| Literature DB >> 29947688 |
Fernando Athayde Madureira1,2, Cristiane Luzia Teixeira Gomez2, Eduardo Monteiro Almeida1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgeries with single port access have been gaining ground among surgeons who seek minimally invasive procedures. Although this technique uses only one access, the incision is larger when compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and this fact can lead to a higher incidence of incisional hernias. AIM: To compare the incidence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and by single port.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29947688 PMCID: PMC6049988 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arq Bras Cir Dig ISSN: 0102-6720
Characteristics of patients
| CAP | Comorbidities | Age | BMI | |
| SP | 8 | 8 | 48.64 (27 - 67) | 28.15 (24 - 41.9) |
| CVL | 17 | 18 | 64.67 (33 - 90) | 24.86 (16 - 34.52) |
| p | .064 | .008 | >.001 | .138 |
CAP=previous abdominal surgery; BMI=body mass index
FIGURE 1Umbilical incision of the skin
Surgical results
| SP (n=28) | CVL (n=28) | p | |
| Umbilical incision a | 3,7 (2,0-6,0) | 2,9 (2,0-5,0) | <,0001 |
| Abdominal diameter a | 3,6 (2,0-5,5) | 2,3 (1,0-4,5) | <,0001 |
| Surgical time b | 60,3 (32-128) | 51,3 (25-120) | 0,11 |
| Effective surgical time b | 34,9 (10-61) | 29,08 (7,0-65) | 0,19 |
| Removal time b | 8,3 (2,0-20) | 7,23 (2,0-30) | 0,85 |
| Closing time b | 8,21 (2,0-9,0) | 9,14 (3,0-15) | 0,08 |
| Seroma | 8% | 12% | 0,32 |
| Wound infection | 2,8% | 2,9% | 0,9 |
| Gallbladder perforation | 15.69% | 5,88% | 0,028 |
| Late incisional hernia | 6 | 1 | 0,012 |
Incision and diameter (cm); b Time (min)