Duaa Jabari1, V V Vedanarayanan2, Richard J Barohn3, Mazen M Dimachkie4. 1. Neuromuscular Division, Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mail Stop 2012, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. djabari@kumc.edu. 2. Neuromuscular Medicine, Mississippi Center for Advanced Medicine, 401 Baptist Dr. Suite 301, Madison, MS, 39210, USA. 3. Frontiers: University of Kansas Clinical & Translational Science Institute, University of Kansas Medical Center , 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Mail Stop 2012, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. 4. Neuromuscular Division, Department of Neurology and the Institute for Neurological Discoveries, The University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mail Stop 2012, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) is the most common acquired muscle disease after age 50, the pathogenesis of this disease is still poorly understood. In this review, we discuss our current state of knowledge in sIBM and provide an update on our current understanding of its pathophysiology and management. RECENT FINDINGS: Lines of evidence in support of an inflammatory pathogenesis include inflammatory infiltrates in the target organ, NFκB activation, cytokine response, MHC I upregulation, and cN1A antibody. Refractoriness to immunotherapies has led to suggestion of a degenerative pathophysiology. Evidence for impaired protein homeostasis with misfolding burden is coupled with findings of endoplasmic reticulum stress, proteasome dysfunction, and mitochondrial lesion. Recent treatment trials have focused more on correcting the degenerative process or muscle growth rather than controlling the inflammation. There has been growing evidence toward degeneration as the primary process in sIBM. This is consistent with the refractory nature of this disease. Improving our understanding of this disease pathogenesis will propel efforts to find an effective therapy.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) is the most common acquired muscle disease after age 50, the pathogenesis of this disease is still poorly understood. In this review, we discuss our current state of knowledge in sIBM and provide an update on our current understanding of its pathophysiology and management. RECENT FINDINGS: Lines of evidence in support of an inflammatory pathogenesis include inflammatory infiltrates in the target organ, NFκB activation, cytokine response, MHC I upregulation, and cN1A antibody. Refractoriness to immunotherapies has led to suggestion of a degenerative pathophysiology. Evidence for impaired protein homeostasis with misfolding burden is coupled with findings of endoplasmic reticulum stress, proteasome dysfunction, and mitochondrial lesion. Recent treatment trials have focused more on correcting the degenerative process or muscle growth rather than controlling the inflammation. There has been growing evidence toward degeneration as the primary process in sIBM. This is consistent with the refractory nature of this disease. Improving our understanding of this disease pathogenesis will propel efforts to find an effective therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical presentation; Diagnostic criteria; Inclusion body myositis; Pathogenesis; Treatment
Authors: Fieke M Cox; Maarten J Titulaer; Jacob K Sont; Axel R Wintzen; Jan J G M Verschuuren; Umesh A Badrising Journal: Brain Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: M Needham; I James; A Corbett; T Day; F Christiansen; B Phillips; F L Mastaglia Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: J B Lilleker; A Rietveld; S R Pye; K Mariampillai; O Benveniste; M T J Peeters; J A L Miller; M G Hanna; P M Machado; M J Parton; K R Gheorghe; U A Badrising; I E Lundberg; S Sacconi; M K Herbert; N J McHugh; B R F Lecky; C Brierley; D Hilton-Jones; J A Lamb; M E Roberts; R G Cooper; C G J Saris; G J M Pruijn; H Chinoy; B G M van Engelen Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Thomas E Lloyd; Iago Pinal-Fernandez; E Harlan Michelle; Lisa Christopher-Stine; Katherine Pak; Ned Sacktor; Andrew L Mammen Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Katarzyna Haczkiewicz; Agata Sebastian; Aleksandra Piotrowska; Maria Misterska-Skóra; Agnieszka Hałoń; Marta Skoczyńska; Maciej Sebastian; Piotr Wiland; Piotr Dzięgiel; Marzenna Podhorska-Okołów Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2018-12-08 Impact factor: 2.631