Literature DB >> 29960316

Comparison of permutationally invariant polynomials, neural networks, and Gaussian approximation potentials in representing water interactions through many-body expansions.

Thuong T Nguyen1, Eszter Székely2, Giulio Imbalzano3, Jörg Behler4, Gábor Csányi2, Michele Ceriotti3, Andreas W Götz5, Francesco Paesani1.   

Abstract

The accurate representation of multidimensional potential energy surfaces is a necessary requirement for realistic computer simulations of molecular systems. The continued increase in computer power accompanied by advances in correlated electronic structure methods nowadays enables routine calculations of accurate interaction energies for small systems, which can then be used as references for the development of analytical potential energy functions (PEFs) rigorously derived from many-body (MB) expansions. Building on the accuracy of the MB-pol many-body PEF, we investigate here the performance of permutationally invariant polynomials (PIPs), neural networks, and Gaussian approximation potentials (GAPs) in representing water two-body and three-body interaction energies, denoting the resulting potentials PIP-MB-pol, Behler-Parrinello neural network-MB-pol, and GAP-MB-pol, respectively. Our analysis shows that all three analytical representations exhibit similar levels of accuracy in reproducing both two-body and three-body reference data as well as interaction energies of small water clusters obtained from calculations carried out at the coupled cluster level of theory, the current gold standard for chemical accuracy. These results demonstrate the synergy between interatomic potentials formulated in terms of a many-body expansion, such as MB-pol, that are physically sound and transferable, and machine-learning techniques that provide a flexible framework to approximate the short-range interaction energy terms.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29960316     DOI: 10.1063/1.5024577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  6 in total

1.  Solvation Free Energy Calculations with Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics and Machine Learning Models.

Authors:  Pan Zhang; Lin Shen; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 2.  How Machine Learning Will Revolutionize Electrochemical Sciences.

Authors:  Aashutosh Mistry; Alejandro A Franco; Samuel J Cooper; Scott A Roberts; Venkatasubramanian Viswanathan
Journal:  ACS Energy Lett       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 23.101

3.  Local Kernel Regression and Neural Network Approaches to the Conformational Landscapes of Oligopeptides.

Authors:  Raimon Fabregat; Alberto Fabrizio; Edgar A Engel; Benjamin Meyer; Veronika Juraskova; Michele Ceriotti; Clemence Corminboeuf
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Kernel-Based Machine Learning for Efficient Simulations of Molecular Liquids.

Authors:  Christoph Scherer; René Scheid; Denis Andrienko; Tristan Bereau
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Atomic Partitioning of the MPn (n = 2, 3, 4) Dynamic Electron Correlation Energy by the Interacting Quantum Atoms Method: A Fast and Accurate Electrostatic Potential Integral Approach.

Authors:  Mark A Vincent; Arnaldo F Silva; Paul L A Popelier
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Automated discovery of a robust interatomic potential for aluminum.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Benjamin Nebgen; Nithin Mathew; Jie Chen; Nicholas Lubbers; Leonid Burakovsky; Sergei Tretiak; Hai Ah Nam; Timothy Germann; Saryu Fensin; Kipton Barros
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.