M C Arenas1, C I Navarro-Francés2, S Montagud-Romero2, J Miñarro2, C Manzanedo2. 1. Unidad de investigación Psicobiología de las Drogodependencias, Departamento de Psicobiología, Facultad de Psicología, Universitat de València, Avda. Blasco Ibañez, 21, 46010, Valencia, Spain. carmen.arenas@uv.es. 2. Unidad de investigación Psicobiología de las Drogodependencias, Departamento de Psicobiología, Facultad de Psicología, Universitat de València, Avda. Blasco Ibañez, 21, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex is a model of pre-attentional inhibitory function. The dopamine baseline in the nucleus accumbens plays a key role in PPI regulation as well as in the rewarding effects of cocaine. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive ability of PPI to identify the more vulnerable mice of both sexes to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine. METHODS: Male and female OF1 mice were first tested in the PPI paradigm to classify them as high or low PPI. Afterwards, they were evaluated in the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm induced by cocaine (1, 6 and 12 mg/kg). Moreover, the D1R and D2R protein expressions in the striatum of high and low PPI animals were analysed by Western blot. RESULTS: Only high-PPI mice acquired CPP induced by low doses of cocaine (1 and 6 mg/kg), while the low-PPI mice needed a higher dose of cocaine (12 mg/kg) to acquire the CPP, but once mice were conditioned, males did not extinguish the conditioned preference and females reinstated the preference with lower doses of cocaine than their control counterparts. Low-PPI animals, especially females, showed higher basal levels of D2R than those with a higher PPI. CONCLUSIONS: Low-PPI mice presented a lower sensitivity to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine, but once they were conditioned with a higher dose, they displayed a stronger, perseverant conditioned preference. The predictive capacity of PPI to detect the more vulnerable mice to the conditioned effects of cocaine is discussed.
RATIONALE: Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex is a model of pre-attentional inhibitory function. The dopamine baseline in the nucleus accumbens plays a key role in PPI regulation as well as in the rewarding effects of cocaine. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive ability of PPI to identify the more vulnerable mice of both sexes to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine. METHODS: Male and female OF1 mice were first tested in the PPI paradigm to classify them as high or low PPI. Afterwards, they were evaluated in the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm induced by cocaine (1, 6 and 12 mg/kg). Moreover, the D1R and D2R protein expressions in the striatum of high and low PPI animals were analysed by Western blot. RESULTS: Only high-PPI mice acquired CPP induced by low doses of cocaine (1 and 6 mg/kg), while the low-PPI mice needed a higher dose of cocaine (12 mg/kg) to acquire the CPP, but once mice were conditioned, males did not extinguish the conditioned preference and females reinstated the preference with lower doses of cocaine than their control counterparts. Low-PPI animals, especially females, showed higher basal levels of D2R than those with a higher PPI. CONCLUSIONS: Low-PPI mice presented a lower sensitivity to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine, but once they were conditioned with a higher dose, they displayed a stronger, perseverant conditioned preference. The predictive capacity of PPI to detect the more vulnerable mice to the conditioned effects of cocaine is discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cocaine; Conditioned place preference; Dopamine; Mice; Prepulse inhibition
Authors: Darlene D Francis; Kathleen Szegda; Gregory Campbell; W David Martin; Thomas R Insel Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Carmen Manzanedo; María P García-Pardo; Marta Rodríguez-Arias; José Miñarro; María A Aguilar Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2012-03-24 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: S Montagud-Romero; M D Reguilon; C Roger-Sanchez; M Pascual; M A Aguilar; C Guerri; J Miñarro; M Rodríguez-Arias Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Neal R Swerdlow; Martin Weber; Ying Qu; Gregory A Light; David L Braff Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2008-06-21 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Cathrin Rohleder; Dirk Wiedermann; Bernd Neumaier; Alexander Drzezga; Lars Timmermann; Rudolf Graf; F Markus Leweke; Heike Endepols Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Bernardo Stutz; Michael J Waterson; Matija Šestan-Peša; Marcelo O Dietrich; Mario Škarica; Nenad Sestan; Bence Racz; Aletta Magyar; Peter Sotonyi; Zhong-Wu Liu; Xiao-Bing Gao; Ferenc Matyas; Milan Stoiljkovic; Tamas L Horvath Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 13.437