Literature DB >> 29952624

Refining the law of practice.

Nathan J Evans1, Scott D Brown2, Douglas J K Mewhort3, Andrew Heathcote4.   

Abstract

The "law of practice"-a simple nonlinear function describing the relationship between mean response time (RT) and practice-has provided a practically and theoretically useful way of quantifying the speed-up that characterizes skill acquisition. Early work favored a power law, but this was shown to be an artifact of biases caused by averaging over participants who are individually better described by an exponential law. However, both power and exponential functions make the strong assumption that the speedup always proceeds at a steadily decreasing rate, even though there are sometimes clear exceptions. We propose a new law that can both accommodate an initial delay resulting in a slower-faster-slower rate of learning, with either power or exponential forms as limiting cases, and which can account for not only mean RT but also the effect of practice on the entire distribution of RT. We evaluate this proposal with data from a broad array of tasks using hierarchical Bayesian modeling, which pools data across participants while minimizing averaging artifacts, and using inference procedures that take into account differences in flexibility among laws. In a clear majority of paradigms our results supported a delayed exponential law. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29952624     DOI: 10.1037/rev0000105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  7 in total

1.  Response-time data provide critical constraints on dynamic models of multi-alternative, multi-attribute choice.

Authors:  Nathan J Evans; William R Holmes; Jennifer S Trueblood
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

2.  Inferring latent learning factors in large-scale cognitive training data.

Authors:  Mark Steyvers; Robert J Schafer
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-08-31

3.  A Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects location scale model for learning.

Authors:  Donald R Williams; Daniel R Zimprich; Philippe Rast
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-10

4.  A new model of decision processing in instrumental learning tasks.

Authors:  Steven Miletić; Russell J Boag; Anne C Trutti; Niek Stevenson; Birte U Forstmann; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  A method, framework, and tutorial for efficiently simulating models of decision-making.

Authors:  Nathan J Evans
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-10

6.  Lecture recording, microlearning, video conferences and LT-platform - medical education during COVID-19 crisis at the Medical University of Graz.

Authors:  Josef Smolle; Andreas Rössler; Herwig Rehatschek; Florian Hye; Sabine Vogl
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-28

7.  Comparing models of learning and relearning in large-scale cognitive training data sets.

Authors:  Aakriti Kumar; Aaron S Benjamin; Andrew Heathcote; Mark Steyvers
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2022-10-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.