Literature DB >> 29959928

A new multichannel method quantitating TUNEL in detached photoreceptor nuclei.

Tyler Heisler-Taylor1, Bongsu Kim2, Alana Y Reese2, Sumaya Hamadmad2, Rania Kusibati2, Andy J Fischer3, Colleen M Cebulla4.   

Abstract

Nuclear co-localization labels are critical to ocular research. Among these, the TUNEL assay has been established as a gold standard of cell death and apoptosis. While several validated computer-based methods exist to quantitate these markers, including ImageJ Retina Analysis (RA) Toolkit and ImagePro, none verify the count with the nuclear counter stain to confirm nuclear co-localization. We established a new ImageJ-based automated multichannel thresholding (MCT) method to quantitate nuclear co-localized labeling. The MCT method was validated by comparing it with the two published TUNEL analysis in TUNEL-positive photoreceptors in an experimental retinal detachment (RD) model. RDs were induced in murine eyes and cross-sectional images of TUNEL and DAPI counter stain were obtained. Images were classified as "typical" or high density "hotspot" TUNEL regions (n = 10/group). Images were analyzed and compared between the MCT method and the published techniques including both "standard" and "high" settings of the RA Toolkit for detecting lower or higher TUNEL densities, respectively. Additional testing of the MCT method with built-in ImageJ thresholding algorithms was performed to produce fully automated measurements. All images were compared with Bland-Altman mean difference plots to assess the difference in counts and linear regression plots to assess correlation. Comparison between the MCT method and the ImagePro method were found to be well correlated (typical: R2 = 0.8972, hotspot: R2 = 0.9000) with minor to non-significant differences. The RA Toolkit settings were found to be mostly well correlated as well (standard/typical: R2 = 0.8036, standard/hotspot: R2 = 0.4309, high/typical: R2 = 0.7895, high/hotspot: R2 = 0.8738) but were often found to have significantly higher counts than the MCT. In conclusion, the MCT method compared favorably with validated computer-based methods of nuclear marker immunofluorescence quantitation and avoids staining artifacts through the incorporation of the nuclear counter stain to confirm positive cells.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis; Cell death; Image analysis; ImageJ; Retina; Retinal detachment; TUNEL; Thresholding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29959928      PMCID: PMC6215716          DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  18 in total

1.  A Novel ImageJ Macro for Automated Cell Death Quantitation in the Retina.

Authors:  Daniel E Maidana; Pavlina Tsoka; Bo Tian; Bernard Dib; Hidetaka Matsumoto; Keiko Kataoka; Haijiang Lin; Joan W Miller; Demetrios G Vavvas
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

Authors:  Caroline A Schneider; Wayne S Rasband; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 3.  Retinal neurodegeneration: early pathology in diabetes.

Authors:  E Lieth; T W Gardner; A J Barber; D A Antonetti
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Retinal MMP-12, MMP-13, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 expression in murine experimental retinal detachment.

Authors:  Bongsu Kim; Mohamed H Abdel-Rahman; Tiffany Wang; Severin Pouly; Ashraf M Mahmoud; Colleen M Cebulla
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Rod photoreceptor neurite sprouting in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Z Y Li; I J Kljavin; A H Milam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Expression of apoptosis markers in the retinas of human subjects with diabetes.

Authors:  Ahmed M Abu-El-Asrar; Lieve Dralands; Luc Missotten; Ibrahim A Al-Jadaan; Karel Geboes
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Cellular responses following retinal injuries and therapeutic approaches for neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Nicolás Cuenca; Laura Fernández-Sánchez; Laura Campello; Victoria Maneu; Pedro De la Villa; Pedro Lax; Isabel Pinilla
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 21.198

8.  Apoptotic photoreceptor cell death after traumatic retinal detachment in humans.

Authors:  C J Chang; W W Lai; D P Edward; M O Tso
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-07

9.  A chick model of retinal detachment: cone rich and novel.

Authors:  Colleen M Cebulla; Chris P Zelinka; Melissa A Scott; Martin Lubow; Amanda Bingham; Stephen Rasiah; Ashraf M Mahmoud; Andy J Fischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation.

Authors:  Y Gavrieli; Y Sherman; S A Ben-Sasson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Apoptosis detection: a purpose-dependent approach selection.

Authors:  Maojuan Guo; Bin Lu; Jiali Gan; Shuangcui Wang; Xijuan Jiang; Huhu Li
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Advances in the development of biodegradable coronary stents: A translational perspective.

Authors:  Jiabin Zong; Quanwei He; Yuxiao Liu; Min Qiu; Jiehong Wu; Bo Hu
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-07-19

3.  Oral Selumetinib Does Not Negatively Impact Photoreceptor Survival in Murine Experimental Retinal Detachment.

Authors:  Colleen M Cebulla; Bongsu Kim; Valerie George; Tyler Heisler-Taylor; Sumaya Hamadmad; Alana Y Reese; Shaili S Kothari; Rania Kusibati; Hailey Wilson; Mohamed H Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 4.799

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.