INTRODUCTION: Under specific conditions, a weak lead stimulus, or "prepulse", can inhibit the startling effects of a subsequent intense abrupt stimulus. This startle-inhibiting effect of the prepulse, termed "prepulse inhibition" (PPI), is widely used in translational models to understand the biology of brainbased inhibitory mechanisms and their deficiency in neuropsychiatric disorders. In 1981, four published reports with "prepulse inhibition" as an index term were listed on Medline; over the past 5 years, new published Medline reports with "prepulse inhibition" as an index term have appeared at a rate exceeding once every 2.7 days (n=678). Most of these reports focus on the use of PPI in translational models of impaired sensorimotor gating in schizophrenia. This rapid expansion and broad application of PPI as a tool for understanding schizophrenia has, at times, outpaced critical thinking and falsifiable hypotheses about the relative strengths vs. limitations of this measure. OBJECTIVES: This review enumerates the realistic expectations for PPI in translational models for schizophrenia research, and provides cautionary notes for the future applications of this important research tool. CONCLUSION: In humans, PPI is not "diagnostic"; levels of PPI do not predict clinical course, specific symptoms, or individual medication responses. In preclinical studies, PPI is valuable for evaluating models or model organisms relevant to schizophrenia, "mapping" neural substrates of deficient PPI in schizophrenia, and advancing the discovery and development of novel therapeutics. Across species, PPI is a reliable, robust quantitative phenotype that is useful for probing the neurobiology and genetics of gating deficits in schizophrenia.
INTRODUCTION: Under specific conditions, a weak lead stimulus, or "prepulse", can inhibit the startling effects of a subsequent intense abrupt stimulus. This startle-inhibiting effect of the prepulse, termed "prepulse inhibition" (PPI), is widely used in translational models to understand the biology of brainbased inhibitory mechanisms and their deficiency in neuropsychiatric disorders. In 1981, four published reports with "prepulse inhibition" as an index term were listed on Medline; over the past 5 years, new published Medline reports with "prepulse inhibition" as an index term have appeared at a rate exceeding once every 2.7 days (n=678). Most of these reports focus on the use of PPI in translational models of impaired sensorimotor gating in schizophrenia. This rapid expansion and broad application of PPI as a tool for understanding schizophrenia has, at times, outpaced critical thinking and falsifiable hypotheses about the relative strengths vs. limitations of this measure. OBJECTIVES: This review enumerates the realistic expectations for PPI in translational models for schizophrenia research, and provides cautionary notes for the future applications of this important research tool. CONCLUSION: In humans, PPI is not "diagnostic"; levels of PPI do not predict clinical course, specific symptoms, or individual medication responses. In preclinical studies, PPI is valuable for evaluating models or model organisms relevant to schizophrenia, "mapping" neural substrates of deficient PPI in schizophrenia, and advancing the discovery and development of novel therapeutics. Across species, PPI is a reliable, robust quantitative phenotype that is useful for probing the neurobiology and genetics of gating deficits in schizophrenia.
Authors: Klaus Hoenig; Andrea Hochrein; Boris B Quednow; Wolfgang Maier; Michael Wagner Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-05-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Thomas J Gould; Scott P Bizily; Jan Tokarczyk; Michele P Kelly; Steven J Siegel; Stephen J Kanes; Ted Abel Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Rebecca L Ashare; Larry W Hawk; Keri Shiels; Jessica D Rhodes; William E Pelham; James G Waxmonsky Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Martin Weber; Wei-Li Chang; Michelle R Breier; Alex Yang; Mark J Millan; Neal R Swerdlow Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Jordy van Enkhuizen; Mark A Geyer; Arpi Minassian; William Perry; Brook L Henry; Jared W Young Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Francesca Managò; Maddalena Mereu; Surjeet Mastwal; Rosa Mastrogiacomo; Diego Scheggia; Marco Emanuele; Maria A De Luca; Daniel R Weinberger; Kuan Hong Wang; Francesco Papaleo Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 9.423