Literature DB >> 29960165

The time-course of cortical responses to speech revealed by fast optical imaging.

Joseph C Toscano1, Nathaniel D Anderson2, Monica Fabiani2, Gabriele Gratton2, Susan M Garnsey2.   

Abstract

Recent work has sought to describe the time-course of spoken word recognition, from initial acoustic cue encoding through lexical activation, and identify cortical areas involved in each stage of analysis. However, existing methods are limited in either temporal or spatial resolution, and as a result, have only provided partial answers to the question of how listeners encode acoustic information in speech. We present data from an experiment using a novel neuroimaging method, fast optical imaging, to directly assess the time-course of speech perception, providing non-invasive measurement of speech sound representations, localized to specific cortical areas. We find that listeners encode speech in terms of continuous acoustic cues at early stages of processing (ca. 96 ms post-stimulus onset), and begin activating phonological category representations rapidly (ca. 144 ms post-stimulus). Moreover, cue-based representations are widespread in the brain and overlap in time with graded category-based representations, suggesting that spoken word recognition involves simultaneous activation of both continuous acoustic cues and phonological categories.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Event-related potentials; Optical imaging; Phonological categorization; Speech perception; Spoken language processing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29960165      PMCID: PMC6102048          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  54 in total

1.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

2.  Low-Frequency Cortical Entrainment to Speech Reflects Phoneme-Level Processing.

Authors:  Giovanni M Di Liberto; James A O'Sullivan; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Hierarchical organization of human auditory cortex: evidence from acoustic invariance in the response to intelligible speech.

Authors:  Kayoko Okada; Feng Rong; Jon Venezia; William Matchin; I-Hui Hsieh; Kourosh Saberi; John T Serences; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  A critical analysis of linear inverse solutions to the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem.

Authors:  R Grave de Peralta-Menendez; S L Gonzalez-Andino
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception.

Authors:  C A Fowler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-10

7.  Inferior frontal regions underlie the perception of phonetic category invariance.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Sheila E Blumstein; Edward Walsh; James Eliassen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-06-08

8.  Inferior Frontal Cortex Contributions to the Recognition of Spoken Words and Their Constituent Speech Sounds.

Authors:  Jack C Rogers; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Reconstructing speech from human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian N Pasley; Stephen V David; Nima Mesgarani; Adeen Flinker; Shihab A Shamma; Nathan E Crone; Robert T Knight; Edward F Chang
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Dynamic Encoding of Acoustic Features in Neural Responses to Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Bahar Khalighinejad; Guilherme Cruzatto da Silva; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Plasticity in auditory categorization is supported by differential engagement of the auditory-linguistic network.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Breya Walker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Neural Representation of Articulable and Inarticulable Novel Sound Contrasts: The Role of the Dorsal Stream.

Authors:  David I Saltzman; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Neurobiol Lang (Camb)       Date:  2020-08

3.  Decoding of single-trial EEG reveals unique states of functional brain connectivity that drive rapid speech categorization decisions.

Authors:  Rakib Al-Fahad; Mohammed Yeasin; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Transformation of a temporal speech cue to a spatial neural code in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Neal P Fox; Matthew Leonard; Matthias J Sjerps; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Data-driven machine learning models for decoding speech categorization from evoked brain responses.

Authors:  Md Sultan Mahmud; Mohammed Yeasin; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Lexical Influences on Categorical Speech Perception Are Driven by a Temporoparietal Circuit.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Claire Pearson; Ashleigh Harrison
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.420

7.  Effects of Noise on the Behavioral and Neural Categorization of Speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Lauren C Bush; Alex M Boudreaux
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.