Literature DB >> 29959452

Attention orienting near the hand following performed and imagined actions.

John P Garza1, Catherine L Reed2, Ralph J Roberts3.   

Abstract

Recent studies have documented that the hand's ability to perform actions affects the visual processing and attention for objects near the hand, suggesting that actions may have specific effects on visual orienting. However, most research on the relation between spatial attention and action focuses on actions as responses to visual attention manipulations. The current study examines visual attention immediately following an executed or imagined action. A modified spatial cuing paradigm tested whether a brief, lateralized hand-pinch performed by a visually hidden hand near the target location, facilitated or inhibited subsequent visual target detection. Conditions in which hand-pinches were fully executed (action) were compared to ones with no hand-pinch (inaction) in Experiment 1 and imagined pinches (imagine) in Experiment 2. Results from Experiment 1 indicated that performed hand pinches facilitated rather than inhibited subsequent detection responses to targets appearing near the pinch, but target detection was not affected by inaction. In Experiment 2, both action and imagined action conditions cued attention and facilitated responses, but along differing time courses. These results highlight the ongoing nature of visual attention and demonstrate how it is deployed to locations even following actions.

Keywords:  Action execution; Attention; Hand proximity effect; Imagined actions; Motor programming; Visual cuing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29959452     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5307-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives.

Authors:  Catherine L Reed
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

Review 2.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Attention affects visual perceptual processing near the hand.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-08-16

4.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Top-down influences mediate hand bias in spatial attention.

Authors:  John P Garza; Michael J Strom; Charles E Wright; Ralph J Roberts; Catherine L Reed
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space.

Authors:  Catherine L Reed; Ryan Betz; John P Garza; Ralph J Roberts
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate?

Authors:  J Decety
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1996-03

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Grasp posture alters visual processing biases near the hands.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-04-10

10.  EPS Mid-Career Award 2004: brain mechanisms of attention.

Authors:  John Duncan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  1 in total

1.  Visual attention around a hand location localized by proprioceptive information.

Authors:  Satoshi Shioiri; Takumi Sasada; Ryota Nishikawa
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2022-02-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.