Kevin Shiue1, Alberto Cerra-Franco1, Ronald Shapiro2, Neil Estabrook1, Edward M Mannina1, Christopher R Deig1, Sandra Althouse3, Sheng Liu4, Jun Wan4, Yong Zang5, Namita Agrawal1, Pericles Ioannides1, Yongmei Liu1, Chen Zhang6, Colleen DesRosiers1, Greg Bartlett1, Marvene Ewing1, Mark P Langer1, Gordon Watson1, Richard Zellars1, Feng-Ming Kong1, Tim Lautenschlaeger7. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Richard L. Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, Indiana. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. 4. Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Collaborative Core for Cancer Bioinformatics, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. 6. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: timlaut@iupui.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: It remains unclear if histology should be independently considered when choosing stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy dose prescriptions for NSCLC. METHODS: The study population included 508 patients with 561 lesions between 2000 and 2016, of which 442 patients with 482 lesions had complete dosimetric information. Eligible patients had histologically or clinically diagnosed early-stage NSCLC and were treated with 3 to 5 fractions. The primary endpoint was in-field tumor control censored by either death or progression. Involved lobe control was also assessed. RESULTS: At 6.7 years median follow-up, 3-year in-field control, involved lobe control, overall survival, and progression-free survival rates were 88.1%, 80.0%, 49.4%, and 37.2%, respectively. Gross tumor volume (GTV) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01 per mL, p = 0.0044) and histology (p = 0.0225) were independently associated with involved lobe failure. GTV (HR = 1.013, p = 0.001) and GTV dose (cutoff of 110 Gy, biologically effective dose with α/β = 10 [BED10], HR = 2.380, p = 0.0084) were independently associated with in-field failure. For squamous cell carcinomas, lower prescription doses were associated with worse in-field control (12 Gy × 4 or 10 Gy × 5 versus 18 Gy or 20 Gy × 3: HR = 3.530, p = 0.0447, confirmed by propensity score matching) and was independent of GTV (HR = 1.014 per mL, 95% confidence interval: 1.005-1.022, p = 0.0012). For adenocarcinomas, there were no differences in in-field control observed using the above dose groupings (p = 0.12 and p = 0.31, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of level I data, GTV and histology should be considered to personalize radiation dose for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy. We suggest lower prescription doses (i.e., 12 Gy × 4 or 10 G × 5) should be avoided for squamous cell carcinomas if normal tissue tolerances are met.
INTRODUCTION: It remains unclear if histology should be independently considered when choosing stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy dose prescriptions for NSCLC. METHODS: The study population included 508 patients with 561 lesions between 2000 and 2016, of which 442 patients with 482 lesions had complete dosimetric information. Eligible patients had histologically or clinically diagnosed early-stage NSCLC and were treated with 3 to 5 fractions. The primary endpoint was in-field tumor control censored by either death or progression. Involved lobe control was also assessed. RESULTS: At 6.7 years median follow-up, 3-year in-field control, involved lobe control, overall survival, and progression-free survival rates were 88.1%, 80.0%, 49.4%, and 37.2%, respectively. Gross tumor volume (GTV) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01 per mL, p = 0.0044) and histology (p = 0.0225) were independently associated with involved lobe failure. GTV (HR = 1.013, p = 0.001) and GTV dose (cutoff of 110 Gy, biologically effective dose with α/β = 10 [BED10], HR = 2.380, p = 0.0084) were independently associated with in-field failure. For squamous cell carcinomas, lower prescription doses were associated with worse in-field control (12 Gy × 4 or 10 Gy × 5 versus 18 Gy or 20 Gy × 3: HR = 3.530, p = 0.0447, confirmed by propensity score matching) and was independent of GTV (HR = 1.014 per mL, 95% confidence interval: 1.005-1.022, p = 0.0012). For adenocarcinomas, there were no differences in in-field control observed using the above dose groupings (p = 0.12 and p = 0.31, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of level I data, GTV and histology should be considered to personalize radiation dose for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy. We suggest lower prescription doses (i.e., 12 Gy × 4 or 10 G × 5) should be avoided for squamous cell carcinomas if normal tissue tolerances are met.
Authors: Alberto Cerra-Franco; Sheng Liu; Michella Azar; Kevin Shiue; Samantha Freije; Jason Hinton; Christopher R Deig; Donna Edwards; Neil C Estabrook; Susannah G Ellsworth; Ke Huang; Khalil Diab; Mark P Langer; Richard Zellars; Feng-Ming Kong; Jun Wan; Tim Lautenschlaeger Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2018-12-29 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Jingjing Kang; Matthew S Ning; Han Feng; Hongqi Li; Houda Bahig; Eric D Brooks; James W Welsh; Rui Ye; Hongyu Miao; Joe Y Chang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Gabriella Macchia; Roberta Lazzari; Nicoletta Colombo; Concetta Laliscia; Giovanni Capelli; Giuseppe Roberto D'Agostino; Francesco Deodato; Ernesto Maranzano; Edy Ippolito; Sara Ronchi; Fabiola Paiar; Marta Scorsetti; Savino Cilla; Rossana Ingargiola; Alessandra Huscher; Anna Maria Cerrotta; Andrei Fodor; Lisa Vicenzi; Donatella Russo; Simona Borghesi; Elisabetta Perrucci; Sandro Pignata; Cynthia Aristei; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Giovanni Scambia; Vincenzo Valentini; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Gabriella Ferrandina Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-10-10
Authors: Sai Duriseti; James Kavanaugh; Sreekrishna Goddu; Alex Price; Nels Knutson; Francisco Reynoso; Jeff Michalski; Sasa Mutic; Clifford Robinson; Matthew B Spraker Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-01-08
Authors: Michael Mix; Sean Tanny; Tamara Nsouli; Ryan Alden; Rishabh Chaudhari; Russell Kincaid; Paula F Rosenbaum; Jeffrey A Bogart; Paul Aridgides Journal: Lung Cancer (Auckl) Date: 2019-12-20
Authors: May Elbanna; Kevin Shiue; Donna Edwards; Alberto Cerra-Franco; Namita Agrawal; Jason Hinton; Todd Mereniuk; Christina Huang; Joshua L Ryan; Jessica Smith; Vasantha D Aaron; Heather Burney; Yong Zang; Jordan Holmes; Mark Langer; Richard Zellars; Tim Lautenschlaeger Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 4.785