Literature DB >> 29951512

Untangling the bilateral versus single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting debate.

Emile Voisine1, Pierre Voisine1.   

Abstract

Year:  2018        PMID： 29951512      PMCID： PMC5994513          DOI： 10.21037/atm.2018.03.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN： 2305-5839


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one.

Authors:  B W Lytle; E H Blackstone; F D Loop; P L Houghtaling; J H Arnold; R Akhrass; P M McCarthy; D M Cosgrove
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Does Use of Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafting Reduce Long-Term Risk of Repeat Coronary Revascularization? A Multicenter Analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Joseph D Schmoker; David J Malenka; Bruce J Leavitt; Jock N McCullough; Paul W Weldner; Joseph P DeSimone; Benjamin M Westbrook; Reed D Quinn; John D Klemperer; Gerald L Sardella; Robert S Kramer; Elaine M Olmstead; Anthony W DiScipio
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Surgical revascularization techniques that minimize surgical risk and maximize late survival after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Sajjad Raza; Joseph F Sabik; Khalil Masabni; Ponnuthurai Ainkaran; Bruce W Lytle; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts.

Authors:  Dimitrios C Angouras
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years.

Authors:  Bruce W Lytle; Eugene H Blackstone; Joseph F Sabik; Penny Houghtaling; Floyd D Loop; Delos M Cosgrove
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  A meta-analysis of adjusted hazard ratios from 20 observational studies of bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Shin-nosuke Goto; Taku Watanabe; Yusuke Mizuno; Norikazu Kawai; Takuya Umemoto
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Bilateral skeletonized internal mammary versus single-pedicled internal mammary grafting in the elderly.

Authors:  Sahar Gideon; Avraham Meir; Alexander Battler; Yaron Shapira; Bernardo A Vidne; Itsik Ben-Dor
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.892

8.  Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  Gijong Yi; Brian Shine; Syed M Rehman; Douglas G Altman; David P Taggart
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on mid-term angiographic outcomes for radial artery versus saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Su C Ang; Kevin Wolak; Sheen Peeceeyen; Paul Bannon; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

10.  Lessons learned from the use of 1,977 in-situ bilateral internal mammary arteries: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Siamak Mohammadi; Francois Dagenais; Pierre Voisine; Eric Dumont; Richard Baillot; Daniel Doyle; Eric Charbonneau; Dimitri Kalavrouziotis
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 1.637
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.