Literature DB >> 29947595

Motor planning perturbation: muscle activation and reaction time.

Stefan Delmas1, Agostina Casamento-Moran1, Seoung Hoon Park1, Basma Yacoubi1, Evangelos A Christou1.   

Abstract

Reaction time (RT) is the time interval between the appearance of a stimulus and initiation of a motor response. Within RT, two processes occur, selection of motor goals and motor planning. An unresolved question is whether perturbation to the motor planning component of RT slows the response and alters the voluntary activation of muscle. The purpose of this study was to determine how the modulation of muscle activity during an RT response changes with motor plan perturbation. Twenty-four young adults (20.5 ±1.1 yr, 13 women) performed 15 trials of an isometric RT task with ankle dorsiflexion using a sinusoidal anticipatory strategy (10-20% maximum voluntary contraction). We compared the processing part of the RT and modulation of muscle activity from 10 to 60 Hz of the tibialis anterior (primary agonist) when the stimulus appeared at the trough or at the peak of the sinusoidal task. We found that RT ( P = 0.003) was longer when the stimulus occurred at the peak compared with the trough. During the time of the reaction, the electromyography (EMG) power from 10 to 35 Hz was less at the peak than the trough ( P = 0.019), whereas the EMG power from 35 to 60 Hz was similar between the peak and trough ( P = 0.92). These results suggest that perturbation to motor planning lengthens the processing part of RT and alters the voluntary activation of the muscle by decreasing the relative amount of power from 10 to 35 Hz. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We aimed to determine whether perturbation to motor planning would alter the speed and muscle activity of the response. We compared trials when a stimulus appeared at the peak or trough of an oscillatory reaction time task. When the stimulus occurred at the trough, participants responded faster, with greater force, and less EMG power from 10-35 Hz. We provide evidence that motor planning perturbation slows the response and alters the voluntary activity of the muscle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electromyography; motor neuron pool modulation; reaction time

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29947595      PMCID: PMC6230771          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00323.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.974


  27 in total

1.  Rectification and non-linear pre-processing of EMG signals for cortico-muscular analysis.

Authors:  L J Myers; M Lowery; M O'Malley; C L Vaughan; C Heneghan; A St Clair Gibson; Y X R Harley; R Sreenivasan
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  The nature of periodic input to the muscles.

Authors:  Tjeerd W Boonstra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Footedness is a better predictor of language lateralisation than handedness.

Authors:  L J Elias; M P Bryden
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  1998-01

4.  Rectification of the EMG signal impairs the identification of oscillatory input to the muscle.

Authors:  Osmar Pinto Neto; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Synchronization between motor cortex and spinal motoneuronal pool during the performance of a maintained motor task in man.

Authors:  B A Conway; D M Halliday; S F Farmer; U Shahani; P Maas; A I Weir; J R Rosenberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions.

Authors:  E E Smith
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  The initiation of gait in young, elderly, and Parkinson's disease subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Premotor and motor components of reaction time.

Authors:  J Botwinick; L W Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-01

9.  The role of synchrony and oscillations in the motor output.

Authors:  S N Baker; J M Kilner; E M Pinches; R N Lemon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Age-related slowing of response selection and production in a visual choice reaction time task.

Authors:  David L Woods; John M Wyma; E William Yund; Timothy J Herron; Bruce Reed
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Impact of Implementing an Exergame Program on the Level of Reaction Time Optimization in Handball, Volleyball, and Basketball Players.

Authors:  Dana Badau; Adela Badau; Carmen Ene-Voiculescu; Alin Larion; Virgil Ene-Voiculescu; Ion Mihaila; Julien Leonard Fleancu; Virgil Tudor; Corina Tifrea; Adrian Sebastian Cotovanu; Alexandru Abramiuc
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Older adults use a motor plan that is detrimental to endpoint control.

Authors:  Stefan Delmas; Yoon Jin Choi; Marcel Komer; Michelle Weintraub; Basma Yacoubi; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Reaction to a Visual Stimulus: Anticipation with Steady and Dynamic Contractions.

Authors:  Agostina Casamento-Moran; Stefan Delmas; Seoung Hoon Park; Basma Yacoubi; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.