Geoff Bardwell1, Thomas Kerr1, Jade Boyd2, Ryan McNeil3. 1. British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada. 2. British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada. 3. British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada. Electronic address: rmcneil@cfenet.ubc.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: A growing body of research points to increasing peer involvement in programs for people who use drugs, although this work has focused primarily on naloxone education and distribution. This study extends this work by examining the roles of peers in leading a novel overdose response program within emergency shelters. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 people who use drugs, recruited from two emergency shelters, as well as ethnographic observation in these settings. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically with attention to peer roles. RESULTS: Four themes emerged from the data. First, participants discussed the development of peer support through relationship building and trust. Second, participants described a level of safety using drugs in front of peer workers due to their shared lived experience. Third, peer workers were described as favorable compared to non-peer staff because of nominal power dynamics and past negative experiences with non-peer staff. Last, given the context of the overdose crisis, peer worker roles were often routinized informally across the social networks of residents, which fostered a collective obligation to respond to overdoses. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that participants regarded peer workers as providing a range of unique benefits. They emphasized the critical role of both social networks and informal roles in optimizing overdose responses. The scaling up of peer programming in distinct risk environments such as emergency shelters through both formal and informal roles has potential to help improve overdose prevention efforts, including in settings not well served by conventional public health programming.
OBJECTIVES: A growing body of research points to increasing peer involvement in programs for people who use drugs, although this work has focused primarily on naloxone education and distribution. This study extends this work by examining the roles of peers in leading a novel overdose response program within emergency shelters. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 people who use drugs, recruited from two emergency shelters, as well as ethnographic observation in these settings. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically with attention to peer roles. RESULTS: Four themes emerged from the data. First, participants discussed the development of peer support through relationship building and trust. Second, participants described a level of safety using drugs in front of peer workers due to their shared lived experience. Third, peer workers were described as favorable compared to non-peer staff because of nominal power dynamics and past negative experiences with non-peer staff. Last, given the context of the overdose crisis, peer worker roles were often routinized informally across the social networks of residents, which fostered a collective obligation to respond to overdoses. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that participants regarded peer workers as providing a range of unique benefits. They emphasized the critical role of both social networks and informal roles in optimizing overdose responses. The scaling up of peer programming in distinct risk environments such as emergency shelters through both formal and informal roles has potential to help improve overdose prevention efforts, including in settings not well served by conventional public health programming.
Authors: Margaret R Weeks; Jianghong Li; Julia Dickson-Gomez; Mark Convey; Maria Martinez; Kim Radda; Scott Clair Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Karla D Wagner; Peter J Davidson; Ellen Iverson; Rachel Washburn; Emily Burke; Alex H Kral; Miles McNeeley; Jennifer Jackson Bloom; Stephen E Lankenau Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2013-08-09
Authors: Julie K O'Donnell; John Halpin; Christine L Mattson; Bruce A Goldberger; R Matthew Gladden Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2017-11-03 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Alissa M Greer; Serena A Luchenski; Ashraf A Amlani; Katie Lacroix; Charlene Burmeister; Jane A Buxton Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Abigail K Winiker; Karin E Tobin; Rachel E Gicquelais; Jill Owczarzak; Carl Latkin Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Jenna Valleriani; Rebecca Haines-Saah; Rielle Capler; Ricky Bluthenthal; M Eugenia Socias; M J Milloy; Thomas Kerr; Ryan McNeil Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2020-04-11
Authors: Suzan M Walters; Joey Platt; Amarachi Anakaraonye; Sarit A Golub; Chinazo O Cunningham; Brianna L Norton; Jae M Sevelius; Oni J Blackstock Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-06-17