BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BPD) features cycling mood states ranging from depression to mania with intermittent phases of euthymia. Bipolar disorder subjects often show excessive goal-directed and pleasure-seeking behavior during manic episodes and reduced hedonic capacity during depressive episodes, indicating that BPD might involve altered reward processing. Our goal was to test the hypothesis that BPD is characterized by impairments in adjusting behavior as a function of prior reinforcement history, particularly in the presence of residual anhedonic symptoms. METHODS: Eighteen medicated BPD subjects and 25 demographically matched comparison subjects performed a probabilistic reward task. To identify putative dysfunctions in reward processing irrespective of mood state, primary analyses focused on euthymic BPD subjects (n = 13). With signal-detection methodologies, response bias toward a more frequently rewarded stimulus was used to objectively assess the participants' propensity to modulate behavior as a function of reinforcement history. RESULTS: Relative to comparison subjects, euthymic BPD subjects showed a reduced and delayed acquisition of response bias toward the more frequently rewarded stimulus, which was partially due to increased sensitivity to single rewards of the disadvantageous stimulus. Analyses considering the entire BPD sample revealed that reduced reward learning correlated with self-reported anhedonic symptoms, even after adjusting for residual manic and anxious symptoms and general distress. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides preliminary evidence indicating that BPD, even during euthymic states, is characterized by dysfunctional reward learning in situations requiring integration of reinforcement information over time and thus offers initial insights about the potential source of dysfunctional reward processing in this disorder.
BACKGROUND:Bipolar disorder (BPD) features cycling mood states ranging from depression to mania with intermittent phases of euthymia. Bipolar disorder subjects often show excessive goal-directed and pleasure-seeking behavior during manic episodes and reduced hedonic capacity during depressive episodes, indicating that BPD might involve altered reward processing. Our goal was to test the hypothesis that BPD is characterized by impairments in adjusting behavior as a function of prior reinforcement history, particularly in the presence of residual anhedonic symptoms. METHODS: Eighteen medicated BPD subjects and 25 demographically matched comparison subjects performed a probabilistic reward task. To identify putative dysfunctions in reward processing irrespective of mood state, primary analyses focused on euthymic BPD subjects (n = 13). With signal-detection methodologies, response bias toward a more frequently rewarded stimulus was used to objectively assess the participants' propensity to modulate behavior as a function of reinforcement history. RESULTS: Relative to comparison subjects, euthymic BPD subjects showed a reduced and delayed acquisition of response bias toward the more frequently rewarded stimulus, which was partially due to increased sensitivity to single rewards of the disadvantageous stimulus. Analyses considering the entire BPD sample revealed that reduced reward learning correlated with self-reported anhedonic symptoms, even after adjusting for residual manic and anxious symptoms and general distress. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides preliminary evidence indicating that BPD, even during euthymic states, is characterized by dysfunctional reward learning in situations requiring integration of reinforcement information over time and thus offers initial insights about the potential source of dysfunctional reward processing in this disorder.
Authors: F C Murphy; J S Rubinsztein; A Michael; R D Rogers; T W Robbins; E S Paykel; B J Sahakian Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Brendan A Rich; Robinder K Bhangoo; Deborah T Vinton; Lisa H Berghorst; Daniel P Dickstein; Christian Grillon; Richard J Davidson; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Eddie Harmon-Jones; Lyn Y Abramson; Robin Nusslock; Jonathan D Sigelman; Snezana Urosevic; Lee D Turonie; Lauren B Alloy; Meghan Fearn Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Hilary P Blumberg; Hoi-Chung Leung; Pawel Skudlarski; Cheryl M Lacadie; Carolyn A Fredericks; Brent C Harris; Dennis S Charney; John C Gore; John H Krystal; Bradley S Peterson Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2003-06
Authors: Deanna M Barch; Cameron S Carter; James M Gold; Sheri L Johnson; Ann M Kring; Angus W MacDonald; Diego A Pizzagalli; J Daniel Ragland; Steven M Silverstein; Milton E Strauss Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2017-04-13
Authors: John D Ragland; Roshan Cools; Michael Frank; Diego A Pizzagalli; Alison Preston; Charan Ranganath; Anthony D Wagner Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2008-10-16 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Rachel Hershenberg; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Aylin Daldal; Natalie Katchmar; Tyler M Moore; Joseph W Kable; Daniel H Wolf Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Junghee Lee; Eric A Reavis; Stephen A Engel; Lori L Altshuler; Mark S Cohen; David C Glahn; Keith H Nuechterlein; Jonathan K Wynn; Michael F Green Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Gabrielle I Liverant; Denise M Sloan; Diego A Pizzagalli; Christopher B Harte; Barbara W Kamholz; Laina E Rosebrock; Andrew L Cohen; Maurizio Fava; Gary B Kaplan Journal: Behav Ther Date: 2014-02-13
Authors: Elske Vrieze; Diego A Pizzagalli; Koen Demyttenaere; Titia Hompes; Pascal Sienaert; Peter de Boer; Mark Schmidt; Stephan Claes Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-12-08 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Junghee Lee; Lori Altshuler; David C Glahn; David J Miklowitz; Kevin Ochsner; Michael F Green Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 18.112