Yasuaki Hayashino1, Shintaro Okamura2, Satoru Tsujii2, Hitoshi Ishii3. 1. Department of Endocrinology, Tenri Hospital, 200 Mishima-cho, Tenri City, Nara, 632-8552, Japan. hayasino-y@umin.net. 2. Department of Endocrinology, Tenri Hospital, 200 Mishima-cho, Tenri City, Nara, 632-8552, Japan. 3. Department of Diabetology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The absence of data on the direct association between diabetes-specific distress and all-cause mortality in individuals with diabetes prompted us to examine the temporal association between Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) survey scores and the subsequent risk of all-cause mortality in a cohort of individuals with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Longitudinal data from 3305 individuals with diabetes were obtained from a large Japanese diabetes registry. Independent correlations between quintiles of PAID total scores or PAID scores of ≥40 and all-cause mortality (median follow-up of 6.1 years) were examined using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: The study population included 1280 women and 2025 men with a mean age of 64.9 years, BMI of 24.6 kg/m2 and HbA1c level of 58.7 mmol/mol (7.5%). In the multivariable-adjusted model, compared with the first quintile of PAID scores, the multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for all-cause mortality for the second to fifth quintiles were 1.11 (0.77, 1.60; p = 0.56), 0.87 (0.56, 1.35; p = 0.524), 0.95 (0.63, 1.46; p = 0.802) and 1.60 (1.09, 2.36; p = 0.016), respectively. Compared with a PAID score of <40, the multivariable-adjusted HR for all-cause mortality of those with a score of ≥10 was 1.56 (95% CI 1.17, 2.08; p = 0.002). In subgroup analyses, the association between PAID score and all-cause mortality was found in men (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.26, 2.46) but not in women (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.60, 2.00), with a significant interaction between diabetes distress and sex (p = 0.0336). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: We observed a significant positive association between high diabetes distress and all-cause mortality in men with diabetes.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The absence of data on the direct association between diabetes-specific distress and all-cause mortality in individuals with diabetes prompted us to examine the temporal association between Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) survey scores and the subsequent risk of all-cause mortality in a cohort of individuals with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Longitudinal data from 3305 individuals with diabetes were obtained from a large Japanese diabetes registry. Independent correlations between quintiles of PAID total scores or PAID scores of ≥40 and all-cause mortality (median follow-up of 6.1 years) were examined using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: The study population included 1280 women and 2025 men with a mean age of 64.9 years, BMI of 24.6 kg/m2 and HbA1c level of 58.7 mmol/mol (7.5%). In the multivariable-adjusted model, compared with the first quintile of PAID scores, the multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for all-cause mortality for the second to fifth quintiles were 1.11 (0.77, 1.60; p = 0.56), 0.87 (0.56, 1.35; p = 0.524), 0.95 (0.63, 1.46; p = 0.802) and 1.60 (1.09, 2.36; p = 0.016), respectively. Compared with a PAID score of <40, the multivariable-adjusted HR for all-cause mortality of those with a score of ≥10 was 1.56 (95% CI 1.17, 2.08; p = 0.002). In subgroup analyses, the association between PAID score and all-cause mortality was found in men (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.26, 2.46) but not in women (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.60, 2.00), with a significant interaction between diabetes distress and sex (p = 0.0336). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: We observed a significant positive association between high diabetes distress and all-cause mortality in men with diabetes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diabetes distress; Epidemiology; Human; Mortality; Problem Areas in Diabetes survey; Type 2 diabetes
Authors: Pim Cuijpers; Nicole Vogelzangs; Jos Twisk; Annet Kleiboer; Juan Li; Brenda W Penninx Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: A Nicolucci; K Kovacs Burns; R I G Holt; M Comaschi; N Hermanns; H Ishii; A Kokoszka; F Pouwer; S E Skovlund; H Stuckey; I Tarkun; M Vallis; J Wens; M Peyrot Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: W H Polonsky; B J Anderson; P A Lohrer; G Welch; A M Jacobson; J E Aponte; C E Schwartz Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Basilio Pintaudi; Giuseppe Lucisano; Sandro Gentile; Angela Bulotta; Soren E Skovlund; Giacomo Vespasiani; Maria C Rossi; Antonio Nicolucci Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: William H Polonsky; Jennifer E Layne; Christopher G Parkin; Coco M Kusiak; Nathan A Barleen; David P Miller; Howard Zisser; Ronald F Dixon Journal: Clin Diabetes Date: 2020-10