with
1 mM C17:1 FFA (4 h, 37 °C). Data represent mean ± SEM for
five biological replicates. ***P < 0.001 for LP
group versus EP group by Student’s t test.
Effects of Pharmacological
Blockade of Ceramide Synthase on Phagocytosis
To validate
if fumonisin was pharmacologically active, and to verify its effects
of inhibition of CerS2 in RAW264.7 cells, first, we treated RAW264.7
cells in situ with fumonisin (1 or 5 μM, 4
h). We found that following fumonisin treatment, ceramide formation
was potently inhibited, without the cells getting activated or undergoing
apoptosis (Supporting Information Figure 7). Next, we tested whether pharmacologically disrupting CerS2 had
any effect on phagosomal ceramide content. Toward this, we allowed
RAW264.7 cells to phagocytose silica beads for 30 min so as to generate
EPs, following which we treated cells in situ with
DMSO (LP-DMSO) or 5 μM fumonisin (LP-fumonisin) for 4 h and
harvested LPs at the end of this treatment using established protocols.[6] As a control for this study, we included EPs.
Lipids were extracted from each these phagosomal preparations and
subjected to LC-MS/MS lipidomic analysis looking specifically at the
concentration of phagosomal sphingolipids (Supporting Information Table 1). We were able to recapitulate changes
between the EP and LP-DMSO pools as seen previously, where VLC fatty
acid containing ceramides and sphingosine increased and decreased
respectively on phagosomes from the LP-DMSO group compared to the
EP group (Figure A).
Thus far, no other sphingolipid changed in our study, suggesting that
CerS2 is likely the major enzyme controlling the flux of sphingolipid
metabolism during phagosomal maturation. Corroborating this, we found
that the sphingolipid profiles for the phagosomes from the LP-fumonisin
group looked near identical to those from the EP group (Figure A).
Figure 4
Pharmacological blockade
of CerS2 hampering phagosomal maturation. (A) Concentration of ceramides
and sphingosine on LPs from RAW264.7 mouse macrophages following fumonisin
treatment (LP-fumonisin, 5 μM, 4 h, 37 °C). As controls,
EP and LP (LP-DMSO) were used. Data represent mean ± SEM for
four biological replicates per group. **P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001 for experimental groups (LP-fumonisin
and LP-DMSO) versus EP group by Student’s t test. (B) Western blot analysis confirming a defect in phagosomal
maturation following inhibition of CerS2. In each case for each group,
30 μg of lysate was loaded for all samples in this analysis,
and actin was also used as a loading control. The Western blot analysis
was performed in triplicate with reproducible results.
Pharmacological blockade
of CerS2 hampering phagosomal maturation. (A) Concentration of ceramides
and sphingosine on LPs from RAW264.7 mouse macrophages following fumonisin
treatment (LP-fumonisin, 5 μM, 4 h, 37 °C). As controls,
EP and LP (LP-DMSO) were used. Data represent mean ± SEM for
four biological replicates per group. **P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001 for experimental groups (LP-fumonisin
and LP-DMSO) versus EP group by Student’s t test. (B) Western blot analysis confirming a defect in phagosomal
maturation following inhibition of CerS2. In each case for each group,
30 μg of lysate was loaded for all samples in this analysis,
and actin was also used as a loading control. The Western blot analysis
was performed in triplicate with reproducible results.Having shown that pharmacologically inhibiting
CerS2 by fumonisin treatment leads to the impairment of phagosomal
ceramide synthesis, we wanted to determine whether this lipid profile
change had any functional effect on phagosomal maturation. We therefore
looked at the levels of CerS2, and known EP and LP markers, to determine
whether the pharmacological blockade of CerS2, indeed, has any effect
on phagosomal maturation. We find by Western blot analysis, as seen
previously, that CerS2 levels are lower on LPs (LP-DMSO group) than
EPs, and the phagosomes from the LP-fumonisin group have near EP levels
of CerS2 (Figure B).
We also find that the EP protein marker, EEA1, is enriched on the
phagosomal preparations from the EP group and the LP-fumonisin group
but not on the LP-DMSO group (Figure B). Finally, we find that the LP protein markers, LAMP1
and Rab7, are enriched on the LPs (LP-DMSO group), but not on EPs.
Interestingly, we find that the phagosomes from the LP-fumonisin group
have significantly lesser amounts of both LAMP1 and Rab7 compared
to the LP-DMSO group (Figure B). Taken together, these results suggest that the pharmacological
blockade of CerS2 results in partial blockade or delay in phagosomal
maturation.
Discussion
Our findings taken together
provide compelling evidence that mature phagosomes (LPs) are enriched
with ceramides, especially VLC fatty acid containing ceramides, which
are biosynthesized from sphingosine and fatty acyl-CoA by the action
of CerS2, a major ceramide synthase, in mammalian macrophages (Figures , 2). Interestingly and quite paradoxically, EPs have greater
amounts and heightened activity of CerS2. It appears that this increased
activity of CerS2 on EPs is an anticipatory mechanism that produces
ceramides, which are eventually found enriched on LPs (Figure ). This may stem from the possibility
that ceramides are needed for maturing phagosomes, yet once enough
ceramide is produced on EPs to facilitate the maturation process,
elevated CerS2 activity on LPs is no longer needed. Another possibility
is that cholesterol may be required for stabilizing ceramides on phagosomes.
So even though EPs have more CerS2, ceramide levels may still stay
low because phagosomes enrich in cholesterol content only at the LP
stage.[9] The regulation of CerS2 and ceramide
on EPs/LPs observed here might constitute a previously unknown feedback
lipid-signaling pathway in phagosomal maturation. We also show that
the pharmacological blockade of CerS2 results in depleting VLC fatty
acid containing ceramide levels on LPs, and thereby hampers the phagosomal
maturation process (Figure ). Additionally, from our data we speculate that the fatty
acyl-CoA substrate for CerS2 is likely synthesized from PC and PE
phospholipids present on EPs by unknown mechanisms (Figure E, Supporting Information Table 1, Supporting Information Figures 2, 3).Phagosomes accumulate cholesterol as they
mature, possibly making their membranes more rigid and making their
transport within cells to lysosomes efficient.[12]In vitro studies from others suggest that
ceramide is critical for stabilizing lipid rafts and making ordered
rigid membrane microdomains.[29] Our current
data along with studies from others suggest that the increased ceramide
on LPs is likely functioning to generate ordered lipid microdomains
on maturing phagosomes, thus enabling the recruitment of appropriate
proteins during the phagosome maturation process. Additionally, we
believe that the membrane-associated dynein motors that drive phagosome
transport toward lysosomes may be able to generate force efficiently
and in a more directed manner if the underlying ceramide rich membrane
is rigid and more organized.[9]Projecting
forward, the discovery of ceramide and CerS2 as a new player in phagosomal
maturation suggests that an as-of-yet unknown sphingolipid metabolism
pathway exists in mammalian phagosomal maturation (Figure ). Unlike mammals, Dictyostelium discoideum possess only a single isoform of
ceramide synthase, crsA, which shares ∼30%
sequence homology to the mammalian ceramide synthase isoforms with
100% conservation in the active site Lag1P motif
(Supporting Information Figure 8).[20,26] Our lipidomics studies on EPs and LPs (Supporting Information Figure 1, Supporting Information Table 1) suggest that this evolutionarily conserved enzyme
might serve as a nodal point for heightened ceramide levels on LPs
and might, in turn, be regulating phagosomal maturation even in primitive
eukaryotes. We speculate that this sphingolipid pathway has another
unannotated enzyme in mammals and primitive eukaryotes, a putative
fatty acyl-CoA transferase that generates fatty acyl-CoA from PC and/or
PE lipids (Figure ). Additionally, our lipidomics data also suggest that there exists
a phospholipase, which prefers PUFA containing PC and/or PE phospholipids
as substrates and produces free PUFAs that are found enriched on LPs
(Figure , Supporting Information Table 1). The discovery
of these enzymes would certainly help in a greater understanding of
phagosomal maturation and provide new insights into the spatiotemporal
regulation, cellular pathways crosstalk, and interdependence of this
very important immune response. Currently, however, there are no antibodies
or chemical reagents to study the ceramide lipid class and to map
proteins that would interact specifically with them. Generating specific
antibodies against ceramides and/or synthesizing photo-cross-linking
ceramide lipid probes, like those described in the literature, would
greatly advance our understanding of the protein ligands for ceramides,
and link these biochemically to the process of phagosomal maturation.[30,31] Finally, functional cell biological studies are required to better
understand the exact role that ceramides and CerS2 play in phagosomal
maturation. Our findings open up several new questions such as the
origin and mechanism of CerS2 localization on phagosomes, the effect
of ceramide on lipid microdomains and resultant transport of phagosomes
inside cells, and the possible synergistic requirement of cholesterol
and ceramide for the assembly of lipid rafts on a phagosome.[9]
Figure 5
Schematic representation of putative lipid pathways in
phagosomal maturation. As phagosomes mature, their ceramide content
increases due to the activity of CerS2, which is found enriched on
EPs. Two other cryptic activities are postulated in this scheme based
on our lipidomics results. The first, an unknown fatty acyl-CoA transferase,
which converts PC and/or PE to generate fatty acyl-CoA, which is eventually
converted to ceramide, by the N-acylation activity
of CerS2. The second is a PUFA-specific phospholipase activity, which
converts PUFA containing PC and/or PE lipids into free PUFAs that
are found enriched on LPs.
Schematic representation of putative lipid pathways in
phagosomal maturation. As phagosomes mature, their ceramide content
increases due to the activity of CerS2, which is found enriched on
EPs. Two other cryptic activities are postulated in this scheme based
on our lipidomics results. The first, an unknown fatty acyl-CoA transferase,
which converts PC and/or PE to generate fatty acyl-CoA, which is eventually
converted to ceramide, by the N-acylation activity
of CerS2. The second is a PUFA-specific phospholipase activity, which
converts PUFA containing PC and/or PE lipids into free PUFAs that
are found enriched on LPs.
Methods
Materials
All
chemicals, buffers, solvents, and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
unless otherwise mentioned. All MS quantitation lipid standards were
purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids Inc. unless otherwise mentioned.
Phagosome Preparations from RAW264.7 Cells
The RAW264.7
mouse macrophage cell line (ATCC) was cultured in Dulbecco’s
Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; HiMedia) with 10% (v/v) Fetal
Bovine Serum (FBS; Thermofisher Scientific) and 1% (v/v) Penicillin-Streptomycin
(MP Biomedicals) at 37 °C and 5% (v/v) CO2. Then,
10 × 10 cm culture dishes (Eppendorf) were used for phagosomal
preparations using a previously established protocol.[9] Briefly, 300 μL of 1-μm silica beads was washed
with DMEM (3 times), pelleted by centrifugation at 500g for 5 min after each wash, and finally resuspended in 1 mL of serum
free DMEM. This solution was vortexed, sonicated for 5 min, and added
to 30 mL of serum-free DMEM prewarmed to 37 °C. Three mL of this
solution was added to a 10 cm culture dish containing RAW264.7 cells
at 80% confluency. The cells were subsequently kept at 4 °C for
5 min to synchronize the uptake of beads. Postsynchronization, the
bead pulse was 15 min for EP or LP preparations. The unphagocytosed
beads were removed by washing the cells with sterile Phosphate Buffer
Saline (PBS; three times). For EP preparations, cells were harvested
at this stage and transferred to a sterile 50 mL tube, while for LP
preparations, the cells were cultured for 4 h in DMEM with 10% (v/v)
FBS at 37 °C. Upon desired bead maturation, the cells were washed
with sterile PBS (three times), harvested by scraping, and transferred
into sterile 50 mL tubes. The harvested cells are washed again in
sterile PBS (two times) and pelleted by spinning at 500g for 5 min after each wash. The cells were then washed with 25 mL
of lysis buffer (250 mM sucrose, 3 mM imidazole, pH 7.4) followed
by pelleting by centrifugation at 500g for 5 min.
Post-washing, the cells were resuspended in 1 mL of lysis buffer containing
protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), 3 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and
10 μg mL–1 pepstatin A. This cell suspension
was lysed using a cell cracker with a 10 μm clearance (Isobiotec)
by 10 passages through the syringes. This cellular lysate was overlaid
on a sucrose step gradient with 5 mL each of 85% (w/v) sucrose and
60% (w/v) sucrose with 3 mM imidazole. The gradient was centrifuged
at 100 000g at 4 °C for 1 h. The bead
pellet was separated from the cellular debris and resuspended in 200
μL of TNE buffer (50 mM Tris, 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) and stored
at −20 °C before processing for lipid extraction. For
the C17:1 FFA feeding experiment, the RAW264.7 cells in 10 cm culture
dish at 80% confluence were fed with 1 mM C17:1 FFA for 4 h prior
to starting the aforementioned phagosomal preparations. For CerS2
inhibition studies, 5 μM fumonisin was added after the initial
bead phagocytosis, post-synchronization, and the phagosomal preparations
were performed as described above.
Preparation of Phagosomes
from Dictyostelium discoideum
Phagosome
preparations from Dictyostelium discoideum were done
using established protocols.[9,32] Briefly, silica beads
(1 μm diameter, Polysciences Inc.) were washed in HL5 medium,
and the medium was separated by centrifugation (1000g, 5 min, 4 °C). The prewashed silica beads were resuspended
in 0.5 mL of Sorensen’s buffer and sonicated for 10 min. Dictyostelium discoideum AX-2 strain was grown to 6 million
cells mL–1 at 22 °C, at which point the cells
were pelleted by centrifugation at 900g for 5 min.
After resuspending the cell pellet in Sorensen’s buffer, the
prewashed silica beads were added and incubated with cells at 4 °C
for 15 min with gentle mixing for synchronous bead uptake. The pulse
begins by transferring the bead-cell suspension to 100 mL of HL5 medium
at 22 °C and 150 rpm to initiate phagosome formation. For EPs,
the pulse duration was 5 min with no chase, while LPs were pulsed
for 15 min and chased for 45 min after washing off the nonphagocytosed
beads. The pulse-chase cycle was quenched by the addition of 330 mL
of cold Sorensen’s buffer, and the cells were pelleted by centrifugation
at 900g for 5 min at 4 °C. The resulting cell
pellet was resuspended in 1:1 (w/v) LB-30 buffer containing 30% (w/v)
sucrose, 30 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 4 mM EGTA, protease inhibitor cocktail
(Roche), 3 mM DTT, 20 μg mL–1 pepstatin A,
5 mM phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride, and 5 mM benzamidine hydrochloride.
The cells were lysed using cell cracker (Isobiotec) with a 10 μm
clearance ball and 10 passage strokes. The lysate was layered on a
sucrose step gradient consisting of 4 mL each of 85% (w/v) and 65%
(w/v) sucrose solution containing 30 mM Tris and 4 mM EGTA. The gradient
was centrifuged at 100 000g for 1 h at 4 °C.
Purified phagosomes collected at the bottom of the tube and were resuspended
in 300 μL of sterile PBS by mild pipetting, and lipids were
extracted from them.
Lipid Extraction and Targeted Lipid Profiling
The phagosomal lipid extractions were performed using an established
protocol.[16,17,28] Briefly, the
phagosomal preparations were washed with sterile Dulbecco’s
PBS (DPBS; three times) and transferred into a glass vial using 1
mL of DPBS. A total of 3 mL of 2:1 (v/v) chloroform (CHCl3)/methanol (MeOH) with the internal standard mix (50 pmol of each
internal standard listed in Supporting Information Table 1) was added, and the mixture was vortexed. The two phases
were separated by centrifugation at 2800g for 5 min.
The organic phase (bottom) was removed. A total of 50 μL of
formic acid was added to acidify the aqueous homogenate, and CHCl3 was added to make up a 4 mL volume. The mixture was vortexed,
and separated by centrifugation at 2800g for 5 min.
Both the organic extracts were pooled and dried under a stream of
N2. The lipidome was solubilized in 200 μL of 2:1
(v/v) CHCl3/MeOH, and 20 μL was used for the lipidomics
analysis. All the lipid species analyzed in this study were quantified
using the multiple reaction monitoring high resolution (MRM-HR) scanning
method (Supporting Information Table 1)
on a Sciex X500R QTOF mass spectrometer (MS) fitted with an Exion-LC
series UHPLC. All data were acquired and analyzed using the SciexOS
software. The LC separation was achieved using a Gemini 5U C18 column
(Phenomenex, 5 μm, 50 × 4.6 mm) coupled to a Gemini guard
column (Phenomenex, 4 × 3 mm). The LC solvents were as follows:
positive mode, buffer A, 95:5 (v/v) H2O/MeOH + 0.1% formic
acid + 10 mM ammonium formate; buffer B, 60:35:5 (v/v) isopropanol
(IPA)/MeOH/H2O + 0.1% (v/v) formic acid + 10 mM ammonium
formate; negative mode, buffer A, 95:5 (v/v) H2O/MeOH +
0.1% (v/v) NH4OH; buffer B, 60:35:5 (v/v) IPA/MeOH/H2O + 0.1% (v/v) NH4OH. All the lipid estimations
were performed using an electrospray ion (ESI) source, with following
MS parameters: turbo spray ion source, medium collision gas, curtain
gas = 20 L min–1, ion spray voltage = 4500 V (positive
mode) or −5500 V (negative mode), at 400 °C. A typical
LC-run was 55 min, with the following solvent run sequence post injection:
0.3 mL min–1 0% B for 5 min, 0.5 mL min–1 0% B for 5 min, 0.5 mL min–1 linear gradient of
B from 0–100% over 25 min, 0.5 mL min–1 of
100% B for 10 min, and re-equilibration with 0.5 mL min–1 of 0% B for 10 min. A detailed list of all the species targeted
in this MRM-HR study, describing the precursor ion mass and adduct,
the product ion targeted, and MS voltage parameters can be found in Supporting Information Table 1. All the endogenous
lipid species were quantified by measuring the area under the curve
in comparison to the respective internal standard, and then normalizing
to the total protein content of the phagosomal preparation. All the
lipidomics data are represented as mean ± SEM of four (or more)
biological replicates per group (Supporting Information Table 1).
Western Blot Analysis
All Western
blots were done using established protocols[6,9] with
the following primary antibodies (rabbit)/anti-CerS2 (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich,
HPA027262) or anti-EEA-1 (1:2000, Cell Signaling Technology, 2411S)
or anti-LAMP1 (1:2000, Abcam, ab24170) or anti-Rab7 (1:2000, Abcam,
ab137029). The goat antirabbit IgG (H+L) HRP conjugated (1:10 000,
Abcam, ab6789) was used a secondary antibody (1 h, 25 °C), following
which the protein signal was visualized using the SuperSignal West
Pico Plus Chemiluminescent substrate (Thermofisher Scientific) on
a Syngene G-Box Chemi-XRQ gel documentation system.
Ceramide Synthase
Substrate Assays
The substrate assay was adapted from a previously
described protocol albeit with a different substrate.[26] Briefly, 50 μM behenoyl-coenzyme A (C22:0-CoA) and
20 μM sphingosine were mixed by sonication and incubated at
37 °C with shaking at 750 rpm for 5 min, following which 10 μg
of proteome was added to a final volume of 100 μL in DPBS, and
the mixture was incubated at 37 °C with shaking at 750 rpm for
30 min. The reaction was quenched by the addition of 250 μL
of 2:1 CHCl3/MeOH containing 50 pmol of N-25:0-ceramide internal standard, and the mixture was vigorously
vortexed. The two phases were separated by centrifugation at 2800g for 5 min, and the organic phase (bottom) was removed.
The organic extracts were dried under a stream of N2 and
solubilized in 100 μL of 2:1 (v/v) CHCl3/MeOH. The
LC-MS protocol was similar to a previously established protocol.[33] All MS analysis was performed using an ESI in
the positive ion mode for ceramide formation. All MS parameters are
described in Supporting Information Table 1. Measuring the area under the peak, and normalizing it to the internal
standard, quantified the product formed for the ceramide synthase
assays. The enzymatic rate was corrected by subtracting the nonenzymatic
rate of hydrolysis, which was obtained by using heat denatured proteome
as a control. All the data are represented as mean ± SEM of at
least three biological replicates.
Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as mean ± SEM of three (or more) biological
replicates per group for substrate assays, and as mean ± SEM
of at least four (or more) biological replicates per group for lipidomics
experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism
7 (Mac OS X), and the Student’s t test (two-tailed)
of this software was used to calculate statistical significance between
the different study groups. A P value of <0.05
was considered statistically significant in this study.
Authors: Micah J Niphakis; Kenneth M Lum; Armand B Cognetta; Bruno E Correia; Taka-Aki Ichu; Jose Olucha; Steven J Brown; Soumajit Kundu; Fabiana Piscitelli; Hugh Rosen; Benjamin F Cravatt Journal: Cell Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Elad L Laviad; Lee Albee; Irene Pankova-Kholmyansky; Sharon Epstein; Hyejung Park; Alfred H Merrill; Anthony H Futerman Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2007-12-28 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Siddhesh S Kamat; Kaddy Camara; William H Parsons; Dong-Hui Chen; Melissa M Dix; Thomas D Bird; Amy R Howell; Benjamin F Cravatt Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 15.040