Literature DB >> 29955849

Application of net reclassification index to non-nested and point-based risk prediction models: a review.

Laine E Thomas1, Emily C O'Brien2, Jonathan P Piccini2, Ralph B D'Agostino3, Michael J Pencina1.   

Abstract

Much of medical risk prediction involves externally derived prediction equations, nomograms, and point-based risk scores. These settings are vulnerable to misleading findings of incremental value based on versions of the net reclassification index (NRI) in common use. By applying non-nested models and point-based risk scores in the setting of stroke risk prediction in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), we demonstrate current recommendations for presentation and interpretation of the NRI. We emphasize pitfalls that are likely to occur with point-based risk scores that are easy to neglect when statistical methodology is focused on continuous models. In order to make appropriate decisions about risk prediction and personalized medicine, physicians, researchers, and policy makers need to understand the strengths and limitations of the NRI. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2018. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Net reclassification index; Risk prediction; Risk scores

Year:  2019        PMID: 29955849      PMCID: PMC6568208          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  41 in total

Review 1.  Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Holly Janes; Gary Longton; Wendy Leisenring; Polly Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  B F Gage; A D Waterman; W Shannon; M Boechler; M W Rich; M J Radford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Clinical classification schemes for predicting hemorrhage: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (NRAF).

Authors:  Brian F Gage; Yan Yan; Paul E Milligan; Amy D Waterman; Robert Culverhouse; Michael W Rich; Martha J Radford
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Robert G Hart; Lesly A Pearce; Maria I Aguilar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Robby Nieuwlaat; Ron Pisters; Deirdre A Lane; Harry J G M Crijns
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: the role of reclassification measures.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Assessing the value of risk predictions by using risk stratification tables.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe; Wen Gu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Mark A Hlatky; Philip Greenland; Donna K Arnett; Christie M Ballantyne; Michael H Criqui; Mitchell S V Elkind; Alan S Go; Frank E Harrell; Yuling Hong; Barbara V Howard; Virginia J Howard; Priscilla Y Hsue; Christopher M Kramer; Joseph P McConnell; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Christopher J O'Donnell; Sidney C Smith; Peter W F Wilson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  13 in total

1.  Predicting the risk for major bleeding in elderly patients with venous thromboembolism using the Charlson index. Findings from the RIETE.

Authors:  Covadonga Gómez-Cuervo; Agustina Rivas; Adriana Visonà; Nuria Ruiz-Giménez; Ángeles Blanco-Molina; Inmaculada Cañas; José Portillo; Patricia López-Miguel; Katia Flores; Manuel Monreal
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Free Hemoglobin Ratio as a Novel Biomarker of Acute Kidney Injury After On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jie Hu; Emanuele Rezoagli; Francesco Zadek; Edward A Bittner; Chong Lei; Lorenzo Berra
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Incremental Prognostic Value of Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Thickness Measured Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Revascularization in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Yue Ma; Quanmei Ma; Xiaonan Wang; Tongtong Yu; Yuxue Dang; Jin Shang; Guangxiao Li; Yang Hou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-04

4.  Association of inflammatory markers with cerebral small vessel disease in community-based population.

Authors:  Lingling Jiang; Xueli Cai; Dongxiao Yao; Jing Jing; Lerong Mei; Yingying Yang; Shan Li; Aoming Jin; Xia Meng; Hao Li; Tiemin Wei; Yongjun Wang; Yuesong Pan; Yilong Wang
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 9.587

5.  Prediction of Cardiovascular Events by Type I Central Systolic Blood Pressure: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Florence Lamarche; Mohsen Agharazii; François Madore; Rémi Goupil
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Key Experimental Factors of Machine Learning-Based Identification of Surgery Cancellations.

Authors:  Fengyi Zhang; Xinyuan Cui; Renrong Gong; Chuan Zhang; Zhigao Liao
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.682

7.  HFA-PEFF scores: prognostic value in heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Koichi Egashira; Daisuke Sueta; Takashi Komorita; Eiichiro Yamamoto; Hiroki Usuku; Takanori Tokitsu; Koichiro Fujisue; Taiki Nishihara; Fumi Oike; Masafumi Takae; Shinsuke Hanatani; Seiji Takashio; Miwa Ito; Kenshi Yamanaga; Satoshi Araki; Hirofumi Soejima; Koichi Kaikita; Kenichi Matsushita; Kenichi Tsujita
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.884

8.  Construction of a risk assessment model of cardiovascular disease in a rural Chinese hypertensive population based on lasso-Cox analysis.

Authors:  Nanxiang Ouyang; Guangxiao Li; Chang Wang; Yingxian Sun
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.885

9.  GARFIELD-AF model for prediction of stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation: a Danish nationwide validation study.

Authors:  Frederik Dalgaard; Karen Pieper; Freek Verheugt; A John Camm; Keith Aa Fox; Ajay K Kakkar; Jannik L Pallisgaard; Peter V Rasmussen; Henk van Weert; Tommi Bo Lindhardt; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Gunnar H Gislason; Martin H Ruwald; Ralf E Harskamp
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Nomograms predicting long-term survival in patients with invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: A population-based study.

Authors:  Jia-Yuan Wu; Yu-Feng Wang; Huan Ma; Sha-Sha Li; Hui-Lai Miao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.