| Literature DB >> 29954378 |
Ana Respicio1,2, Margarida Moz3, Margarida Vaz Pato3, Rute Somensi4, Cecília Dias Flores5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approaches to nurse staffing are commonly concerned with determining the minimum number of care hours according to the illness severity of patients. However, there is a gap in the literature considering multi-skill and multi-shift nurse staffing. This study addresses nurse staffing per skill category, at a strategical decision level, by considering the organization of work in shifts and coping with variability in demand.Entities:
Keywords: Decision support; Multi-skill staffing; Nurse staffing; Shift work; Spreadsheet staffing model
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29954378 PMCID: PMC6025742 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0638-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ISSN: 1472-6947 Impact factor: 2.796
Fig. 1Staffing method
Fig. 2Data used for model application
Fig. 3Data and model results for Hospital São José, unit “In. U 4th floor PRT/CNV”
Impact of changes in parameters
| parameters | staff level for nurses | staff level for technicians | total staff | total cost | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| min. staff | balance | morning | afternoon | night 1 | night 2 | total | mor-ning | afternoon | night 1 | night 2 | total | ||
| 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 23 | 138.0 |
| 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 23 | 138.0 |
| 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 23 | 138.0 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 23 | 171.6 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 23 | 171.6 |
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 23 | 171.6 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 24 | 216.0 |
| 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 24 | 216.0 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 24 | 216.0 |
Real data and model results for Hospital São José, in unit “In. U 4th floor PRT/CNV”
| date | weekday | data | results of | |||||||||
| number of patients by illness severity level | care hours COFEN | minimum ratio nurses/workers COFEN (%) | ||||||||||
| total | minimal | intermediary | semi-intensive | intensive | ||||||||
| 07–09-2016 | Wednesday | 34 | 21 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 164.0 | 35 | ||||
| 08–09-2016 | Thursday | 25 | 15 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 120.6 | 34 | ||||
| 09–09-2016 | Friday | 26 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 124.4 | 34 | ||||
| 10–09-2016 | Saturday | 21 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 98.0 | 34 | ||||
| 11–09-2016 | Sunday | 23 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 109.4 | 35 | ||||
| 12–09-2016 | Monday | 25 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 113.2 | 34 | ||||
| 13–09-2016 | Tuesday | 34 | 24 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 154.8 | 34 | ||||
| 14–09-2016 | Wednesday | 35 | 22 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 164.0 | 34 | ||||
| staff levels | ||||||||||||
| date | results of | real situation | ||||||||||
| number of nurses per shift | number of technicians per shift | number of nurses | number of technicians | number of nurses | number of technicians | |||||||
| morning | afternoon | night 1 | night 2 | morning | afternoon | night 1 | night 2 | |||||
| 07–09-2016 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 17 | 4 | 22 |
| 08–09-2016 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 13 | 4 | 22 |
| 09–09-2016 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 13 | 4 | 22 |
| 10–09-2016 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 22 |
| 11–09-2016 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 11 | 4 | 22 |
| 12–09-2016 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 4 | 22 |
| 13–09-2016 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 16 | 4 | 22 |
| 14–09-2016 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 17 | 4 | 22 |