Literature DB >> 29963562

Machine learning for detection of lymphedema among breast cancer survivors.

Mei R Fu1, Yao Wang2, Chenge Li2, Zeyuan Qiu3, Deborah Axelrod4,5, Amber A Guth4,5, Joan Scagliola5, Yvette Conley6, Bradley E Aouizerat7, Jeanna M Qiu8, Gary Yu1, Janet H Van Cleave1, Judith Haber1, Ying Kuen Cheung9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the digital era when mHealth has emerged as an important venue for health care, the application of computer science, such as machine learning, has proven to be a powerful tool for health care in detecting or predicting various medical conditions by providing improved accuracy over conventional statistical or expert-based systems. Symptoms are often indicators for abnormal changes in body functioning due to illness or side effects from medical treatment. Real-time symptom report refers to the report of symptoms that patients are experiencing at the time of reporting. The use of machine learning integrating real-time patient-centered symptom report and real-time clinical analytics to develop real-time precision prediction may improve early detection of lymphedema and long term clinical decision support for breast cancer survivors who face lifelong risk of lymphedema. Lymphedema, which is associated with more than 20 distressing symptoms, is one of the most distressing and dreaded late adverse effects from breast cancer treatment. Currently there is no cure for lymphedema, but early detection can help patients to receive timely intervention to effectively manage lymphedema. Because lymphedema can occur immediately after cancer surgery or as late as 20 years after surgery, real-time detection of lymphedema using machine learning is paramount to achieve timely detection that can reduce the risk of lymphedema progression to chronic or severe stages. This study appraised the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity to detect lymphedema status using machine learning algorithms based on real-time symptom report.
METHODS: A web-based study was conducted to collect patients' real-time report of symptoms using a mHealth system. Data regarding demographic and clinical information, lymphedema status, and symptom features were collected. A total of 355 patients from 45 states in the US completed the study. Statistical and machine learning procedures were performed for data analysis. The performance of five renowned classification algorithms of machine learning were compared: Decision Tree of C4.5, Decision Tree of C5.0, gradient boosting model (GBM), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM). Each classification algorithm has certain user-definable hyper parameters. Five-fold cross validation was used to optimize these hyper parameters and to choose the parameters that led to the highest average cross validation accuracy.
RESULTS: Using machine leaning procedures comparing different algorithms is feasible. The ANN achieved the best performance for detecting lymphedema with accuracy of 93.75%, sensitivity of 95.65%, and specificity of 91.03%.
CONCLUSIONS: A well-trained ANN classifier using real-time symptom report can provide highly accurate detection of lymphedema. Such detection accuracy is significantly higher than that achievable by current and often used clinical methods such as bio-impedance analysis. Use of a well-trained classification algorithm to detect lymphedema based on symptom features is a highly promising tool that may improve lymphedema outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Machine learning; lymphedema; real-time; symptom

Year:  2018        PMID: 29963562      PMCID: PMC5994440          DOI: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.04.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mhealth        ISSN: 2306-9740


  27 in total

Review 1.  An integrated approach to an analysis of symptom management in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Mei R Fu; Priscilla LeMone; Roxanne W McDaniel
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  A comparison of four diagnostic criteria for lymphedema in a post-breast cancer population.

Authors:  Jane M Armer; Bob R Stewart
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.589

3.  Minimal limb volume change has a significant impact on breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  J N Cormier; Y Xing; I Zaniletti; R L Askew; B R Stewart; J M Armer
Journal:  Lymphology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.286

4.  The effect of providing information about lymphedema on the cognitive and symptom outcomes of breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Mei R Fu; Constance M Chen; Judith Haber; Amber A Guth; Deborah Axelrod
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Putting evidence into practice: cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Mei R Fu; Jie Deng; Jane M Armer
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.027

6.  Pre-operative assessment enables early diagnosis and recovery of shoulder function in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Barbara A Springer; Ellen Levy; Charles McGarvey; Lucinda A Pfalzer; Nicole L Stout; Lynn H Gerber; Peter W Soballe; Jerome Danoff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Preoperative assessment enables the early diagnosis and successful treatment of lymphedema.

Authors:  Nicole L Stout Gergich; Lucinda A Pfalzer; Charles McGarvey; Barbara Springer; Lynn H Gerber; Peter Soballe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Predicting breast cancer-related lymphedema using self-reported symptoms.

Authors:  Jane M Armer; M Elise Radina; Davina Porock; Scott D Culbertson
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements.

Authors:  Sarah A McLaughlin; Mary J Wright; Katherine T Morris; Gladys L Giron; Michelle R Sampson; Julia P Brockway; Karen E Hurley; Elyn R Riedel; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Symptom report in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Mei R Fu; Deborah Axelrod; Charles M Cleland; Zeyuan Qiu; Amber A Guth; Robin Kleinman; Joan Scagliola; Judith Haber
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2015-10-15
View more
  10 in total

1.  Real-time detection and management of chronic illnesses.

Authors:  Mei R Fu
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2021-01-20

Review 2.  Use of technology to facilitate a prospective surveillance program for breast cancer-related lymphedema at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

Authors:  Lauren M Havens; Cheryl L Brunelle; Tessa C Gillespie; Madison Bernstein; Loryn K Bucci; Yara W Kassamani; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2021-01-20

3.  Human-centered approaches that integrate sensor technology across the lifespan: Opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Teresa M Ward; Marjorie Skubic; Marilyn Rantz; Allison Vorderstrasse
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Real-time electronic patient evaluation of lymphedema symptoms, referral, and satisfaction: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Nahum; Mei R Fu; Joan Scagliola; Martha Rodorigo; Sandy Tobik; Amber Guth; Deborah Axelrod
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2021-04-20

5.  Radiogenomic analysis of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with diffuse gliomas.

Authors:  Zhiyan Sun; Yiming Li; Yinyan Wang; Xing Fan; Kaibin Xu; Kai Wang; Shaowu Li; Zhong Zhang; Tao Jiang; Xing Liu
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  ATRX status in patients with gliomas: Radiomics analysis.

Authors:  Linlin Meng; Ran Zhang; Liangguo Fa; Lulu Zhang; Linlin Wang; Guangrui Shao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Prediction of lymphedema occurrence in patients with breast cancer using the optimized combination of ensemble learning algorithm and feature selection.

Authors:  Anaram Yaghoobi Notash; Aidin Yaghoobi Notash; Zahra Omidi; Shahpar Haghighat
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence and lymphedema: State of the art.

Authors:  Abdullah S Eldaly; Francisco R Avila; Ricardo A Torres-Guzman; Karla Maita; John P Garcia; Luiza Palmieri Serrano; Antonio J Forte
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 9.  Prediction models for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and critical appraisal.

Authors:  Qiu Lin; Tong Yang; Jin Yongmei; Ye Mao Die
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-13

10.  Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of the LLIS and ULL27 in Detecting Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Authors:  Michelle Coriddi; Leslie Kim; Leslie McGrath; Elizabeth Encarnacion; Nicholas Brereton; Yin Shen; Andrea V Barrio; Babak Mehrara; Joseph H Dayan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 5.344

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.