OBJECTIVE: As the burden of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) rises across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), global donors and governments are exploring strategies to integrate HIV and NCD care. Implementation science is an emerging research paradigm that can help such programs achieve health impact at scale. We define implementation science as a systematic, scientific approach to ask and answer questions about how to deliver what works in populations who need it with greater speed, appropriate fidelity, efficiency, and relevant coverage. We identified achievements and gaps in the application of implementation science to HIV/NCD integration, developed an HIV/NCD implementation science research agenda, and detailed opportunities for capacity building and training. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of the application of implementation science methods to integrated HIV/NCD programs in SSA. METHODS: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE for evaluations of integrated programs in SSA reporting at least one implementation outcome. RESULTS: We identified 31 eligible studies. We found that most studies used only qualitative, economic, or impact evaluation methods. Only one study used a theoretical framework for implementation science. Acceptability, feasibility, and penetration were the most frequently reported implementation outcomes. Adoption, appropriateness, cost, and fidelity were rare; sustainability was not evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation science has a promising role in supporting HIV/NCD integration, although its impact will be limited unless theoretical frameworks, rigorous study designs, and reliable measures are employed. To help support use of implementation science, we need to build sustainable implementation science capacity. Doing so in SSA and supporting implementation science investigators can help expedite HIV/NCD integration.
OBJECTIVE: As the burden of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) rises across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), global donors and governments are exploring strategies to integrate HIV and NCD care. Implementation science is an emerging research paradigm that can help such programs achieve health impact at scale. We define implementation science as a systematic, scientific approach to ask and answer questions about how to deliver what works in populations who need it with greater speed, appropriate fidelity, efficiency, and relevant coverage. We identified achievements and gaps in the application of implementation science to HIV/NCD integration, developed an HIV/NCD implementation science research agenda, and detailed opportunities for capacity building and training. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of the application of implementation science methods to integrated HIV/NCD programs in SSA. METHODS: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE for evaluations of integrated programs in SSA reporting at least one implementation outcome. RESULTS: We identified 31 eligible studies. We found that most studies used only qualitative, economic, or impact evaluation methods. Only one study used a theoretical framework for implementation science. Acceptability, feasibility, and penetration were the most frequently reported implementation outcomes. Adoption, appropriateness, cost, and fidelity were rare; sustainability was not evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation science has a promising role in supporting HIV/NCD integration, although its impact will be limited unless theoretical frameworks, rigorous study designs, and reliable measures are employed. To help support use of implementation science, we need to build sustainable implementation science capacity. Doing so in SSA and supporting implementation science investigators can help expedite HIV/NCD integration.
Authors: Susan Vorkoper; Linda E Kupfer; Nalini Anand; Pragna Patel; Blythe Beecroft; William M Tierney; Robert Ferris; Wafaa M El-Sadr Journal: AIDS Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Benson Njuguna; Susan Vorkoper; Pragna Patel; Mike J A Reid; Rajesh Vedanthan; Colin Pfaff; Paul H Park; Lydia Fischer; Jeremiah Laktabai; Sonak D Pastakia Journal: AIDS Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Tamsin K Phillips; Kemberlee Bonnet; Landon Myer; Sizakele Buthelezi; Zanele Rini; Jean Bassett; David Schlundt; Kate Clouse Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2019-09
Authors: McKenna C Eastment; George Wanje; Barbra A Richardson; Emily Mwaringa; Kenneth Sherr; Ruanne V Barnabas; Martha Perla; Kishorchandra Mandaliya; Walter Jaoko; R Scott McClelland Journal: AIDS Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Christopher G Kemp; Brooke A Jarrett; Churl-Su Kwon; Lanxin Song; Nathalie Jetté; Jaime C Sapag; Judith Bass; Laura Murray; Deepa Rao; Stefan Baral Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Kaku So-Armah; Laura A Benjamin; Gerald S Bloomfield; Matthew J Feinstein; Priscilla Hsue; Benson Njuguna; Matthew S Freiberg Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 16.070
Authors: David Sando; Alexander Kintu; Samson Okello; Peter Chris Kawungezi; David Guwatudde; Gerald Mutungi; Winnie Muyindike; Nicolas A Menzies; Goodarz Danaei; Stéphane Verguet Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 6.707