PURPOSE: An association between mutational burden and response to immune checkpoint therapy has been documented in several cancer types. The potential for such a mutational burden threshold to predict response to immune checkpoint therapy was evaluated in several clinical datasets, where mutational burden was measured either by whole-exome sequencing (WXS) or using commercially available sequencing panels. METHODS: WXS and RNA-seq data of 33 solid cancer types from TCGA were analyzed to determine whether a robust immune checkpoint activating mutation (iCAM) burden threshold associated with evidence of immune checkpoint activation exists in these cancers that may serve as a biomarker for response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. RESULTS: We find that a robust iCAM threshold, associated with signatures of immune checkpoint activation, exists in 8 of 33 solid cancers: melanoma, lung adenocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, endometrial cancer, stomach adenocarcinoma, cervical cancer, ER+HER2- breast cancer, and bladder-urothelial cancer. Tumors with mutational burden higher than the threshold (iCAM+) also had clear histologic evidence of lymphocytic infiltration. In published datasets of melanoma, lung adenocarcinoma and colon cancer, patients with iCAM+ tumors had significantly better response to immune checkpoint therapy compared to those with iCAM- tumors. ROC analysis using TCGA predictions as gold standard showed that iCAM+ tumors are accurately identifiable using clinical sequencing assays, such as FoundationOne or StrandAdvantage. Using the FoundationOne derived threshold, analysis of 113 melanoma tumors, showed that iCAM+ patients have significantly better response to immune checkpoint therapy. iCAM+ and iCAM- tumors have distinct mutation patterns and different immune microenvironments. CONCLUSION: In 8 solid cancers, a mutational burden threshold exists that may predict response to immune checkpoint blockade. This threshold is identifiable using available clinical sequencing assays.
PURPOSE: An association between mutational burden and response to immune checkpoint therapy has been documented in several cancer types. The potential for such a mutational burden threshold to predict response to immune checkpoint therapy was evaluated in several clinical datasets, where mutational burden was measured either by whole-exome sequencing (WXS) or using commercially available sequencing panels. METHODS: WXS and RNA-seq data of 33 solid cancer types from TCGA were analyzed to determine whether a robust immune checkpoint activating mutation (iCAM) burden threshold associated with evidence of immune checkpoint activation exists in these cancers that may serve as a biomarker for response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. RESULTS: We find that a robust iCAM threshold, associated with signatures of immune checkpoint activation, exists in 8 of 33 solid cancers: melanoma, lung adenocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, endometrial cancer, stomach adenocarcinoma, cervical cancer, ER+HER2- breast cancer, and bladder-urothelial cancer. Tumors with mutational burden higher than the threshold (iCAM+) also had clear histologic evidence of lymphocytic infiltration. In published datasets of melanoma, lung adenocarcinoma and colon cancer, patients with iCAM+ tumors had significantly better response to immune checkpoint therapy compared to those with iCAM- tumors. ROC analysis using TCGA predictions as gold standard showed that iCAM+ tumors are accurately identifiable using clinical sequencing assays, such as FoundationOne or StrandAdvantage. Using the FoundationOne derived threshold, analysis of 113 melanoma tumors, showed that iCAM+ patients have significantly better response to immune checkpoint therapy. iCAM+ and iCAM- tumors have distinct mutation patterns and different immune microenvironments. CONCLUSION: In 8 solid cancers, a mutational burden threshold exists that may predict response to immune checkpoint blockade. This threshold is identifiable using available clinical sequencing assays.
Authors: Katherine B Chiappinelli; Pamela L Strissel; Alexis Desrichard; Huili Li; Christine Henke; Benjamin Akman; Alexander Hein; Neal S Rote; Leslie M Cope; Alexandra Snyder; Vladimir Makarov; Sadna Budhu; Sadna Buhu; Dennis J Slamon; Jedd D Wolchok; Drew M Pardoll; Matthias W Beckmann; Cynthia A Zahnow; Taha Merghoub; Taha Mergoub; Timothy A Chan; Stephen B Baylin; Reiner Strick Journal: Cell Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Alexander C Huang; Michael A Postow; Robert J Orlowski; Rosemarie Mick; Bertram Bengsch; Sasikanth Manne; Wei Xu; Shannon Harmon; Josephine R Giles; Brandon Wenz; Matthew Adamow; Deborah Kuk; Katherine S Panageas; Cristina Carrera; Phillip Wong; Felix Quagliarello; Bradley Wubbenhorst; Kurt D'Andrea; Kristen E Pauken; Ramin S Herati; Ryan P Staupe; Jason M Schenkel; Suzanne McGettigan; Shawn Kothari; Sangeeth M George; Robert H Vonderheide; Ravi K Amaravadi; Giorgos C Karakousis; Lynn M Schuchter; Xiaowei Xu; Katherine L Nathanson; Jedd D Wolchok; Tara C Gangadhar; E John Wherry Journal: Nature Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan Journal: Science Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Tom Powles; Michiel S van der Heijden; Arjun V Balar; Andrea Necchi; Nancy Dawson; Peter H O'Donnell; Ani Balmanoukian; Yohann Loriot; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Petros Grivas; Richard W Joseph; Matthew D Galsky; Mark T Fleming; Daniel P Petrylak; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Howard A Burris; Daniel Castellano; Christina Canil; Joaquim Bellmunt; Dean Bajorin; Dorothee Nickles; Richard Bourgon; Garrett M Frampton; Na Cui; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Oyewale Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Robert Dreicer Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Paul T Nghiem; Shailender Bhatia; Evan J Lipson; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Natalie J Miller; Lakshmanan Annamalai; Sneha Berry; Elliot K Chartash; Adil Daud; Steven P Fling; Philip A Friedlander; Harriet M Kluger; Holbrook E Kohrt; Lisa Lundgren; Kim Margolin; Alan Mitchell; Thomas Olencki; Drew M Pardoll; Sunil A Reddy; Erica M Shantha; William H Sharfman; Elad Sharon; Lynn R Shemanski; Michi M Shinohara; Joel C Sunshine; Janis M Taube; John A Thompson; Steven M Townson; Jennifer H Yearley; Suzanne L Topalian; Martin A Cheever Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kosuke Yoshihara; Maria Shahmoradgoli; Emmanuel Martínez; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Hoon Kim; Wandaliz Torres-Garcia; Victor Treviño; Hui Shen; Peter W Laird; Douglas A Levine; Scott L Carter; Gad Getz; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Gordon B Mills; Roel G W Verhaak Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Paul C Tumeh; Christina L Harview; Jennifer H Yearley; I Peter Shintaku; Emma J M Taylor; Lidia Robert; Bartosz Chmielowski; Marko Spasic; Gina Henry; Voicu Ciobanu; Alisha N West; Manuel Carmona; Christine Kivork; Elizabeth Seja; Grace Cherry; Antonio J Gutierrez; Tristan R Grogan; Christine Mateus; Gorana Tomasic; John A Glaspy; Ryan O Emerson; Harlan Robins; Robert H Pierce; David A Elashoff; Caroline Robert; Antoni Ribas Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Anshuman Panda; Aguirre A de Cubas; Mark Stein; Gregory Riedlinger; Joshua Kra; Tina Mayer; Christof C Smith; Benjamin G Vincent; Jonathan S Serody; Kathryn E Beckermann; Shridar Ganesan; Gyan Bhanot; W Kimryn Rathmell Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-08-23
Authors: Jong Yeob Kim; Andreas Kronbichler; Michael Eisenhut; Sung Hwi Hong; Hans J van der Vliet; Jeonghyun Kang; Jae Il Shin; Gabriele Gamerith Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Hans-Georg Rammensee; Karl-Heinz Wiesmüller; P Anoop Chandran; Henning Zelba; Elisa Rusch; Cécile Gouttefangeas; Daniel J Kowalewski; Moreno Di Marco; Sebastian P Haen; Juliane S Walz; Yamel Cardona Gloria; Johanna Bödder; Jill-Marie Schertel; Antje Tunger; Luise Müller; Maximilian Kießler; Rebekka Wehner; Marc Schmitz; Meike Jakobi; Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra; Reinhild Klein; Karoline Laske; Kerstin Artzner; Linus Backert; Heiko Schuster; Johannes Schwenck; Alexander N R Weber; Bernd J Pichler; Manfred Kneilling; Christian la Fougère; Stephan Forchhammer; Gisela Metzler; Jürgen Bauer; Benjamin Weide; Wilfried Schippert; Stefan Stevanović; Markus W Löffler Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Tess O'Meara; Michal Marczyk; Tao Qing; Vesal Yaghoobi; Kim Blenman; Kimberly Cole; Vasiliki Pelekanou; David L Rimm; Lajos Pusztai Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2020-06-26