Literature DB >> 29948069

Evaluation of MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with benign and malignant bone tumors.

Alexandra S Gersing1, Daniela Pfeiffer2,3, Felix K Kopp2, Benedikt J Schwaiger2, Carolin Knebel4, Bernhard Haller5, Peter B Noël2,3, Marcus Settles2, Ernst J Rummeny2, Klaus Woertler2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic value of MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared with conventional radiographs in patients with benign and malignant bone tumors.
METHODS: In 32 patients with a benign or malignant bone lesion (mean age 33.9 ± 18.5 years, 17 females), 3-T MR imaging was performed including a 3D T1-weighted gradient echo sequence as the basis for the CT-like images. From these, intensity-inverted MR image volumes were converted into 2D images via a forward projection to obtain simulated radiographs. Two radiologists assessed these images as well as conventional radiographs for the type of periosteal reaction, matrix mineralization and destruction pattern. Agreement between the modalities was calculated using Cohen's κ.
RESULTS: The agreement between conventional radiographs and MR-derived CT-like images in combination with simulated radiographs was substantial (periosteal reaction, κ = 0.67; destruction pattern, κ = 0.75), and the sensitivity of both modalities for the final diagnosis of the lesion (aggressive vs. nonaggressive) was high (MR-derived CT-like images, 86.2% vs. conventional radiographs, 90.0%). Additional information on soft tissue extension (MR-derived CT-like images, 21.9% vs. conventional radiographs, 12.5%; p = 0.009) and lobulation (9.4% vs. 0%; p < 0.001) was significantly more often found on MR-derived CT-like images compared with conventional radiographs.
CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of the destruction patterns, periosteal reaction and distinction between aggressive and nonaggressive tumors was feasible using MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs and is comparable to that of conventional radiographs. Moreover, MR-derived CT-like images provided additional information on soft tissue extension and tumor architecture. KEY POINTS: • CT-like images and simulated radiographs can be generated from 3D MRI. • Evaluation of bone tumors is feasible with MR-derived images. • CT-like images and simulated radiographs provide additional information on bone tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone neoplasms; Diagnostic imaging; Joints; Magnetic resonance imaging; Musculoskeletal system

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29948069     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5450-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of three-dimensional fast spin echo and gradient echo sequences for high-resolution temporal bone imaging.

Authors:  P Schmalbrock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  CT-MR image data fusion for computer assisted navigated neurosurgery of temporal bone tumors.

Authors:  Stefan Franz Nemec; Markus Alexander Donat; Sheida Mehrain; Klaus Friedrich; Christian Krestan; Christian Matula; Herwig Imhof; Christian Czerny
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  Bone tumor imaging, then and now: review article.

Authors:  Douglas N Mintz; Sinchun Hwang
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-07-16

4.  Simulated radiographic bone and joint modeling from 3D ankle MRI: feasibility and comparison with radiographs and 2D MRI.

Authors:  Shaun M Nordeck; Conrad E Koerper; Aaron Adler; Vidur Malhotra; Yin Xi; George T Liu; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Guided image filtering.

Authors:  Kaiming He; Jian Sun; Xiaoou Tang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.226

6.  Determining growth rates of focal lesions of bone from radiographs.

Authors:  G S Lodwick; A J Wilson; C Farrell; P Virtama; F Dittrich
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. Part I: internal margins.

Authors:  J E Madewell; B D Ragsdale; D E Sweet
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 8.  Benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions: value of cross-sectional imaging.

Authors:  Klaus Woertler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Epiphyseal involvement in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  K I Norton; G Hermann; I F Abdelwahab; M J Klein; L F Granowetter; J G Rabinowitz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Bone tumors and tumorlike conditions: analysis with conventional radiography.

Authors:  Theodore T Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [The importance of radiology in bone sarcoma diagnostics : Initial and advanced diagnostics].

Authors:  Volker Vieth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  CT-like images based on T1 spoiled gradient-echo and ultra-short echo time MRI sequences for the assessment of vertebral fractures and degenerative bone changes of the spine.

Authors:  Benedikt J Schwaiger; Charlotte Schneider; Sophia Kronthaler; Florian T Gassert; Christof Böhm; Daniela Pfeiffer; Thomas Baum; Jan S Kirschke; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Marcus R Makowski; Klaus Woertler; Markus Wurm; Alexandra S Gersing
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Evaluation of MR-derived simulated CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with shoulder pain: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Georg C Feuerriegel; Felix K Kopp; Daniela Pfeiffer; Jonas Pogorzelski; Markus Wurm; Yannik Leonhardt; Christof Boehm; Sophia Kronthaler; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Jan Neumann; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Marcus R Makowski; Klaus Woertler; Alexandra S Gersing
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Three-Dimensional Bone Imaging of Musculoskeletal Pathologies: A Review.

Authors:  Mateusz C Florkow; Koen Willemsen; Vasco V Mascarenhas; Edwin H G Oei; Marijn van Stralen; Peter R Seevinck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.119

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.