James J S Norton1, Jessica Mullins, Birgit E Alitz, Timothy Bretl. 1. National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, PO Box 22002, Albany, NY 12201, United States of America. Department of Neurology, Stratton VA Medical Center, 113 Holland Ave, Albany, NY 12208, United States of America. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, 306 N Wright St, Urbana, IL 61801, United States of America.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we report the performance of 9-11-year-old children using a steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) and provide control data collected from adults for comparison. Children in our study achieved a much higher performance (79% accuracy; average age 9.64 years old) than the only previous investigation of children using an SSVEP-based BCI (∼50% accuracy; average age 9.86 years old). APPROACH: Experiments were conducted in two phases, a short calibration phase and a longer experimental phase. An offline analysis of the data collected during the calibration phase was used to set two parameters for a classifier and to screen participants who did not achieve a minimum accuracy of 85%. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven of the 14 children and all 11 of the adults who completed the calibration phase met the minimum accuracy requirement. During the experimental phase, children selected targets with a similar accuracy (79% for children versus 78% for adults), latency (2.1 s for children versus 1.9 s for adults), and bitrate (0.50 bits s-1 for children and 0.56 bits s-1 for adults) as adults. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that children can use an SSVEP-based BCI with higher performance than previously believed and is the first to report the performance of children using an SSVEP-based BCI in terms of latency and bitrate. The results of this study imply that children with severe motor disabilities (such as locked-in syndrome) may use an SSVEP-based BCI to restore/replace the ability to communicate.
OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we report the performance of 9-11-year-old children using a steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) and provide control data collected from adults for comparison. Children in our study achieved a much higher performance (79% accuracy; average age 9.64 years old) than the only previous investigation of children using an SSVEP-based BCI (∼50% accuracy; average age 9.86 years old). APPROACH: Experiments were conducted in two phases, a short calibration phase and a longer experimental phase. An offline analysis of the data collected during the calibration phase was used to set two parameters for a classifier and to screen participants who did not achieve a minimum accuracy of 85%. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven of the 14 children and all 11 of the adults who completed the calibration phase met the minimum accuracy requirement. During the experimental phase, children selected targets with a similar accuracy (79% for children versus 78% for adults), latency (2.1 s for children versus 1.9 s for adults), and bitrate (0.50 bits s-1 for children and 0.56 bits s-1 for adults) as adults. SIGNIFICANCE: This study shows that children can use an SSVEP-based BCI with higher performance than previously believed and is the first to report the performance of children using an SSVEP-based BCI in terms of latency and bitrate. The results of this study imply that children with severe motor disabilities (such as locked-in syndrome) may use an SSVEP-based BCI to restore/replace the ability to communicate.
Authors: Gerwin Schalk; Dennis J McFarland; Thilo Hinterberger; Niels Birbaumer; Jonathan R Wolpaw Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: A Kübler; F Nijboer; J Mellinger; T M Vaughan; H Pawelzik; G Schalk; D J McFarland; N Birbaumer; J R Wolpaw Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-05-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: James J S Norton; Grace F DiRisio; Jonathan S Carp; Amanda E Norton; Nicholas S Kochan; Jonathan R Wolpaw Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Georgii A Illarionov; Denis S Kolchanov; Oleg A Kuchur; Mikhail V Zhukov; Ekaterina Sergeeva; Vladimir V Krishtop; Alexandr V Vinogradov; Maxim I Morozov Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2019-11-05 Impact factor: 4.036
Authors: Eli Kinney-Lang; Dion Kelly; Erica D Floreani; Zeanna Jadavji; Danette Rowley; Ephrem Takele Zewdie; Javad R Anaraki; Hosein Bahari; Kim Beckers; Karen Castelane; Lindsey Crawford; Sarah House; Chelsea A Rauh; Amber Michaud; Matheus Mussi; Jessica Silver; Corinne Tuck; Kim Adams; John Andersen; Tom Chau; Adam Kirton Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 3.169