| Literature DB >> 29951108 |
Chao Yang1, Lihua Li1, Ligang Yang1, Hui Lǚ1,2, Shaokang Wang1, Guiju Sun1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Until now, little research concerning the lipid-lowering and anti-obesity functions of garlic oil and onion oil has been performed. The objective of this study was to explore the effects of garlic oil and onion oil on serum lipid levels in hyperlipidemia model rats, to provide a scientific basis for the prevention of hyperlipidemia through a dietary approach, and to explore the potential health benefits of garlic and onion.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-obesity; Garlic oil; Hyperlipidemia; Onion oil; Rats
Year: 2018 PMID: 29951108 PMCID: PMC6011244 DOI: 10.1186/s12986-018-0275-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Composition of the experimental diets (%)
| Ingredient | Basal diet | High-fat diet |
|---|---|---|
| Casein | 23 | 20 |
| Corn starch | 32 | 29 |
| Sucrose | 31 | 25.3 |
| Fiber | 4 | 4 |
| Canola | 5 | 0 |
| Lard | 0 | 10 |
| Custard powder | 0 | 5 |
| Cholesterol | 0 | 1.5 |
| Bile salt | 0 | 0. 2 |
| Mineral mix | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Vitamin mix | 1 | 1 |
| DL- Methionine | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Choline chloride | 0. 2 | 0. 2 |
| Total | 100 | 100 |
Body weight and food intake of rats fed experimental diets for 60 days (, n = 12)
| Group | Initial body weight (g) | Final body weight (g) | Body weight gain (g/d) | Food intake (g/d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 166.8 ± 23.5 | 449.9 ± 38.7 | 6.3 ± 0.8 | 27. 4 ± 6.1 |
| HFD-A | 170.9 ± 26.7 | 540.3 ± 26.7a | 8. 2 ± 0.8a | 24. 4 ± 2.9a |
| HFD-B | 166.8 ± 21. 2 | 535.7 ± 40.7a | 8. 2 ± 0.8a | 23.6 ± 3.0a |
| GO-L | 159.6 ± 16.8 | 469.1 ± 37.8 | 6.8 ± 0.9b | 22.8 ± 1.6a |
| GO-M | 151.7 ± 18.6 | 447.9 ± 23.8b | 6.6 ± 0. 4b | 23.8 ± 4.0a |
| GO-H | 157.1 ± 12.9 | 409.5 ± 37.5b | 5.6 ± 0.8b | 22.6 ± 2.3a |
| OO-L | 152.8 ± 16.8 | 474.7± 22.5b | 7.1 ± 0.6b | 22.8 ± 1.6a |
| OO-H | 165.0 ± 17. 4 | 469. 4±21.3b | 6.7 ± 0.3b | 24. 2 ± 3.6a |
aCompared with NC, P < 0.05; bcompared with HFD-B, P < 0.05
The ratio of liver and kidney weights to body weight at the end of the experiment (, n = 12)
| Group | ratio of liver to body weight (g/100 g) | ratio of kidney to body weight (g/100 g) |
|---|---|---|
| NC | 3. 34 ± 0.45 | 0.90 ± 0. 18 |
| HFD-A | 4.86 ± 0.42a | 0.67 ± 0.10a |
| HFD-B | 4.85 ± 0.32a | 0.65 ± 0.07a |
| GO-L | 5. 11±1.71 | 0.75 ± 0.26 |
| GO-M | 5.37 ± 0.58 b | 0.85 ± 0.21b |
| GO-H | 6.07 ± 0. 22b | 0.81 ± 0.27 |
| OO-L | 5.60 ± 0.81b | 0.78 ± 0. 14b |
| OO-H | 5.94 ± 0.81b | 0.82 ± 0. 17b |
aCompared with NC, P < 0.05; bcompared with HFD-B, P < 0.05
Fat pad weight, the ratio of adipose tissue to body weight and Lee’s index in different groups at the end of the experiment (, n = 12)
| Group | Epididymal fat pad (g) | Perirenal fat pad (g) | Ratio of adipose tissue to body weight (g/100 g) | Lee index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 8. 22 ± 0.53 | 8.48 ± 0.25 | 3.73 ± 0.30 | 296.9 ± 9.8 |
| HFD-A | 10.43± 2.10a | 12.75± 2.15a | 4.29 ± 0.70a | 307.6± 11.1a |
| HFD-B | 10.49 ± 1.53a | 12.58 ± 3.35a | 4.30 ± 0.63a | 310. 2 ± 7.9a |
| GO-L | 9.51 ± 3.18 | 11.88 ± 4.75 | 4.48 ± 1.26 | 305.6 ± 11.9 |
| GO-M | 7.14 ± 1.68b | 10.01 ± 3.09 | 3.80 ± 0.89 | 302.3 ± 7.7b |
| GO-H | 6.42 ± 1.58b | 6.65 ± 1.86b | 3.18 ± 0.53b | 301.4 ± 13.3b |
| OO-L | 7.07 ± 2.08b | 9.99 ± 3.02 | 3.59 ± 0.61b | 301.4 ± 8.7b |
| OO-H | 8.49 ± 0.99b | 9.38± 2.35b | 3.80 ± 0.52b | 296.4 ± 6.6b |
aCompared with NC, P < 0.05; bcompared with HFD-B, P < 0.05
Serum levels of triglycerides (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) in rats fed the basic diet and high-fat diet at beginning of the experiment (mmol/L, , n = 12)
| Group | TG | TC |
|---|---|---|
| NC | 1.75 ± 0.84 | 1.95 ± 0.68 |
| HFD-A | 1.96 ± 0.65 | 2.11 ± 0.24 |
| HFD-B | 1.79 ± 0.82 | 2.16 ± 0.24 |
| GO-L | 1.85 ± 0.51 | 2.22 ± 0.27 |
| GO-M | 1.61 ± 0.75 | 2.15 ± 0.34 |
| GO-H | 1.40 ± 0.75 | 1.98 ± 0.33 |
| OO-L | 1.60 ± 0.77 | 2.14 ± 0.23 |
| OO-H | 1.77 ± 0.79 | 2.04 ± 0.21 |
Serum levels of TG, TC HDL-C and LDL-C in rats fed the basic diet and high-fat diet at the end of the experiment (mmol/L, , n = 12)
| Group | TG | TC | HDL-C | LDL-C | Atherosclerosis index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 0.96 ± 0.19 | 1.65 ± 0.29 | 0.81 ± 0.19 | 0.58 ± 0.24 | 1.12 ± 0.60 |
| HFD-A | 1.71 ± 0.60a | 3.11 ± 0.52a | 0.32 ± 0.18a | 1.68 ± 0.39a | 6.33 ± 2.02a |
| HFD-B | 1.88 ± 0.71a | 3.42 ± 0.52 | 0.31 ± 0.13a | 1.65 ± 0.32 | 7.86 ± 1.46a |
| GO-L | 1.52 ± 0.29 | 2.80 ± 0.45 | 0.55 ± 0.33b | 1.57 ± 0.34 | 3.67± 2.00b |
| GO-M | 1.75 ± 0.31 | 2.54 ± 0.56b | 0.56 ± 0.35b | 1.54 ± 0.40 | 4.54 ± 2.11b |
| GO-H | 1.49 ± 0.32 | 2.12 ± 0.58b | 0.62 ± 0.19b | 1.51 ± 0.48 | 2.54 ± 1.01b |
| OO-L | 1.33 ± 0.31b | 2.90 ± 0.40b | 0.54 ± 0.15b | 1.50 ± 0.27 | 4.18 ± 2.01b |
| OO-H | 1.22 ± 0.23b | 2.74 ± 0.31b | 0.63 ± 0.22b | 1.21 ± 0.23b | 4.56 ± 2.04b |
aCompared with NC, P < 0.05; bcompared with HFD-B, P < 0.05
The histopathologic observations of the liver of rats under a microscope (HE staining)
| Group | N | Numbers for different situations of steatosis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nulla | Littleb | Middlec | Seriousd | ||
| HFD-A | 11 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
| HFD-B | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| GO-L | 10 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| GO-M | 12 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| GO-H | 11 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
| OO-L | 12 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| OO-H | 12 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 2 |
a“Null” means that the liver has no apparent disease
b“Little” means that cell steatosis of the hepatic lobule is within 25%
c“Middle” means that cell steatosis of the hepatic lobule is within 50%
d“Serious” means that cell steatosis of the hepatic lobule is greater than 50%
Fig. 1Effects of garlic essential oil and onion essential oil on the liver shown by histological analysis of livers from rats in different groups (liver sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin; magnification_400)