Literature DB >> 10220677

Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one.

B W Lytle1, E H Blackstone, F D Loop, P L Houghtaling, J H Arnold, R Akhrass, P M McCarthy, D M Cosgrove.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Does the use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts provide incremental benefit relative to the use of a single ITA graft?
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, nonrandomized, long-term (mean follow-up interval of 10 postoperative years) study of patients undergoing elective primary isolated coronary bypass surgery who received either single (8123 patients) or bilateral ITA grafts (2001 patients), with or without additional vein grafts. Multiple statistical methods including propensity score matching, and multivariable parsimonious and nonparsimonious risk factor analyses were used to address the issues of patient selection and heterogeneity.
RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 0.7% for both the bilateral and single ITA groups. Survival for the bilateral ITA group was 94%, 84%, and 67%, and for the single ITA group 92%, 79%, and 64% at 5, 10, and 15 postoperative years, respectively (P <.001). Death, reoperation, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty were more frequent for patients undergoing single rather than bilateral ITA grafting, and this observation remained true despite multiple adjustments for patient selection, sampling, and length of follow-up. The differences between the bilateral and single ITA groups were greatest in regard to reoperation. The extent of benefit of bilateral ITA grafting varied according to patient-related variables, but no patient subsets were identified for whom single ITA grafting could be predicted to provide an advantage.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received 2 ITA grafts had decreased risks of death, reoperation, and angioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10220677     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70365-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  109 in total

1.  Bypass graft material and myocardial protective procedure in combined coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery.

Authors:  H Fujii; H Otani; T Oka; Y Hino; H Fujiwara; T Sumida; M Osako; H Imamura
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-09

2.  The technical aspects of radial artery harvesting.

Authors:  L D Conklin; E R Ferguson; M J Reardon
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2001

3.  Midterm results of complete arterial revascularization in more than 1,000 patients using an internal thoracic artery/radial artery T graft.

Authors:  H B Barner; T M Sundt; M Bailey; Y Zang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Why do UK cardiac surgeons not perform their first choice operation for coronary artery bypass graft?

Authors:  P A Catarino; E Black; D P Taggart
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  The new cardiac surgery patient: defying previous expectations.

Authors:  Sandeep K Aggarwal; Stephanie A Fox; Larry Stitt; Bob Kiaii; F Neil McKenzie; Alan H Menkis; Mackenzie A Quantz; Richard J Novick
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Extended use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries for coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly.

Authors:  Takashi Hirotani; Tsukasa Nakamichi; Mamoru Munakata; Shigeyuki Takeuchi
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-10

7.  Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: are BIMA better?

Authors:  D P Taggart
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Coronary revascularization in the 21st century. Emphasis on contributions by Japanese surgeons.

Authors:  Hendrick B Barner
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-12

Review 9.  Pedicled or skeletonized? A review of the internal thoracic artery graft.

Authors:  Carlos Del Campo
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2003

Review 10.  Indications for percutaneous and surgical revascularisation: how far does the evidence base guide us?

Authors:  P M Schofield
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.