Spyridon Siafis1, Georgios Papazisis1. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Abstract
AIMS: Recent data suggest that antidepressants are associated with incident diabetes but the possible pharmacological mechanism is still questioned. The aim of the present study was to evaluate antidepressant's risk for reporting diabetes using disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse events spontaneous reporting system (FAERS) database and to investigate possible receptor/transporter mechanisms involved. METHODS: Data from 2004 to 2017 were analysed using OpenVigil2 and adjusted reporting odds ratio (aROR) for reporting diabetes was calculated for 22 antidepressants. Events included in the narrow scope of the SMQ 'hyperglycaemia/new-onset diabetes mellitus' were defined as cases and all the other events as non-cases. The pharmacodynamic profile was extracted using the PDSP and IUPHAR/BPS databases and the occupancy on receptors (serotonin, alpha adrenoreceptors, dopamine, muscarinic, histamine) and transporters (SERT, NET, DAT) was estimated. The relationship between aROR for diabetes and receptor occupancy was investigated with Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and univariate linear regression. RESULTS: Six antidepressants were associated with diabetes: nortriptyline with aROR [95% CI] of 2.01 [1.41-2.87], doxepin 1.97 [1.31-2.97], imipramine 1.82 [1.09-3.06], sertraline 1.47 [1.29-1.68], mirtazapine 1.33 [1.04-1.69] and amitriptyline 1.31 [1.09-1.59]. Strong positive correlation coefficients between occupancy and aROR for diabetes were identified for the receptors M1 , M3 , M4 , M5 and H1 . CONCLUSION: Most of the tricyclic antidepressants, mirtazapine and sertraline seem to be associated with reporting diabetes in FAERS. Higher degrees of occupancy on muscarinic receptors and H1 may be a plausible pharmacological mechanism. Further clinical assessment and pharmacovigilance data is needed to validate this potential safety signal.
AIMS: Recent data suggest that antidepressants are associated with incident diabetes but the possible pharmacological mechanism is still questioned. The aim of the present study was to evaluate antidepressant's risk for reporting diabetes using disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse events spontaneous reporting system (FAERS) database and to investigate possible receptor/transporter mechanisms involved. METHODS: Data from 2004 to 2017 were analysed using OpenVigil2 and adjusted reporting odds ratio (aROR) for reporting diabetes was calculated for 22 antidepressants. Events included in the narrow scope of the SMQ 'hyperglycaemia/new-onset diabetes mellitus' were defined as cases and all the other events as non-cases. The pharmacodynamic profile was extracted using the PDSP and IUPHAR/BPS databases and the occupancy on receptors (serotonin, alpha adrenoreceptors, dopamine, muscarinic, histamine) and transporters (SERT, NET, DAT) was estimated. The relationship between aROR for diabetes and receptor occupancy was investigated with Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and univariate linear regression. RESULTS: Six antidepressants were associated with diabetes: nortriptyline with aROR [95% CI] of 2.01 [1.41-2.87], doxepin 1.97 [1.31-2.97], imipramine 1.82 [1.09-3.06], sertraline 1.47 [1.29-1.68], mirtazapine 1.33 [1.04-1.69] and amitriptyline 1.31 [1.09-1.59]. Strong positive correlation coefficients between occupancy and aROR for diabetes were identified for the receptors M1 , M3 , M4 , M5 and H1 . CONCLUSION: Most of the tricyclic antidepressants, mirtazapine and sertraline seem to be associated with reporting diabetes in FAERS. Higher degrees of occupancy on muscarinic receptors and H1 may be a plausible pharmacological mechanism. Further clinical assessment and pharmacovigilance data is needed to validate this potential safety signal.
Authors: Miguel-Angel Maciá-Martínez; Francisco J de Abajo; Gilly Roberts; Jim Slattery; Bharat Thakrar; Antoni F Z Wisniewski Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: P J Lustman; L S Griffith; R E Clouse; K E Freedland; S A Eisen; E H Rubin; R M Carney; J B McGill Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 1997 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Arthur Christopoulos; Anthony P Davenport; Eamonn Kelly; Neil V Marrion; John A Peters; Elena Faccenda; Simon D Harding; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Simon D Harding; Joanna L Sharman; Elena Faccenda; Chris Southan; Adam J Pawson; Sam Ireland; Alasdair J G Gray; Liam Bruce; Stephen P H Alexander; Stephen Anderton; Clare Bryant; Anthony P Davenport; Christian Doerig; Doriano Fabbro; Francesca Levi-Schaffer; Michael Spedding; Jamie A Davies Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Hieronymus J Derijks; Ronald H B Meyboom; Eibert R Heerdink; Fred H P De Koning; Rob Janknegt; Marie Lindquist; Antoine C G Egberts Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Paige D Wartko; Noel S Weiss; Daniel A Enquobahrie; K C Gary Chan; Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Beth A Mueller; Sascha Dublin Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2019-07-12 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Simon D Harding; Jane F Armstrong; Elena Faccenda; Christopher Southan; Stephen P H Alexander; Anthony P Davenport; Adam J Pawson; Michael Spedding; Jamie A Davies Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Theodoros G Soldatos; Sarah Kim; Stephan Schmidt; Lawrence J Lesko; David B Jackson Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2022-02-20
Authors: Sue Jordan; Timothy Banner; Marie Gabe-Walters; Jane M Mikhail; Gerwyn Panes; Jeff Round; Sherrill Snelgrove; Mel Storey; David Hughes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-09-11 Impact factor: 3.240