Literature DB >> 11105019

Comparison of three-dimensional fast spin echo and gradient echo sequences for high-resolution temporal bone imaging.

P Schmalbrock1.   

Abstract

T2-weighted high-resolution gradient and fast spin echo sequences are widely used as an alternative or adjunct to contrast-enhanced T1-weighted temporal bone imaging. However, to date no systematic comparison has been presented. The purpose of this work is to identify optimal acquisition parameters and to compare volume gradient and fast spin echo techniques. Signal intensities and scan efficiency were computed for gradient echo segment-interleaved motion-compensated acquisition into steady state (SIMCAST), standard fast spin echo (FSE), and fast recovery fast spin echo (FR-FSE). Computations were compared with inner ear images acquired with cubic voxel sizes of 0.35-0.40 mm(3)in 5-8 minutes. Given otherwise identical conditions, the FR-FSE sequence produces images with improved SNR in shorter scan times than standard FSE. For FR-FSE, the scan efficiency is optimal for specific pairs of TR and echo train length, eg, 400 ms/8, 735 ms/16, and 2,050 ms/48. FR-FSE images with large TR and echo trains, while achieving better SNR, are severely compromised by blurring. Imaging with echo train lengths of 16-24 and TR of 800-1,200 ms is a good compromise, and FR-FSE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and scan efficiency become comparable to SIMCAST. In vivo image quality is excellent with both FR-FSE and SIMCAST, but SIMCAST images have slightly higher SNR and are significantly more crisp. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;12:814-825. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11105019     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200012)12:6<814::aid-jmri4>3.0.co;2-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  5 in total

1.  3-T imaging of the cochlear nerve and labyrinth in cochlear-implant candidates: 3D fast recovery fast spin-echo versus 3D constructive interference in the steady state techniques.

Authors:  John I Lane; Heidi Ward; Robert J Witte; Matt A Bernstein; Colin L W Driscoll
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Evaluation of MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with benign and malignant bone tumors.

Authors:  Alexandra S Gersing; Daniela Pfeiffer; Felix K Kopp; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Carolin Knebel; Bernhard Haller; Peter B Noël; Marcus Settles; Ernst J Rummeny; Klaus Woertler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Semicircular canal dehiscence: comparison of T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MRI and CT.

Authors:  G A Krombach; T Schmitz-Rode; P Haage; E DiMartino; A Prescher; S Kinzel; R W Günther
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Diagnostics and therapy of vestibular schwannomas - an interdisciplinary challenge.

Authors:  Steffen Rosahl; Christopher Bohr; Michael Lell; Klaus Hamm; Heinrich Iro
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

5.  MR imaging of the internal auditory canal and inner ear at 3T: comparison between 3D driven equilibrium and 3D balanced fast field echo sequences.

Authors:  Jun Soo Byun; Hyung Jin Kim; Yoo Jeong Yim; Sung Tae Kim; Pyoung Jeon; Keon Ha Kim; Sam Soo Kim; Yong Hwan Jeon; Jiwon Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.