McKenna C Eastment1, George Wanje2, Barbra A Richardson2,3,4, Emily Mwaringa5, Kenneth Sherr2, Ruanne V Barnabas1,2,6, Martha Perla2, Kishorchandra Mandaliya2, Walter Jaoko7, R Scott McClelland1,2,6,7. 1. Department of Medicine. 2. Department of Global Health. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle. 4. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Seattle Washington, USA. 5. Mombasa County Department of Health, Mombasa, Kenya. 6. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7. University of Nairobi, Medical Microbiology, Nairobi, Kenya.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test an implementation strategy, the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA), to increase rates of HIV testing and counseling (HTC) in family planning clinics in Mombasa, Kenya. DESIGN: A cluster randomized trial. METHODS: Twenty-four family planning clinics were randomized 1 : 1 to implementing SAIA versus usual procedures. Study staff implemented monthly SAIA cycles with family planning clinic staff for 12 months. SAIA has five steps. Step 1 uses a "cascade analysis' tool to quantify the number of individuals who complete each step of a process. Step 2 involves sequential process flow mapping to identify modifiable bottlenecks in the system. Step 3 develops and implements workflow modifications to address bottlenecks. Step 4 assesses impact of the modification by recalculating the cascade analysis. Step 5 repeats the cycle. The primary outcome was the proportion of new family planning clients tested for HIV during the last quarter of the trial. RESULTS: During the last 3 months of the trial, 85% (740/868) of new family planning clients were counseled for HIV in intervention clinics compared with 67% (1036/1542) in control clinics (prevalence rate ratio [PRR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.30). Forty-two percent (364/859) of family planning clients were tested for HIV at intervention clinics compared with 32% (485/1521) at control clinics (PRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16-1.52). CONCLUSION: SAIA led to a significant increase in HIV testing in family planning clinics in Mombasa. Integrating routine HTC into family planning clinics is a promising strategy to achieve the UNAIDS goal of 95% of people living with HIV being aware of their status.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test an implementation strategy, the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA), to increase rates of HIV testing and counseling (HTC) in family planning clinics in Mombasa, Kenya. DESIGN: A cluster randomized trial. METHODS: Twenty-four family planning clinics were randomized 1 : 1 to implementing SAIA versus usual procedures. Study staff implemented monthly SAIA cycles with family planning clinic staff for 12 months. SAIA has five steps. Step 1 uses a "cascade analysis' tool to quantify the number of individuals who complete each step of a process. Step 2 involves sequential process flow mapping to identify modifiable bottlenecks in the system. Step 3 develops and implements workflow modifications to address bottlenecks. Step 4 assesses impact of the modification by recalculating the cascade analysis. Step 5 repeats the cycle. The primary outcome was the proportion of new family planning clients tested for HIV during the last quarter of the trial. RESULTS: During the last 3 months of the trial, 85% (740/868) of new family planning clients were counseled for HIV in intervention clinics compared with 67% (1036/1542) in control clinics (prevalence rate ratio [PRR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.30). Forty-two percent (364/859) of family planning clients were tested for HIV at intervention clinics compared with 32% (485/1521) at control clinics (PRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16-1.52). CONCLUSION: SAIA led to a significant increase in HIV testing in family planning clinics in Mombasa. Integrating routine HTC into family planning clinics is a promising strategy to achieve the UNAIDS goal of 95% of people living with HIV being aware of their status.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Katrin E Fabian; Alberto Muanido; Vasco F J Cumbe; Nelia Manaca; Leecreesha Hicks; Bryan J Weiner; Kenneth Sherr; Bradley H Wagenaar Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Marianne E Zotti; Johanna Pringle; Gary Stuart; William A Boyd; Dabo Brantley; Lori de Ravello Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2010 Nov-Dec
Authors: Sarah Gimbel; Joachim Voss; Mary Anne Mercer; Brenda Zierler; Stephen Gloyd; Maria de Joana Coutinho; Florencia Floriano; Maria de Fatima Cuembelo; Jennifer Einberg; Kenneth Sherr Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2014-10-21
Authors: McKenna C Eastment; Jessica E Long; George Wanje; Barbra A Richardson; Emily Mwaringa; Kenneth Sherr; Ruanne V Barnabas; Kishorchandra Mandaliya; Walter Jaoko; R Scott McClelland Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2022-09-08
Authors: Jessica E Long; McKenna C Eastment; George Wanje; Barbra A Richardson; Emily Mwaringa; Mwanakarama Athman Mohamed; Kenneth Sherr; Ruanne V Barnabas; Kishorchandra Mandaliya; Walter Jaoko; R Scott McClelland Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 7.960