Nora M Haney1, Andrew Gabrielson1, Taylor P Kohn2, Wayne J G Hellstrom3. 1. Tulane University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, New Orleans, LA, USA. 2. Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Urology, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Tulane University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, New Orleans, LA, USA. Electronic address: whellst@tulane.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Stem cell therapy using stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is a promising treatment modality. SVF is comprised of a mixture of adipose-derived stem cells, endothelial precursor cells, and immune modulatory cells that act synergistically to facilitate angiogenesis and epithelial cell differentiation. This makes SVF an attractive option for men's sexual disorders that require reconstitution of vasculature and endothelial lining, namely erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie's disease (PD). AIM: The objective of this study was to compare and contrast the available literature regarding the use of SVF in the treatment of male sexual dysfunction. METHODS: A literature review was performed in PubMed with the keywords "stromal vascular fraction" and/or "erectile dysfunction" and/or "Peyronie's disease" and/or "sexual dysfunction." MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure for preclinical studies was erectile function, as measured by changes in intracavernous pressures, and results of histopathologic analysis of corporal tissue. Clinical endpoint analysis in humans included various patient questionnaires. RESULTS: For ED, there were 5 preclinical studies included in the analysis, with 1 Phase 1 clinical trial in humans. Major limitations of both the preclinical and clinical studies included the absence of SVF component analysis, and short duration of follow-up. Despite a paucity of preclinical studies, there was a single clinical study assessing the efficacy of combination SVF and shock wave therapy in the treatment of PD. Limitations of this study included an absence of a control group and the use of subjective data. CONCLUSION: Preclinical and clinical data in the use of SVF for the treatment of male sexual dysfunction is deficient. Even though multiple medicinal disciplines are studying the use of SVF on a myriad of pathologies, further investigative work elucidating the mechanism and potential adverse effects of SVF need to be performed before clinical trials are undertaken. Haney NM, Gabrielson A, Kohn TP, Hellstrom WJG. The Use of Stromal Vascular Fraction in the Treatment of Male Sexual Dysfunction: A Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:313-320.
INTRODUCTION: Stem cell therapy using stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is a promising treatment modality. SVF is comprised of a mixture of adipose-derived stem cells, endothelial precursor cells, and immune modulatory cells that act synergistically to facilitate angiogenesis and epithelial cell differentiation. This makes SVF an attractive option for men's sexual disorders that require reconstitution of vasculature and endothelial lining, namely erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie's disease (PD). AIM: The objective of this study was to compare and contrast the available literature regarding the use of SVF in the treatment of male sexual dysfunction. METHODS: A literature review was performed in PubMed with the keywords "stromal vascular fraction" and/or "erectile dysfunction" and/or "Peyronie's disease" and/or "sexual dysfunction." MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure for preclinical studies was erectile function, as measured by changes in intracavernous pressures, and results of histopathologic analysis of corporal tissue. Clinical endpoint analysis in humans included various patient questionnaires. RESULTS: For ED, there were 5 preclinical studies included in the analysis, with 1 Phase 1 clinical trial in humans. Major limitations of both the preclinical and clinical studies included the absence of SVF component analysis, and short duration of follow-up. Despite a paucity of preclinical studies, there was a single clinical study assessing the efficacy of combination SVF and shock wave therapy in the treatment of PD. Limitations of this study included an absence of a control group and the use of subjective data. CONCLUSION: Preclinical and clinical data in the use of SVF for the treatment of male sexual dysfunction is deficient. Even though multiple medicinal disciplines are studying the use of SVF on a myriad of pathologies, further investigative work elucidating the mechanism and potential adverse effects of SVF need to be performed before clinical trials are undertaken. Haney NM, Gabrielson A, Kohn TP, Hellstrom WJG. The Use of Stromal Vascular Fraction in the Treatment of Male Sexual Dysfunction: A Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:313-320.
Authors: James L Liu; Kevin Y Chu; Andrew T Gabrielson; Run Wang; Landon Trost; Gregory Broderick; Kelvin Davies; Gerald Brock; John Mulhall; Ranjith Ramasamy; Trinity J Bivalacqua Journal: Sex Med Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 2.491
Authors: Mark Bieri; Elias Said; Gabrielle Antonini; Donald Dickerson; Jorge Tuma; Courtney E Bartlett; Amit N Patel; Alexander Gershman Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 5.531