Literature DB >> 29948585

Evaluation of right ventricular pacing parameters in patients with proliferative scar.

Veysel Kutay Vurgun1, Emir Baskovski2, Huseyin Goksuluk2, Nil Ozyuncu2, Turkan Seda Tan2, Ali Timucin Altin2, Basar Candemir2, Omer Akyurek2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dermal and myocardial injury results in a healing process, characterized by inflammation and fibrosis. We aimed to investigate association between proliferative scarring at the operation site and right ventricular (RV) pacing and sensing parameters, two clinical outcomes associated with impaired dermal and myocardial healing, respectively.
METHODS: We performed an observational retrospective study among regularly followed pacemaker (PM)/implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)-implanted patients at our medical center. Patients, who had a first RV active fixation PM/ICD lead implantation procedure and a minimum follow-up of 1 year, were included in the study. Redo procedures, passive fixation RV leads, epicardial leads, generator replacement procedures, and patients using class I and III anti-arrhythmic drugs were excluded. Patients in the control group, matched by age, sex and implanted device and lead type, were randomly selected from the patient pool. Lead impedance, pacing threshold, and R wave measurements obtained at baseline and at 3rd, 6th, and 12th month were analyzed.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of study and control groups were similar. While baseline and follow-up lead impedance and R wave measurements along with baseline and 3rd-month pacing thresholds showed no significant difference between two groups, 6th- and 12th-month pacing thresholds revealed statistically significant increase in proliferative scar group compared to control group (0.87 vs 0.72 p = 0.003 and 0.87 vs 0.71 p = 0.003, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: PM/ICD-implanted patients with proliferative scar on pocket wound may show increased RV pacing thresholds compared to patients with normal healing of pocket wound.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active fixation lead; Implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Pacemaker; Pacing threshold; Proliferative scar

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29948585     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-018-0395-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  23 in total

1.  Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: comparison of the Vancouver Scar Scale and scar volume.

Authors:  B Nedelec; H A Shankowsky; E E Tredget
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  2000 May-Jun

2.  Histological findings around electrodes in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients: comparison of steroid-eluting and non-steroid-eluting electrodes.

Authors:  Petr Dvorak; Miroslav Novak; Pavel Kamaryt; Bronislava Slana; Jolana Lipoldova; Pavel Dvorak
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Paired comparisons of steroid-eluting and nonsteroid endocardial pacemaker leads in dogs: electrical performance and morphologic alterations.

Authors:  A S Radovsky; J F Van Vleet; K B Stokes; W A Tacker
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers.

Authors:  Callie M Thompson; Ravi F Sood; Shari Honari; Gretchen J Carrougher; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.744

5.  In-stent restenosis: contributions of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia.

Authors:  R Kornowski; M K Hong; F O Tio; O Bramwell; H Wu; M B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC).

Authors:  Silvia G Priori; Carina Blomström-Lundqvist; Andrea Mazzanti; Nico Blom; Martin Borggrefe; John Camm; Perry Mark Elliott; Donna Fitzsimons; Robert Hatala; Gerhard Hindricks; Paulus Kirchhof; Keld Kjeldsen; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Antonio Hernandez-Madrid; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Tone M Norekvål; Christian Spaulding; Dirk J Van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Association between proliferative scars and in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Cagdas Ozdol; Sibel Turhan; Cansin Tulunay; A Timucin Altin; Yusuf Atmaca; Basar Candemir; Cetin Erol
Journal:  J Cutan Med Surg       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.092

Review 8.  Myocardial stimulation threshold in patients with cardiac pacemakers: effect of physiologic variables, pharmacologic agents, and lead electrodes.

Authors:  M L Dohrmann; N F Goldschlager
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.213

9.  Incidence and predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in 10 004 patients with surveillance angiography.

Authors:  Salvatore Cassese; Robert A Byrne; Tomohisa Tada; Susanne Pinieck; Michael Joner; Tareq Ibrahim; Lamin A King; Massimiliano Fusaro; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Common threads in cardiac fibrosis, infarct scar formation, and wound healing.

Authors:  Michael P Czubryt
Journal:  Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair       Date:  2012-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.